Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Proposal Of Landfill Site Model In The Particular Territory Cover

Proposal Of Landfill Site Model In The Particular Territory

By: Ondrej Stopka and  Ivana Simková  
Open Access
|Nov 2015

References

  1. 1. Brožova, H., Houška, M., Šubrt, T. (2003) Modely pro vícekriteriální rozhodování. Česká zemědělská univerzita v Praze, Prague: CREDIT, ISBN 80-213-1019-7, 178 p.
  2. 2. Bonissone, P. P. (1998) Determination of Weight Vector (cardinal ratio scale) from Pairwise Comparisons. [online].
  3. 3. Eko-Kom. (2011) Municipal waste. [online]. Prague. Available at: http://www.ekokom.cz.
  4. 4. Fotr, J. et al. (2006) Manažerské rozhodování, Vyd. 1. Praha: Ekopress, ISBN 80-86929-15-9. 409 p.
  5. 5. Kampf, R., Gašparík, J., Kudláčková, N. (2012) Application of different forms of transport in relation to the process of transport user value creation. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 40(2), pp. 71 – 75.10.3311/pp.tr.2012-2.05
  6. 6. Kampf, R., Lizbetin, J., Lizbetinova, L. (2012) Requirements of a transport system user. Communications, 14(4), pp. 106-108.10.26552/com.C.2012.4.106-108
  7. 7. Klein, G. A. et al. (1993) Decision making in action: Models and methods. Westport, CT, US: Ablex Publishing, 480 p.
  8. 8. Míka, J., Kučerková, M. (2014) Logistics of the Disposal of Municipal Waste. In: LOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, Institut Jana Pernera, o.p.s., and Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice, Czech Republic, 1/2014, ISSN 1804-3216, pp. 88-92.
  9. 9. Saaty, T. L. (1983) Priority Setting in Complex Problems, in Hansen, P. (Hrg.), Essays and Surveys on Multiple Criteria Decision Making. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Berlin/Heidelberg/NewYork: Springer-Verlag, pp. 140-155.
  10. 10. Saaty, T. L. (1986) Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science, 32(7), pp. 841-847.10.1287/mnsc.32.7.841
  11. 11. Saaty, T. L. (1990) Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 292 p.
  12. 12. Saaty, T. L. (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), pp. 83-98.10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
  13. 13. Saaty, T. L., Vargas, L. G., Wendell, R. E. (1983) Assessing Attribute Weights by Ratios. Omega - The International Journal of Management Science, 2(1), pp. 9-13.
  14. 14. Waste Management. (2012) Waste Management Information System. [online]. Available at: http://www1.cenia.cz/www/odpady/isoh.
  15. 15. Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2011) Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17(2), ISSN 2029-4913, pp. 397-427.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ttj-2015-0029 | Journal eISSN: 1407-6179 | Journal ISSN: 1407-6160
Language: English
Page range: 320 - 329
Published on: Nov 24, 2015
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2015 Ondrej Stopka, Ivana Simková, published by Transport and Telecommunication Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.