Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Fine-needle versus core-needle biopsy – which one to choose in preoperative assessment of focal lesions in the breasts? Literature review Cover

Fine-needle versus core-needle biopsy – which one to choose in preoperative assessment of focal lesions in the breasts? Literature review

Open Access
|Dec 2017

References

  1. DomagałaW Diagnostyka zmian w piersi: biopsja aspiracyjna cienkoigłowa czy biopsja gruboigłowa? KomentarzMedycyna Praktyczna – Onkologia2010613(Tse GM, Tan PH: Diagnosing breast lesions by fine needle aspiration cytology or core biopsy: which is better? Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 123: 1–8)
  2. ParkerSHJobeWEDennisMAStavrosATJohnsonKKYakesWFUS-guided automated large-core breast biopsyRadiology1993187507511
  3. TseGMTanPHDiagnosing breast lesions by fine needle aspiration cytology or core biopsy: which is better?Breast Cancer Res Treat201012318
  4. FishmanJEMilikowskiCRamsinghaniRVelasquezMVAviramGUS-guided core-needle biopsy of the breast: how many speciments are necessary?Radiology2003226779782
  5. NassarACore needle biopsy versus fine needle aspiration biopsy in breast – a historical perspective and opportunities in the modern eraDiagn Cytopathol201139380388
  6. WillemsSMvan DeurzenCHMvan DiestPJDiagnosis of breast lesions: Fine-needle aspiration cytology or core needle biopsy?J Clin Pathol201265287292
  7. HukkinenKKivisaariLHeikkiläPSVon SmittenKLeideniusMUnsuccessful preoperative biopsies, fine needle aspiration cytology or core needle biopsy, lead to increased costs in the diagnostic workup in breast cancerActa Oncol20084710371045
  8. BalloMSSneigeNCan core needle biopsy replace fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of palpable breast carcinoma. a comparative study of 124 womenCancer199678773777
  9. HeQFanXYuanTKongLDuXZhuangDEleven years of experience reveals that fine-needle aspiration cytology is still a useful method for preoperative diagnosis of breast carcinomaBreast200716303306
  10. AkerFGümrükçüGOnomayBÇErkanMGürleyikGKiliçoğluGAccuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of breast cancer a single-center retrospective study from Turkey with cytohistological correlation in 733 casesDiagn Cytopathol201543978986
  11. BolívarAVAlfonso-BartoloméPGarcíaEOAyensaFGUltrasound-guided core needle biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions: a prospective analysis in 204 casesActa Radiol200546690695
  12. ParkSMLeeDWJinSYKimDWJeenYMChoiIHFine-needle aspiration cytology as the first pathological diagnostic modality in breast lesions: a comparison with core needle biopsyBasic Applied Pathology2010316
  13. ZhangCLewisDRNasutePHayesMWarrenLJGordonPBThe negative predictive value of ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: a validation study of 339 casesCancer Imaging201212488496
  14. WoodBJunckernstorffRSterrettGFrostFHarveyJRobbinsPa comparison of immunohistochemical staining for oestrogen receptors, progesterone receptors and HER-2 in breast biopsies and subsequent excisionsPathology200739391395
  15. PisanoEDFajardoLLTsimikasJSneigeNFrableWJGatsonisCARate of insufficient samples for fine-needle aspiration for nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: The Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group 5 Study. The RDOG5 investigatorsCancer199882679688
  16. IbrahimAEBatemanACTheakerJMLowJAddisBTidbutyPThe role and histological classification of needle core biopsy in comparison with fine needle aspiration cytology in the preoperative assessment of impalpable breast lesionsJ Clin Pathol200154121125
  17. LieskeBRavichandranDWrightDRole of fine-needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy in the preoperative diagnosis of screen-detected breast carcinomaBr J Cancer2006956266
  18. Breast fine needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy: a guide for practice2004CamperdownNational Breast Cancer Center
  19. ParkHLHongJVacuum-assisted breast biopsy for breast cancerGland Surg20143120127
  20. PovoskiSPJimenezREWangWPUltrasound-guided diagnostic breast biopsy methodology: retrospective comparison of the 8-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy approach versus the spring-loaded 14-gauge core biopsy approachWorld J Surg Oncol2011987.
  21. DarlingMLSmithDNLesterSCKaelinCSellandDLDenisonCMAtypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excisionAJR Am J Roentgenol200017513411346
  22. LeeSKYangJHWooSYLeeJENamSJNomogram for predicting invasion in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breastBr J Surg201310017561763
  23. ParkHLKwakJYJungHLeeSHShimJYKimJYIs mammotome excision feasible for benign breast mass bigger than 3 cm in greatest dimension?J Korean Surg Soc2006702529
  24. MarchDECoughlinBFBarhamRBGoulartRAKleinSVBurMEBreast masses: removal of all US evidence during biopsy by using handheld vacuum-assisted device – initial experienceRadiology2003227549555
  25. ParkHLKimLSThe current role of vacuum assisted breast biopsy system in breast diseaseJ Breast Cancer20111417
  26. KooistraBWautersCStrobbeLIndeterminate fine-needle aspiration: Repeat aspiration or core needle biopsy?Ann Surg Oncol200916281284
  27. HartmannLCRadiskyDCFrostMHSantenRJVierkantRABenettiLLUnderstanding the premalignant potential of atypical hyperplasia through its natural history: a longitudinal cohort studyCancer Prev Res (Phila)20147211217
  28. PinderSEEllisIOThe diagnosis and management of pre-invasive breast disease: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) – current definitions and classificationsBreast Cancer Res20035254547
  29. PolatAKKanbour-ShakirAAndacogluOPolatAVJohnsonRBonaventuraMAtypical hyperplasia on core biopsy: is further surgery needed?Am J Med Sci20123442831
  30. McGhanLJPockajBAWasifNGiurescuMEMcCulloughAEGrayRJAtypical ductal hyperplasia on core biopsy: an automatic trigger for excisional biopsy?Ann Surg Oncol20121932643269
  31. HsuHHYuJCHsuGCYuCPChangWCTungHJAtypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by ultrasonographically guided core needle biopsyUltraschall Med201233447454
  32. MesurolleBPerezJCHAzzumeaFLemercierEXieXAldisaAtypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at sonographically guided core needle biopsy: frequency, final surgical outcome, and factors associated with underestimationAJR Am J Roentgenol201420213891394
  33. ZhaoCDesoukiMMFloreaAMohammedKLiXDabbsDPathologic findings of follow-up surgical excisions for lobular neoplasia on breast core biopsy performed for calcificationsAm J Clin Pathol20121387278
  34. MurrayMPLuedtkeCLibermanLNehhozinaTAkramMBrogiEClassic lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical lobular hyperplasia at percutaneous breast core biopsy: Outcomes of prospective excisionCancer201311910731079
  35. JassemJKrzakowskiMBobek-BillewiczBDuchnowskaRJeziorskiAOlszewskiwKrzakowskiMWarzochaKRak piersi. Aktualizacja na dzień 03.12.2014Zalecenia postepowania diagnostyczno-terapeutycznego w nowotworach złośliwych – 2013 rok2013GdańskVia MedicaTom I
  36. LesurfRAureMRMørkHHVitelliVOslo Breast Cancer Research Consortium (OSBREAC)LundgrenSMolecular features of subtype-specific progression from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancerCell Rep20161611661679
  37. LeiflandKLagerstedtUSvaneGComparison of stereotactic fine needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in 522 non-palpable breast lesionsActa Radiol200344387391
  38. BrennanMETurnerRMCiattoSMarinovichMLFrenchJRMacaskillPDuctal carcinoma in situ at core-needle biopsy: meta-analysis of underestimation and predictors of invasive breast cancerRadiology2011260119128
  39. SchulzSSinnPGolattaMRauchGJunkermannHSchuetzFPrediction of underestimated invasiveness in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast on percutaneous biopsy as rationale for recommending concurrent sentinel lymph node biopsyBreast201322537542
  40. Caswell-SmithPWallMDuctal carcinoma in situ: Is core needle biopsy enough?J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol2017612933
  41. ParkSHKimMJKimSJKimEKDuctal carcinoma in situ diagnosed using an ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: can underestimation be predicted preoperatively?Ultrasonography201433128135
  42. LeeSKYangJHWooSYLeeJENamSJNomogram for predicting invasion in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breastBr J Surg201310017561763
  43. SilversteinMJSkinnerKALomisTJPredicting axillary nodal positivity in 2282 patients with breast carcinomaWorld J Surg200125767772
  44. MasoodSLoyaAKhalbussWIs core needle biopsy superior to fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of papillary breast lesions?Diagn Cythopatol200328329334
  45. LewisJTHartmannLCVierkantRAMaloneySDShane PankratzVAllersTMAn analysis of breast cancer risk in women with single, multiple, and atypical papillomaAm J Surg Pathol200630665672
  46. O’MalleyFVisscherDMacGroganGTanPHIchiharaSLakhaniSREllisIOSchnittSJTanPHvan de VijerMJIntraductal papillomaWHO classification of tumours of the breast2012LyonInternational Agency for Research on Cancer100102
  47. WiratkapunCKeeratitragoonTLertsithichaiPChanplakornNUpgrading rate of papillary breast lesions diagnosed by core-needle biopsyDiagn Interv Radiol201319371376
  48. ParejaFCorbenADBrennanSBMurrayMPBowserZLJakateKBreast intraductal papilloma without atypia in radiologic-pathologic concordant core-needle biopsies: rate of upgrade to carcinoma at excisionCancer201612228192827
  49. RizzoMLinebargerJLoweMCPanLGabramSGVasquezLManagement of papillary breast lesions diagnosed on core-needle biopsy: clinical pathologic and radiologic analysis of 276 cases with surgical follow-upJ Am Coll Surg2012214280287
  50. BianchiSBendinelliBSaladinoVVezzosiVBrancatoBNoriJNon-malignant breast papillary lesions – b3 diagnosed on ultrasound-guided 14-gauge needle core biopsy: Analysis of 114 cases from single institution and review of the literaturePathol Oncol Res201521535546
  51. JakubowskiWDobruch-SobczakKMigdaBStandards of the Polish Ultrasound Society – update. Sonomammography examinationJ Ultrason201212245261
  52. ChoiJKooJSComparative study of histological features between core needle biopsy and surgical excision in phyllodes tumorPathol Int201262120126
  53. LawtonTJAcsGArganiPFarshidGGilcreaseMGoldsteinNInterobserver variability by pathologist in the distinction between cellular fibroadenomas and phylloides tumorsInt J Surg Pathol201422695698
  54. GruberRWalterEHelbichTHCost comparison between ultrasound-guided 14-G large core breast biopsy and open surgical biopsy: an analysis from AustriaEur J Radiol201074519524
  55. LoughranCFKeelingCRSeeding of tumour cells following breast biopsy: a literature reviewBr J Radiol201184869874
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2017.0039 | Journal eISSN: 2451-070X | Journal ISSN: 2084-8404
Language: English
Page range: 267 - 274
Submitted on: Jun 19, 2017
Accepted on: Sep 14, 2017
Published on: Dec 29, 2017
Published by: MEDICAL COMMUNICATIONS Sp. z o.o.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2017 Ewa Łukasiewicz, Agnieszka Ziemiecka, Wiesław Jakubowski, Jelena Vojinovic, Magdalena Bogucevska, Katarzyna Dobruch-Sobczak, published by MEDICAL COMMUNICATIONS Sp. z o.o.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License.