
Chart 1
Family size

Chart 2
Monthly income (in euros, €)

Chart 3
Purchase of eco-friendly products

Chart 4
Respondents’ green marketing awareness
Table 1
First Hypothesis Test

Chart 5
Respondents’ trust in advertising concerning health benefits of non-alcoholic beverages versus respondents’ trust in producers claiming to be environmentally friendly.
Table 2
Second Hypothesis Test
| Hypothesis 2 | Trust in producers claiming to be environmentally friendly | Trust in advertising concerning health benefits of beverages | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust in producers claiming to be environmentally friendly | Pearson correlation | 1 | .115** |
| Significance (two-tailed) | .008 | ||
| N | 529 | 524 | |
| Trust in advertising concerning health benefits of beverages | Pearson correlation | .115** | 1 |
| Significance (two-tailed) | .008 | ||
| N | 524 | 533 | |

Chart 6
Participation in environment protection activities

Chart 7
Exposure to green marketing campaign

Chart 8
Trust in product labels

Chart 9
Consumers’ willingness to pay more

Chart 10
Level of premium consumers are willing to pay
Table 3
Third Hypothesis Test
| Hypothesis 3 | Participation in environment protection activities | Willingness to pay more for eco-friendly products (natural beverages) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participation in environment protection activities | Pearson correlation | 1 | .135** |
| Significance (two-tailed) | .002 | ||
| N | 534 | 517 | |
| Willingness to pay more for eco-friendly products (natural beverages) | Pearson correlation | .135** | 1 |
| Significance (two-tailed) | .002 | ||
| N | 517 | 522 | |

Chart 11
Consumers’ information search for the purchasing of non-alcoholic beverages

Chart 12
Statements on environmentally friendly consumer behaviour
Table 4
Fourth Hypothesis Test
| Hypothesis 4 | Effect of social media on environmentally friendly consumer behaviour | Effect of family on environmentally friendly consumer behaviour | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Effect of social media on environmentally friendly consumer behaviour | Pearson correlation | 1 | .462** |
| Significance (two-tailed) | 0 | ||
| N | 534 | 533 | |
| Effect of family on environmentally friendly consumer behaviour | Pearson correlation | .462** | 1 |
| Significance (two-tailed) | 0 | ||
| N | 533 | 535 | |
Table 5
Fifth Hypothesis Test
| Hypothesis 5 | Effect of governmental regulatory infrastructure on environmentally friendly consumer behaviour | Effect of environmental organisations on environmentally friendly consumer behaviour | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Effect of governmental regulatory infrastructure on environmentally friendly consumer behaviour | Pearson correlation | 1 | .484** |
| Significance (two-tailed) | 0 | ||
| N | 534 | 534 | |
| Effect of environmental organisations on environmentally friendly consumer behaviour | Pearson correlation | .484** | 1 |
| Significance (two-tailed) | 0 | ||
| N | 534 | 534 | |
