References
- Almanasreh, E., Moles, R. J., & Chen, T. F. (2022). A practical approach to the assessment and quantification of content validity. In Contemporary research methods in pharmacy and health services (pp. 583-599). Academic Press.
- Andrés-Sánchez, J., & Gené-Albesa, J. (2023a). Assessing Attitude and Behavioral Intention toward Chatbots in an Insurance Setting: A Mixed Method Approach. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40, 4918–4933. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2227833
- Andrés-Sánchez, J., & Gené-Albesa, J. (2023b). Explaining Policyholders’ Chatbot Acceptance with an Unified Technology Acceptance and Use of Technology-Based Model. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res., 18, 1217–1237. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer18030062
- Andrés-Sánchez, J., & Gené-Albesa, J. (2024). Drivers and Necessary Conditions for Chatbot Acceptance in the Insurance Industry. Analysis of policyholders’ and professionals’ Perspectives. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 35, 189–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2024.2435118
- Borsci, S., Malizia, A., Schmettow, M., van der Velde, F., Tariverdiyeva, G., Balaji, D., & Chamberlain, A. (2022). The Chatbot Usability Scale: The Design and Pilot of a Usability Scale for Interaction with AI-Based Conversational Agents. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 26(1), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-021-01582-9
- Gebert-Persson, S., Gidhagen, M., Sallis, J. E., & Lundberg, H. (2019). Online insurance claims: When more than trust matters. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37(2), 579–594. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-02-2018-0024
- Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
- Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
- Nov, O., Singh, N., & Mann, D. (2023). Putting ChatGPT’s Medical Advice to the (Turing) Test: Survey Study. JMIR Medical Education, 9(1), e46939. https://doi.org/10.2196/46939
- Pfeuffer, N., Benlian, A., Gimpel, H., & Hinz, O. (2019). Anthropomorphic Information Systems. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61(4), 523–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-019-00599-y
- Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
- Przegalinska, A., Ciechanowski, L., Stroz, A., Gloor, P., & Mazurek, G. (2019). In bot we trust: A new methodology of chatbot performance measures. Business Horizons, Digital Transformation & Disruption, 62(6), 785–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.08.005
- Rese, A., Ganster, L., & Baier, D. (2020). Chatbots in retailers’ customer communication: How to measure their acceptance? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 56, 102176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102176
- Salles, A., Evers, K., & Farisco, M. (2020). Anthropomorphism in AI. AJOB Neuroscience, 11(2), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2020.1740350
- Yang, R., & Wibowo, S. (2022). User trust in artificial intelligence: A comprehensive conceptual framework. Electronic Markets, 32(4), 2053–2077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00592-6
- Yang, W., & Zhou, J. (2021). Service Innovation of Insurance Data Based on Cloud Computing in the Era of Big Data. Complexity, 2021(1), 2303129. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2303129
Language: English
Page range: 208 - 217
Submitted on: Jun 1, 2026
Accepted on: Jun 21, 2026
Published on: Aug 27, 2026
Published by: Vytautas Magnus University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2026 Dana Jašková, Katarína Kráľová, published by Vytautas Magnus University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.