Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Transcerebellar diameter versus biparietal diameter for the measurement of gestational age in third trimester Cover

Transcerebellar diameter versus biparietal diameter for the measurement of gestational age in third trimester

Open Access
|Feb 2022

References

  1. Zakaria AM, Mohamed AS, Eldarder AK: Comparison between transcerebellar diameter, biparietal diameter and femur length for gestational age measurement accuracy in third trimester of pregnancy. Egypt J Hosp Med 2019; 74: 17–22.
  2. Goel P, Singla M, Ghal R, Jain S, Budhiraja V, Ramesh CS: Transverse cerebellar diameter – a marker for estimation of gestational age. J Anat Soc India 2017; 59: 158–161.
  3. Oladokun A, Oladokun RE, Morhason-Bello I, Bello AF, Adedokun B: Proximate predictors of early antenatal registration among Nigerian pregnant women. Ann Afr Med 2017; 9: 222–225.
  4. Gardosi J: Clinical strategies for improving the detection of fetal growth restriction Clin Perinatol 2011; 38: 21–31.
  5. Chambliss LR, Clark SL: Paper gestational age wheels are generally inaccurate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210: 145.e1–145.e4.
  6. Goel P, Mukesh S, Ghal R, Jain S, Budhiraja V, Babu CSR: Transverse cerebellar diameter: a marker for estimation of gestational age. J Anat Soc India 2010; 59: 158–161.
  7. Satish Prasad BS, Likhitha S: Cerebellar measurements with ultrasonography in the evaluation of fetal age. J Dent Med Sci 2014; 13: 49–56.
  8. Davies MW, Swaminathan M, Betheras FR: Measurement of transverse cerebellar diameter in preterm neonates and its use in assessment of gestational age. Aust Radiol 2001; 45: 309–312.
  9. Buck Louis GM, Grewal J, Albert PS, Sciscione A, Wing DA, Grobman WA et al.: Racial/ethnic standards for fetal growth, the NICHD fetal growth studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 449.e1–449.e41.
  10. Naseem F, Fatima N, Yasmeen S, Saleem S: Comparison between transcerebellar diameter with biparietal diameter of ultrasound for gestational age measurement in third trimester of pregnancy. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2013; 23: 322–325.
  11. Bavini S, Mittal R, Mendiratta SL: Ultrasonographic measurement of the transcerebellar diameter for gestational age estimation in the third trimester. J Ultrasound 2021.
  12. Reddy RH, Pashanth K, Ajit M: Significance of foetal transcerebellar diameter in foetal biometry: a pilot Study. J Clin Diagn Res 2017; 11: TC01–TC04.
  13. Dashottar S, Senger K, Shukla Y, Singh A, Sharma S: Transcerebellar diameter: an effective tool in predicting gestational age in normal and IUGR pregnancy. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2018; 7: 4190–4196.
  14. George R, Amirthalingam U, Hussain MRK, Aditiya V, Anand AM, Padmanaban E et al.: Can trans-cerebellar diameter supersede other fetal biometry in measuring gestational age? A prospective study. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 2021; 52: 197.
  15. Chavez MR, Ananth CV, Kaminsky LM, Smulian JC, Yeo L, Vintzileos AM: Fetal transcerebellar diameter measurement for prediction of gestational age in twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 1596–1600.
  16. Chavez MR, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM: Fetal transcerebellar diameter measurement for prediction of gestational age at the extremes of fetal growth. J Ultrasound Med 2007; 26: 1167–1171.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2022.0007 | Journal eISSN: 2451-070X | Journal ISSN: 2084-8404
Language: English
Page range: 39 - 43
Submitted on: Aug 20, 2021
Accepted on: Oct 20, 2022
Published on: Feb 8, 2022
Published by: MEDICAL COMMUNICATIONS Sp. z o.o.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Mohamed Adel Ali, Eman AbdElSalam NasrElDin, Mahmoud Moussa, published by MEDICAL COMMUNICATIONS Sp. z o.o.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.