Have a personal or library account? Click to login
North European Export Industry and the Shadows of Sulphur Directive Cover

North European Export Industry and the Shadows of Sulphur Directive

Transport and Telecommunication Journal
Volume 17 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)
By: Esa Hämäläinen,  Olli-Pekka Hilmola and  Andres Tolli  
Open Access
|Feb 2016

References

  1. 1. Alhosalo, M. (2013) Shipowners Barometer. Publications from the Centre for Maritime Studies, University of Turku, B 197, Turku, Finland.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Anonymous (2014) Interviews of logistics management of two large paper companies.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Arlbjørn, J.S., Jonsson, P., and Johansen, J. (2008) Nordic research in logistics and supply chain management: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 6: 452–474.10.1108/09600030810893526
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Bruckner-Menchelli, N. (2009) Scrubbers versus Distillates. Sustainable shipping p. 24.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Bruckner-Menchelli, N. (2011) US Navy Targets 2016 for Green Fuel use. Sustainable Shipping. Petromedia Ltd., URL: http://www.sustainableshipping.com
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Bunkerworld (2015) Bunker prices. Rotterdam, URL: http://www.bunkerworld.com/prices/port/nl/rtm/
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Cullinane, K. (2012) Chapter 4 An International Dimension: Shipping. In: Tim Ryley, Lee Chapman (eds.) Transport and Climate Change (Transport and Sustainability). Vol. 2, pp. 65-104.10.1108/S2044-9941(2012)0000002007
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. CME Group (2014) Crude Oil Futures Quotes, URL: http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/energy/crude-oil/light-sweet-crude.html
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Diesen, M. (1998) Economics of the Pulp and Paper Industry. Gummerus Oy, Jyväskylä.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Dieter, M. and Englert, H. (2007) Competitiveness in the global forest industry sector: an empirical study with special emphasis on Germany. European Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 126, pp. 401-412.10.1007/s10342-006-0159-x
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Einemo, U. (2013) Methanol Sea Trial Expected to Start this Month. Sustainable Shipping. Petromedia Ltd., <http://www.sustainableshipping.com>.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Entec (2010) Study to Review Assessments Undertaken of the Revised MARPOL Annex VI Regulations, Commissioned by the Shipowners’ Associations of Belgium, Finland, Germany, Holland, Sweden and the UK, London.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. European Shortsea Network (2014) ESN – Way Forward SECA report.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. EU (2005) DIRECTIVE 2005/33/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 6 July 2005 amending Directive 1999/32/EC as regards the sulphur content of marine fuels. Brussels, Belgium.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 15. EU (2012) DIRECTIVE 2012/33/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 21 November 2012 amending Council Directive 1999/32/EC as regards the sulphur content of marine fuels, Brussels, Belgium.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. FOEX (2015) Latest PIX index values with comments, URL: http://www.foex.fi/index.php?page=pix-pulp (accessed 28.February.2015).
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Forestindustries (2013) The Finnish Forest Industry in Figures. URL: http://www.forestindustries.fi/statistics/The-Finnish-forest-industry-in-figures-1274.html
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Forslid, R., Haaland, J., Midelfart, I., and Knarvik, K. H. (2002) A U-Shaped Europe? A simulation study of industrial location. Journal of International Economics, Vol. 57, pp. 273-297.10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00155-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Gallagher, T.L. (2010) Maersk to run biodiesel test. Journal of Commerce Online. Journal of Commerce, New York. URL: http://www.joc.com/maritime-news/maersk-run-biodiesel-test_20100304.html
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Head, K., and Mayer, T. (2004) The empirics of agglomeration and trade. In: Henderson, V., Thisse, J.-F. (eds.): Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. 4. North Holland, Amsterdam.10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80016-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Hilmola, O.-P. (2013) Environmental and infrastructure payments and the future of road transports: case Tallinn-Warsaw. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research, 4:1, pp. 55-72.10.1504/WRITR.2013.053369
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Hilmola, Olli-Pekka (2014) Growth drivers of Finnish-Estonian general cargo transports. Fennia – International Journal of Geography, 192:2, pp. 100-119.10.11143/41327
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Hilmola, Olli-Pekka (2015) Shipping sulphur regulation, freight transportation prices and diesel markets in the Baltic Sea Region. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 9:1, pp. 120-132.10.1108/IJESM-11-2013-0001
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Hjelle, H.M. (2010) Short sea shipping’s green label at risk. Transport Reviews, 30:5, pp. 617-640.10.1080/01441640903289849
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Hjelle, H.M., Fridell, E. (2010) When is short sea shipping environmentally competitive? International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME) Conference, Lisbon, 7–9 July, 1–18.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Holmgren, J., Nikopoulou, Z., Ramstedt, L., Woxenius, J. (2014) Modelling modal choice effects of regulation on low-sulphur marine fuels in Northern Europe. Transportation Research Part D, 28, pp. 62-7310.1016/j.trd.2013.12.009
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Hämäläinen, E. (2011a) Cost efficiency of supply chain in a Nordic paper mill – A case study. International Journal of Management, 28:3, pp. 945–958.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Hämäläinen, E. (2011b) Economic geographical analysis of the Finnish paper industry. Annales Universitatis Turkuensis, SER A11 – TOM, 263. Turku, Finland.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Hämäläinen, E. (2011c) Economic geographic characteristics in the Finnish paper industry − a case study. Fennia – International Journal of Geography, 189:2, pp. 63-75.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. 30. Hämäläinen, E., and Tapaninen, U. (2008) Spatial characteristics of the transports in the paper mill’s supply chain. Fennia – International Journal of Geography, 186:2, pp. 83–93.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. 31. Hämäläinen, E., and Tapaninen, U. (2010) Economics of a Nordic paper mill – case study. Industrial management and Data Systems, 110:1, pp. 5-23.10.1108/02635571011008371
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. 32. Hämäläinen, E., and Tapaninen, U. (2011) Accuracy of forecasting in a Nordic paper mill’s supply chain: A case study. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography, 65:2, pp. 104–113.10.1080/00291951.2011.574321
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. 33. Hämäläinen, Esa, Olli-Pekka Hilmola & Lauri Hetemäki (2015) Fluctuating demand and its impacts to a paper producer: customer analysis. Expert Systems with Applications (forthcoming).10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.014
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. 34. IMO (2014) International Maritime Organization, Sulphur oxides (SOx) – Regulation 14, URL: http://www.imo.org/OurWork/Environment/PollutionPrevention/AirPollution/Pages/Sulphur-oxides-(SOx)-–-Regulation-14.aspx
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. 35. ISL (2010) Reducing the sulphur content of shipping fuels further to 0.1% in the North Sea and Baltic Sea in 2015: Consequencs for Shipping in this Area, Commissioned by the German Shipowners’ Association and Association of German Seaport Operators. Institute of Shipping Economics and Logistics, Bremen.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. 36. Jiang, L., Kronbak, J., and Christensen, L. P. (2014) The costs and benefits of sulphur reduction measures: Sulphur scrubbers versus marine gas oil. Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 28, pp. 19–27.10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.005
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. 37. Kalli, J. (2012) Päivitys: Laivapolttoaineiden rikkipitoisuus vuonna 2015, Selvitys IMO:n uusien määräysten vaikutuksesta kuljetuskustannuksiin. Turun yliopisto, Merenkulkualan koulutus ja tutkimuskeskus.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. 38. Kalli, J., Tapio, K. and Teemu, M. (2009) Sulphur content in ships bunker fuel in 2015: a study on the impacts of the new IMO regulations and transportation costs. Ministry of Transport and Communications, No. 31, Helsinki, Finland.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. 39. Koskinen, P. (2009) Supply chain strategy in a global paper manufacturing company: a case study. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 109:1, pp. 34-52.10.1108/02635570910926582
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. 40. Koskinen, P., Hilmola, O-P. (2008) Supply chain challenges of North-European paper industry. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 108:2, pp. 208-227.10.1108/02635570810847581
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. 41. Krugman, P. (1995) Development, Geography, and Economic Theory Returns and Economic Geography, The MIT Press, Boston.10.7551/mitpress/2389.001.0001
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. 42. Lähtinen, K. (2007) Linking resource-based view with business economics of woodworking industry: earlier findings and future insights. Silva Fennica, 41:1, pp. 149-165.10.14214/sf.312
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. 43. Nordea (2013) New forecasts: Oil prices creep higher, URL: http://research.nordeamarkets.com/en/2013/03/19/new-forecasts-oil-prices-creep-higher/
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. 44. Notteboom, T. (2011) The impact of low sulphur fuel requirements in shipping on the competitiveness of roro shipping in Northern Europe. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 10:1, pp. 63-95.10.1007/s13437-010-0001-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. 45. Notteboom, T., Delhaye, E., and Vanherle, K. (2010) Analysis of the Consequences of Low Sulphur Fuel Requirements. Report commissioned by European Community Shipowners’ Associations (ECSA).
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. 46. RISI (2015) Resource Information Systems Inc. Database for Pulp and Paper, available at URL: http://www.risiinfo.com/ (accessed 28.February.2015).
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. 47. Swedish Forest Industries Federation (2009) Information Paper – Consequences for the Pulp and Paper Industry due to New Sulphur Regulations for Ships, 18 June 2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. 48. The Finnish Transport Safety Agency (2013) Merenkulun uusien ympäristömääräysten aiheuttamien kustannusten kartoittaminen, Liikenteen turvallisuusvirasto (Finnish Transport Safety Agency) julkaisuja, 24/2013.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. 49. Weber, A. (1909) Über den Standort der Industrien. Tübingen. English translation by Freidrich, C.J. 1929. Alfred Weber’s Theory of Location of Industries. University of Chicago Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ttj-2016-0002 | Journal eISSN: 1407-6179 | Journal ISSN: 1407-6160
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 9 - 17
Published on: Feb 22, 2016
Published by: Transport and Telecommunication Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Sulphur,
Transportation,
Paper industry,
IMO,
Sea freights
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Introductions and overviews,
Engineering, other

© 2016 Esa Hämäläinen, Olli-Pekka Hilmola, Andres Tolli, published by Transport and Telecommunication Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 17 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)Next article