Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessing the Contribution of Urban Freight Terminals in Last Mile Operations Cover

Assessing the Contribution of Urban Freight Terminals in Last Mile Operations

Transport and Telecommunication Journal
Volume 17 (2016): Issue 3 (September 2016)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Jun 2016
References

References

  1. 1. Andersen J., Eidhammer O., Osland, O., Parra L. and Adamos, G. (2010) Interconnections between short and long-distance transport networks: Structure of interface and existing indicators. Deliverable 3.1. CLOSER - Connecting LOng and Short-distance networks for Efficient tRansport.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Andersen, J., Eidhammer, O., Gogas, M., Papoutsis, K. and Nathanail, E. (2014) Demonstration assessments. Deliverable 5.1. STRAIGHTSOL - STRAtegies and measures for smarter urban freiGHT SOLutions.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Chen, M.K. and Wang, S. (2010) The critical factors of success for information service industry in developing international market: Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 37, 2010, pp. 694-704.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Christiansen, P., Johansen, B.G., Andersen, J. and Eidhammer, O. (2012) Case studies: Results and synthesis. Deliverable 5.2. CLOSER - Connecting LOng and Short-distance networks for Efficient tRansport.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. European Center for Government Transformation, (2015) Boosting innovation in cities to deliver better public services - A view from tomorrow’s leaders. College of Europe student case studies, Final report.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. European Commission (2014) Living well, within the limits of our planet. 7th EAP - The New General Union Environment Action Programme to 2020.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Gogas, M. and Nathanail, E. (2014) Multilevel multicriteria design of intermodal transport Freight Center networks. International Conference on Engineering and Applied Sciences Optimization (OPTi 2014), Kos Island, Greece.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Järvi, T. and Nagel, I. (2013) Guidance and recommendations for interconnection between long distance and local/regional passenger transport. Deliverable 6.1. CLOSER - Connecting LOng and Short-distance networks for Efficient tRansport.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Li, S. and Li, J.Z. (2009) Hybridising human judgment, AHP, simulation and a fuzzy expert system for strategy formulation under uncertainty. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 36 2009, 5557-5564.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Nathanail, E. and Gogas, M. (2005) Spatial planning - Development of nodal points and terminals. Deliverable 4. IMONODE - Efficient Integration of cargo transport MOdes and NODEs in CADSES area.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Nathanail, E. (2007) Developing an integrated logistics terminal network in the CADSES area.Transition Studies Review, May 2007, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 125-146.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Nathanail, E.G., Gogas, M.A. and Papoutsis, K.N. (2014) Investigation of Stakeholders’ View towards the introduction of ICT in Supply Chain using Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Traffic and Logistics Engineering, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 113-119.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Perez, D.H. (2013) Supply Chain Roadmap: aligning supply chain with business strategy. ISBN 978-1494200497.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Rodrigue, J.P., Comtois, C. and Slack, B. (2009) The "Last Mile" in Freight Distribution. The Geography of Transport Systems (2nd ed.), Routledge. p. 212. ISBN 978-0-415-48323-0.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Saaty, T. (1972) An eigenvalue allocation model for prioritization and planning. In working paper Energy Management and Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, 1972.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Saaty, T. (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 15 1977, pp. 234-281.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Scott, M. (2009) Improving Freight Movement in Delaware Central Business Districts. Institute for Public Administration, University of Delaware.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Taniguchi, E., Thompson, R.G. and Yamada, T. (1999) Modeling city logistics. In: City Logistics I (E. Taniguchi and R.G. Thompson, eds.), Institute of Systems Science Research, Kyoto, pp. 3-37.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Woudsma, C., Jensen, J., Karoglou, P. and Maoh, H. (2007) Logistics land use and the city: A spatialtemporal modeling approach. Transportation Research Part E, 44, 277-297.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Zahir, S. (1999) Clusters in group: Decision making in the vector space formulation of the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 112: 620-634.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ttj-2016-0021 | Journal eISSN: 1407-6179 | Journal ISSN: 1407-6160
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 231 - 241
Published on: Jun 28, 2016
Published by: Transport and Telecommunication Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Freight terminals,
last mile,
key performance indicators,
multi-stakeholder,
multi-criteria,
sensitivy analysis,
AHP,
PROMETHEE,
GAIA
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Introductions and overviews,
Engineering, other

© 2016 Eftihia Nathanail, Michael Gogas, Giannis Adamos, published by Transport and Telecommunication Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 17 (2016): Issue 3 (September 2016)
Previous article
Next article