Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Preserving the Effectiveness of UNCLOS despite a Party’s Non-Appearance? Some Remarks on the Arctic Sunrise Arbitration (Netherlands V. Russia) in the Context of Human Rights Protection Cover

Preserving the Effectiveness of UNCLOS despite a Party’s Non-Appearance? Some Remarks on the Arctic Sunrise Arbitration (Netherlands V. Russia) in the Context of Human Rights Protection

Open Access
|Jan 2019

References

  1. Celembrano-Mallari CRL, ‘Non-Appearance and Compliance in the Context of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea Dispute Settlement Mechanism’ (2014) 88 Philippine Law Journal 300.
  2. Drenan MT, ‘Gone Overboard: Why the Arctic Sunrise Case Signals an Over-Expansion of the Ship-As-A-Unit Concept in the Diplomatic Protection Context’ (2014) 45 California Western International Law Journal 109.
  3. Guilfoyle D, Miles CA, ‘Provisional Measures and the MV Arctic Case’ (2014) 108 American Journal of International Law 271.10.5305/amerjintelaw.108.2.0271
  4. Mik C, ‘Zasada wykonywania zobowiązań w dobrej wierze w orzeczeniach arbitrażu międzynarodowego’ [The Principle of Performance of Obligations in Good Faith in International Arbitration Awards] in C Mik, Arbitraż w prawie międzynarodowym [Arbitration in International Law] (2014) 122.
Language: English
Page range: 172 - 187
Published on: Jan 3, 2019
Published by: University of Wroclaw, Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2019 Michał Balcerzak, published by University of Wroclaw, Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.