References
- Alvik Ivar, Contracting with Sovereignty (Oxford, Portland 2011).
- Bishop Doak, ‘Investor–State Dispute Settlement Under the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: Have the Negotiations Run Aground?’ (2015) 30 (1) ICSID Review.
- Dolzer Rudolf, Schreuer Christopher, Principles of International Investment Law (Oxford 2008).
- Frank Susan D, ‘The Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law Through Inconsistent Decisions’ (2005) 73 (4) Fordham Law Review.
- Gaukrodger David, ‘Investment Treaties and Shareholder Claims: Analysis of Treaty Practice’ OECD Working Papers on International Investment 2014/03, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jxvk6shpvs4-en.
- Giorgetti Chiara, ‘Who decides who decides in international investment arbitration’ (2014) 35 (2) University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law.
- Henckels Caroline, ‘Indirect expropriation and the right to regulate: revisiting proportionality analysis and the standard of review in investor-state arbitration’ (2012) 15 (1) Journal of International Economic Law.
- Kawharu Amokura, ‘Participation of Non-governmental Organizations in Investment Arbitration as Amici Curiae’ in Michael Waibel, Asha Kaushal, et al. (eds), The Backlash against Investment Arbitration (Kluwer Law International 2010).
- Kjos Hege Elizabeth, Applicable law in investor-state arbitration. The interplay between national and international law (Oxford 2013).
- Legum Barton, ‘Appellate Mechanism for Investment Arbitration: Worth a Second Look for the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Proposed EU-US FTA?’ (2014) 11 (1) Transnational Dispute Management.
- Levine Eugenia, ‘Amicus Curiae in International Investment Arbitration: The Implications of an Increase in Third-Party Participation’ (2011) 29 (1) Berkley Journal of International Law Volume.
- Ngangjoh-Hodu Yengkong, Ajibo Collins C, ‘ICSID Annulment Procedure and the WTO Appellate System: The Case for an Appellate System for Investment Arbitration’ (2015) 6 Journal of International Dispute Settlement.
- OECD, ‘„Indirect expropriation” and the „right to regulate” in international investment law’, working paper on international investment, 2004/04.
- Reinisch August, ‘The issues raised by parallel proceedings and possible solutions’ in Michael Waibel, Asha Kaushal, et al. (eds), The Backlash against Investment Arbitration (Kluwer Law International 2010).
- Report ‘Online public consultation on investment protection and investor-to-state dispute settlement (ISDS) in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Agreement’, http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/january/tradoc_153044.pdf.
- Salacuse Jeswald W, The Three Laws of International Investment: National, Contractual, and International Frameworks for Foreign Capital (Oxford 2013).
- Titi Catharine, The right to regulate in international investment law (Baden-Baden 2014).
- UNCTAD, ‘World Investment Report 2014, Investor-state dispute settlement. UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements’, http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/diaeia2013d2_en.pdf.
- UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2015, Reforming International Investment Governance, http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2015_en.pdf.
- van den Berg Albert Jan, ‘Dissenting Opinions by Party-Appointed Arbitrators in Investment Arbitration’ in Mahnoush H. Arsanjani, Jacob Katz Cogan, Robert D. Sloane and Siegfried Wiessner (eds), Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of W. Michael Reisman (Leiden, Boston 2010).
- Waibel Michael, Kaushal Asha, et al. (eds), The Backlash against Investment Arbitration (Kluwer Law International 2010).
- Yannaca-Small Katia, ‘Indirect Expropriation and the Right to Regulate: How to Draw the Line? in Katia Yannaca-Small (ed) Arbitration under International Investment Agreements; A Guide to the Key Issues (Oxford 2010).