Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Going Online - is the World Ready to Replace Litigation with Online Dispute Resolution Mechanisms? Cover

Going Online - is the World Ready to Replace Litigation with Online Dispute Resolution Mechanisms?

Open Access
|Oct 2016

References

  1. Balcarczyk J, ‘Zagadnienie formy umowy o arbitraż w świetle art. II (2) Konwencji nowojorskiej o uznawaniu i wykonywaniu zagranicznych orzeczeń arbitrażowych oraz w świetle regulacji wewnętrznych’, <http://arbitraz.laszczuk.pl/_adr/49/Zagadnienie_formy_umowy_o_arbitraz_w_swietle_art._II__2__Konwencji_nowojorskiej_o_uznawaniu_i_wykonywaniu_zagranicznych_orzeczen_arbitrazowych_oraz_w_swietle_regulacji_wewnetrznych.pdf>.
  2. Berners-Lee T, Fischetti M, Weaving the Web: the Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web (San Fransisco 1999).
  3. Davis BG, Synder FG, Elliott KE, Manzo PB, Gaitenby A, Larson DA, ‘The First International Competition for Online Dispute Resolution: Is it Big, Different and New?’ (2002) 19(4) Journal of International Arbitration.10.1023/A:1019750603760
  4. Del Duca L, Rule C, Loebl Z, ‘Facilitating Expansion of Cross-Border E-Commerce – Developing Global Online Dospute Resolution System (Lessons Derived from Existing ODF Systems – Work of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law)’ (2012) 1(1) Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs.10.2139/ssrn.1970613
  5. Fiss O, ‘Against Settlement’ (1984) 93 Yale Law Review.10.2307/796205
  6. Geist MA, ‘The Reality Bytes: Regulating Economic Activity in the Age of the Internet’ (1998) 73 Washington Law Review.
  7. Halla S, ‘Arbitration Going Online – New Challenges in 21st Century?’ https://journals.muni.cz/mujlt/article/view/2583/2147.
  8. Haloush HA, ‘The Authenticity of Online Alternative Dispute Resolution Proceedings’ (2008) 25(3) Journal of International Arbitration.10.54648/JOIA2008026
  9. Hang LQ, ‘Online Dispute Resolution Systems: The Future of Cyberspace Law’ (2001) 41(3) Santa Clara Law Review.
  10. Hill R, ‘Will Cyberspace use Cybercourts?’ (1997) International Commercial Litigation. Galloway PD, ‘Is Construction Arbitration ready for Online Dispute Resolution?’ (2013) 30(2) The International Construction Law Review.
  11. Junke XU, ‘Development of ODR in China’ <https://law.pace.edu/lawschool/files/iicl/odr/Xu_Junke.pdf>.
  12. Kallel S, ‘Online Arbitration’ (2008) 25(3) Journal of International Arbitration.10.54648/JOIA2008025
  13. Katsh E, ‘Bringing Online Dispute Resolution to Virtual Worlds: Creating Processes Through Code’ (2004) 49 New York Law Review.
  14. Katsh E, ‘Online Dispute Resolution: Some Lesson from the E-Commerce Revolution’ (2001) 28(4) Northern Kentucky Law Review.
  15. Katsh E, ‘The New Frontier. Online ADR becoming a global priority’ (2000) Dispute Resolution Magazine.
  16. Kaufmann-Kohler G, ‘Online Dispute Resolution and its Significance for International Commercial Arbitration’, <http://www.lkk.com/data/document/online-dispute-resolution-and-its-significance-forinternational-commercial-arbitration-global.pdf>
  17. Kesna JP, Shah RC, ‘Fool us once shame on you – fool us twice shame on us: what we can learn from the Privatisations of the Internet Backbone Network and the Domain Name System’ (1994) 79(1) Washington University Law Quarterly.
  18. Kumar S, ‘Virtual Venues: Improving Online Dispute Resolution as an Alternative to Cost Intensive Litigation’ (2009) 27(1) John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law.
  19. Lastowka FG, Hunter D, ‘The Laws of Virtual Worlds’ (2004) 92 California Law Review.10.2307/3481444
  20. Rogers V, ‘Managing Disputes in the Online Global Marketplace. Reviewing the Progress of UNCITRAL’s Working Group III on ODR’ (2013) Dispute Resolution Magazine.
  21. Rule C, Nagarajan C, ‘Leveraging the Widsom of Crowds: The eBay Community Court and the Future of Online Dispute Resolution’ (2010) ACResolution.
  22. Schultz T, ‘The Role of Dispute Settlement and ODR’ in A Ingez-Housz, ADR in Business: Practice and Issues across Countries and Cultures, vol. II (Bedfordshire 2011).
  23. Szostek D, Świerczyński M, ‘Arbitraż elektroniczny’ (2006) 16 Monitor Prawniczy.
  24. Turner RI, ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution in Cyberspace: there is more on the line than just getting “online”’ (2000) 7 ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law.
  25. Tyler MC, Bretherton D, ‘Online Alternative Dispute Resolution’ (2003) 7 Vindobona Journal of International Commercial Law & Arbitration.
  26. Wahab MB, ‘Online Dispute Resolution and Digital Inclusion: Challenging the Global Digital Divide’ <http://www.mediate.com/Integrating/docs/ODR%20and%20Digital%20Inclusion%20-%20Mohamed%20Abdel%20Wahab.pdf>.
  27. Weinstein JB, ‘Some Benefits and Risks of Privatization of Justice Through ADR’ (1996) 11 Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution.
  28. Wolfe JS, ‘Symposium: Alternative Dispute Resolution In the Twenty-First Century: Across the Ripple of Time: The Future of Alternative (or, is it “Appropriate?”) Dispute Resolution’ (2001) 36 Tulsa Law Journal.
Language: English
Page range: 40 - 51
Published on: Oct 18, 2016
Published by: University of Wroclaw, Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2016 Bartosz Ziemblicki, published by University of Wroclaw, Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.