Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Some Reflections on Custom in International Economic Law Cover
Open Access
|Jan 2019

References

  1. Abbott KW, ‘International Economic Law: Implications for Scholarship’ (1996) 17(2) University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 505.
  2. Akinsaya AA, The Expropriation of Multinational Property in the Third World (1980).
  3. Atik J, ‘Uncorking International Trade, filling the cup of International Economic Law’ (1999-2000) 15 American Journal of International Law Review 1231.
  4. Baron G, ‘Do the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts form a new lex mercatoria?, ‘http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/biblio/baron.html
  5. Bello JH, Holmerz AF, ‘After the Cold War: Whither International Economic Law?’ (1991) 32(2) Harvard International Law Journal 323.
  6. Berger KP, ‘The relationship between the Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts and the new lex mercatoria’ (2000) 5(1) Uniform Law Review 153.10.1093/ulr/5.1.153
  7. Białocerkiewicz J, Powstanie i rozwój prawa międzynarodowego gospodarczego (1987).
  8. Chukwumerije O, Choice of Law in Commercial Arbitration (Westport 1994).10.5040/9798400626029
  9. D’Amato AA, The Concept of Custom in International Law (1971).
  10. Dasser F, Internationale Schiedsgerichte und lex mercatoria (1989).
  11. Edwards Jr. RW, International Monetary Collaboration (1985).10.5089/9781616351977.011
  12. Ellis ME, ‘The New International Economic Order and General Assembly Resolutions: the Debate over the Legal Effects of General Assembly Resolution Revisited’ (1985) 15 California Western International Law Journal 647.
  13. Fortier Y, ‘The New New Lex Mercatoria, or Back to the Future’ (2001) 17(2) Arbitration International 121.10.1023/A:1011242631762
  14. Gilas J, Prawo międzynarodowe gospodarcze (1998).
  15. Goldman B, ‘The Applicable Law: General Principles of Law – the Lex Mercatoria’ in
  16. Goode R, ‘Usage and Its Reception in Transnational Commercial Law’ (1997) 46(1) International & Comparative Law Quarterly 1.10.1017/S0020589300060097
  17. Güςer S, ‘Lex Mercatoria in International Arbitration’ (2009) 1 Ankara Bar Review 30.
  18. Highet K, ‘The Enigma of the Lex Mercatoria’ (1989) 63 Tulane Law Review 431.
  19. Jackson JH, ‘International Economic Law: Reflections on the “Boilerroom” of International Relations’ (1995) 10 American University Journal of International Law and Policy 595.
  20. Lando O, ‘The Lex Mercatoria and International Commercial Arbitration’ (1985) 34(4) ICLQ 747.10.1093/iclqaj/34.4.747
  21. Lankosz K, Kuźniak B, ‘Stosunki międzynarodowe – przedmiot i metoda nauczania <http://www.pism.pl/pdf/K.Lankosz-B.Kuzniak.pdf>.
  22. Lew J (ed), Contemporary Problems in International Arbitration (1987) 116.10.1007/978-94-017-1156-2
  23. Lowenfeld AF, International Economic Law (2008).10.1093/oso/9780199226931.001.0001
  24. López Rodríguez AM, ‘Lex Mercatoria’ (2002) RETTID 46.
  25. Maniruzzaman AFM, ‘The Lex Mercatoria and International Contracts: A Challenge for International Commercial Arbitration?’ (1999) 14(3) American University International Law Review 657.
  26. Mann FA, ‘England rejects Delocalised Contracts and Arbitration’ (1984) 33(1) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 193.10.1093/iclqaj/33.1.193
  27. Mann FA, The Legal Aspects of Money (1982).
  28. McRae DM, ‘The Contribution of International Trade Law to the Development of International Law’ (1996) 1 Recueil des Cours de l’Academie de Droit International 99.
  29. Michaels R, ‘The True Lex Mercatoria: Law Beyond the State’ (2007) 14(2) Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 447.10.2979/gls.2007.14.2.447
  30. Mortelmans K, ‘The Interdependence of International, European and National Economic Law: The European Community Example’ in PV Dijk Restructuring the international economic order: the role for law and lawyers (1986) 14.
  31. Mustill M, Boyd S, Commercial Arbitration (1989).
  32. Mustill M, ‘The New Lex Mercatoria: The First Twenty-five Years’ in M Bos, I Brownlie (eds), Liber Amicorum for Lord Wilberforce (1987) 161.
  33. Petersmann E-U, ‘International Economic Theory and International Economic Law: On the Tasks of a Legal Theory of International Economic Order’ in RStJ MacDonald, DM Johnston (eds) The Structure and Process of International Law: Essays in Legal Philosophy Doctrine and Theory (1983) 251.10.1163/9789004636224_009
  34. Picker CB, Bunn ID, Arner DW (eds), International Economic Law. The State and Future of the Discipline (2008).
  35. Qureshi AH, Ziegler A, International Economic Law (2011).
  36. Schwarzenberger G, The Principles and Standards of International Economic Law (1966) 117 Recueil des Cours 1.
  37. Schwarzenberger G, ‘The Province and Standards of International Economic Law’ (1984) 2 International Law Quarterly 402.
  38. Seidl-Hohenveldern I, International Economic Law (1999).
  39. Selden BS, ‘Lex Mercatoria in European and U.S. Trade Practice: Time to Take a Closer Look’ (1995) 2(1) Annual Survey of International and Comparative Law 111.
  40. Trakman LA, The Evolution of the Law Merchant: Our Commercial Heritage (1980) 12(2) Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce 1.
  41. VerLoren van Themaat P, The Changing Structure of International Economic Law (Hague 1981).10.1163/9789004635821
  42. Villiger ME, Customary International Law and Treaties (1985).10.1163/9789004636231
  43. Volckart O, Mangels A, ‘Are the Roots of the Modern Lex Mercatoria Really Medieval?’ (1999) 65(3) Southern Economic Journal 427.10.2307/1060808
  44. Wasilewski T, ‘Prawo międzynarodowe publiczne, międzynarodowe prawo gospodarcze a europejskie prawo wspólnotowe – aspekt komparatystyczny’ (2005) 3 Studia Europejskie 31.
  45. Wasilewski T, Stosunek wzajemny: porządek międzynarodowy, prawo międzynarodowe, europejskie prawo wspólnotowe, prawo krajowe (2004)
  46. Zamora S, ‘International Economic Law’, (1996) 17(1) University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 63.
  47. Zamora S, ‘Is There Customary International Economic Law?’ (1989) 32 German Yearbook of International Law 9.
  48. Ziemblicki B, ‘Współczesne rozumienie pojęcia międzynarodowego prawa gospodarczego’ (2014) 197(1) Studia Prawnicze PAN 181.10.37232/sp.2014.1.7
Language: English
Page range: 204 - 217
Published on: Jan 3, 2019
Published by: University of Wroclaw, Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2019 Bartosz Ziemblicki, published by University of Wroclaw, Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.