Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Loss of Grammatical Gender and Case Features Between Old and Early Middle English: Its Impact on Simple Demonstratives and Topic Shift Cover

The Loss of Grammatical Gender and Case Features Between Old and Early Middle English: Its Impact on Simple Demonstratives and Topic Shift

By: Rafał Jurczyk  
Open Access
|Dec 2017

References

  1. Hall, Joseph. 1920. Selections from Early Middle English, 1130-1250, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/actrade/9780198111078.book.1
  2. Morris, Richard (ed.). 1868–1873. Old English homilies and homiletic treatises. EETS OS 29, 34, 53. London: Trübner.
  3. Plummer, Charles & John Earle (eds). 1892–1889. Two of the Saxon chronicles parallel. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  4. Sweet, Henry (ed.). 1871. King Alfred's West-Saxon version of Gregory's Pastoral Care. EETS OS 45, 50. London: Oxford University Press.
  5. Thorpe, Benjamin (ed.). 1844. The homilies of the Anglo-Saxon church: The first part containing the Sermones Catholici, or homilies of Ælfric. 2 vols. London: Ælfric Society.
  6. Abraham, Werner. 2007. Discourse binding: DP and pronouns in German, Dutch, and English. In Elisabeth Stark, Elisabeth Leiss & Werner Abraham (eds.), Nominal determination: Typology, context constraints, and historical emergence, 21–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/slcs.89.04abr10.1075/slcs.89.04abr
  7. Adger, David. 2003. Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199243709.001.0001
  8. Adger, David & Peter Svenonius. 2009. Features in Minimalist syntax. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/000825 (accessed on 19 December, 2015)
  9. Alexiadou, Artemis, Liliane Haegeman & Melita Stavrou. 2007. Noun phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207491
  10. Allen, Cynthia L. 1995. Case marking and reanalysis: Grammatical relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oso/9780198240969.001.0001
  11. Allen, Cynthia L. 2006. Possessives and determiners in Old English. In Terttu Nevalainen, Juhani Klemola & Mikko Laitinen (eds.), Types of variation: Diachronic, dialectal and typological interfaces, 149–170. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/slcs.76.09all10.1075/slcs.76.09all
  12. Allen, Cynthia L. 2012. Why a determiner? The Possessive + Determiner + Adjective construction in Old English. In Anneli Meurman-Solin, Maria José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English, 245–270. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860210.003.001110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860210.003.0011
  13. Baker, Mark C. 2008. The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511619830
  14. Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2001. The perplexity of Dat-Nom verbs in Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 24(1). 47–70. DOI: 10.1080/0332586011773010.1080/03325860117730
  15. Bartnik, Artur. 2007. Categorial heterogenity: Old English determiners. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 43. 75–96.
  16. Bartnik, Artur. 2011. Noun Phrase structure in Old English. Quantifiers and other functional categories. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
  17. Bech, Kristin. 2012. Word order, information structure, and discourse relations: A study of Old and Middle English verb-final clauses. In Anneli Meurman-Solin, Maria José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English, 65–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860210.003.000410.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860210.003.0004
  18. Bech, Kristin & Christine M. Salvesen. 2014. Preverbal word order in Old English and Old French. In Kristin Bech & Kristine G. Eide (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in Germanic and Romance languages, 233–270. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/la.213.09bec10.1075/la.213.09bec
  19. Beghelli, Filippo & Tim Stowell. 1994. The direction of quantifier movement. GLOW Newsletter 32. 56–57.
  20. Bellmann, Günter. 1990. Pronomen und Korrektur. Zur Pragmalinguistik der persönlichen Referenzformen. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110866100
  21. Biberauer, Theresa & Ian Roberts. 2010. Subjects, Tense, and verb-agreement. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, 263-302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511770784.008
  22. Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.). 2010. Parametric variation: Null subjects in Minimalist theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511770784
  23. Billet, Jesse D. 2014. The divine office in Anglo-Saxon England, 597–c.1000. London: Henry Bradshaw Society.
  24. Blake, Barry, J. 1994. Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Boeckx, Cedric. 2000. Quirky agreement. Studia Linguistica 54(3). 354–380. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9582.0007010.1111/1467-9582.00070
  26. Bohnacker, Ute & Christina Rosén. 2007. How to start a V2 declarative clause: Transfer of syntax vs. information structure in L2 German. Nordlyd 34(3). 29–56. DOI: 10.7557/12.12210.7557/12.122
  27. Bondaruk, Anna & Bogdan Szymanek. 2007. Polish nominativeless constructions with dative Experiencers: Form, meaning and structure. Studies in Polish Linguistics 4. 61–97.
  28. Bošković, Željko. 2011. On unvalued uninterpretable features. In Suzi Lima, Kevin Mullin & Brian Smith (eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistics Society. 109–120. Amherst: Department of Linguistics.
  29. Breban, Tine. 2012. Functional shifts and the development of English determiners. In Anneli Meurman-Solin, Maria José Lpez-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English, 271–300. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860210.003.001210.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860210.003.0012
  30. Brugè, Laura. 2002. The positions of demonstratives in the extended nominal projection. In Guglielmo Cinque (ed.), Functional structure in DP and IP. The cartography of syntactic structures, 15–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195148794.003.0002
  31. Brunner, Karl. 1963. An outline of Middle English grammar (translated by Grahame Johnson). Oxford: Blackwell.
  32. Carstens, Vicki. 1993. Deriving agreement. Invited talk. Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.
  33. Carstens, Vicki. 2010. Implications of grammatical gender for the theory of uninterpretable features. In Michael Putnam (ed.), Exploring crash-proof grammars, 31–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lfab.3.03car
  34. Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.
  35. Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York, NY: Praeger.
  36. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  37. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004
  38. Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, 104–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195171976.003.0004
  39. Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory. Essays in honour of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 134–166. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.000710.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007
  40. Citko, Barbara. 2014. Phase theory. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139644037
  41. Crisma, Paola. 2011. The emergence of the definite article in English. A contact-induced change? In Petra Sleeman & Harry Perridon (eds.), The Noun Phrase in Romance and Germanic: Structure, variation, and change, 175–192. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/la.171.13cri10.1075/la.171.13cri
  42. Danon, Gabi. 2011. Agreement and DP-internal feature distribution. Syntax 14(4). 297–317. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9612.2011.00154.x10.1111/j.1467-9612.2011.00154.x
  43. Diamond, Robert E. 1970. Old English grammar & reader. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
  44. Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, function and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/tsl.4210.1075/tsl.42
  45. Domenico, Elisa di. 1997. Per una teoria del genere grammatical. Padova: Unipress.
  46. Eitler, Tamás & Marit Westergaard. 2014. Word order variation in late Middle English: The effect of information structure and audience design. In Kristin Bech & Kristine G. Eide (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in Germanic and Romance languages, 203–232. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/la.213.08eit10.1075/la.213.08eit
  47. Embick, David & Rolf Noyer. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32(4). 555–595. DOI: 10.1162/00243890175337300510.1162/002438901753373005
  48. Farkas, Donka F. & Henriëtte de Swart. 2007. Article choice in plural generics. Lingua 117(9). 1657–1676. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.06.01110.1016/j.lingua.2006.06.011
  49. Farkas, Donka F. & Klaus von Heusinger. 2003. Stability of reference and object marking in Romanian. Paper presented at Workshop on direct Reference and Specificity (ESSLI), Vienna, August 2003.
  50. Fischer, Olga, Ans van Kemenade, Willem Koopman & Wim van der Wurff. 2000. The syntax of Early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO978051161231210.1017/CBO9780511612312
  51. Fisiak, Jacek. 1968. A short grammar of Middle English. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  52. Fulk, Richard D. 2012. An introduction to Middle English: Grammar and texts. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.
  53. Gelderen, Elly van. 2011a. The diachrony of pronouns and demonstratives. http://www.public.asu.edu/~gelderen/JT-FS-August-2011.pdf (accessed on 11 January 2016).
  54. Gelderen, Elly van. 2011b. The linguistic cycle: Language change and the language faculty. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.001.0001
  55. Gelderen, Elly van. 2014. Semantic and formal features: Feature economy in language change. In Chiara Gianollo, Agnes Jäger & Doris Penka (eds.), Language change at the syntax-semantics interface, 33–56. Berlin & Munich: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110352306.3310.1515/9783110352306.33
  56. Gerritsen, Marinel. 2002. Towards a more gender-fair usage in Netherlands Dutch. In Marlis Hellinger & Hadumod Buβmann (eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men, vol. 2, 81–108. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/impact.10.10ger10.1075/impact.10.10ger
  57. Giusti, Giuliana. 2001. The birth of a functional category: From Latin ille to the Romance article and personal pronoun. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), 157–171. Current studies in Italian syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi. Amsterdam: North Holland.10.1163/9780585473949_010
  58. Hale, Kenneth & Maria Bittner. 1996. The structural determination of case and agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 27. 1–68.
  59. Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20. 111–176. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  60. Harley, Heidi & Rolf Noyer. 1999. Distributed morphology. Glot International 4(4). 3–9.
  61. Hinterwimmer, Stefan. 2014. A unified account of the properties of demonstrative pronouns in German. https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxzdGVmYW5oaW50ZXJ3aW1tZXJ8Z3g6N2EzMTJjNWExYWVlYmEwOQ (accessed on 12 March 2016).
  62. Hockett, Charles F. 1958. A course in modern linguistics. New York, NY: Macmillan.
  63. Hogg, Richard M. 2002. An introduction to Old English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  64. Hogg, Richard M. & Robert D. Fulk. 2011. A grammar of Old English: Morphology. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781444327472
  65. Howe, Stephen. 1996. The personal pronouns in the Germanic languages: A study of personal pronoun morphology and change in the Germanic languages from the first records to the present day. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110819205
  66. Inokuma, Sakumi. 2013. Distribution of phi-features within DPs and the activity condition. English Linguistics 30(1). 292–312. DOI: 10.9793/elsj.30.1_29210.9793/elsj.30.1_292
  67. Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 2003. Not so quirky: On subject case in Icelandic. In Ellen Brandner & Heike Zinsmeister (eds.), New perspectives in case theory, 127–164. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
  68. Josefsson, Gunlög. 2013. Gender in Scandinavian: On the gender systems in Mainland Scandinavian, with focus on Swedish. http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001966 (accessed on 21 December 2015)
  69. Jurczyk, Rafał. 2015. The logical-semantic content of subject: A configurational view from syntax and LF. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 51(1). 89–131. DOI: 10.1515/psicl-2015-000410.1515/psicl-2015-0004
  70. Kemenade, Ans van & Marit Westergaard. 2012. Syntax and information structure: Verb-second variation in Middle English. In Anneli Meurman-Solin, Maria José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English, 87–118. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860210.003.000510.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860210.003.0005
  71. Kibrik, Andrej A. 2011. Reference in discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199215805.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199215805.001.0001
  72. Kiss, Katalin É. 2002. The EPP in a topic-prominent language. In Peter Svenonius (ed.), Subjects, expletives, and the EPP, 107–124. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195142242.003.0005
  73. Klijs, Gerard P. C. 2013. The use of demonstratives in Dutch telephone conversations: Comparing the traditional view on demonstratives with recent insights. Utrecht: University of Utrecht M.A. Thesis. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/276688
  74. Koeneman, Olaf. 2000. The flexible nature of verb movement. Utrecht: University of Utrecht Ph.D. Dissertation. https://www.lotpublications.nl/the-flexible-nature-of-verb-movement-the-flexible-nature-of-verb-movement
  75. Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor. 1997. Verb movement in Old and Middle English: Dialect variation and language contact. In Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 297–325. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  76. Kuno, Masakazu. 2011. Separating feature interpretability from feature values: Evidence from negative concord in Japanese. Generative Grammar in Geneva 7. 23–32.
  77. Laing, Margaret. 1993. Catalogue of sources for a linguistic atlas of Early Medieval English. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.
  78. Lavine, James E. & Robert Freidin. 2002. The subject of defective T(ense) in Slavic. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 10(1-2). 251–287.
  79. Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 25(4). 609–665.
  80. Los, Bettelou. 2012. The loss of verb-second and the switch from bounded to unbounded systems. In Anneli Meurman-Solin, Maria José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English, 21–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860210.003.000210.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860210.003.0002
  81. Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO978051160578910.1017/CBO9780511605789
  82. Malak, Janusz. 2008. Derivational conspiracy: The demise of subjectless clauses in English. Opole: Uniwersytet Opolski.
  83. Markus, Manfred. 1995. On the growing role of semantic and pragmatic features in Middle English. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Linguistic change under contact conditions, 161–178. Berlin: Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9783110885170.16110.1515/9783110885170.161
  84. Millar, Robert McColl. 2000. System collapse - system rebirth: The demonstrative pronouns of English 900-1350 and the rise of the definite article. Bern: Peter Lang AG.
  85. Moro, Andrea. 2008. The boundaries of Babel: The brain and the enigma of impossible languages. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9710.7551/mitpress/97
  86. Neeleman, Ad & Fred Weerman. 2001. Flexible syntax: A theory of case and arguments. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
  87. Nevins, Andrew. 2004. Derivations without the Activity Condition. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 49. 287–310.
  88. Nossalik, Larissa. 2005. The A/A’-status of Russian scrambling. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 19(2). 65–102.
  89. Osawa, Fuyo. 2007. The emergence of DP from a perspective of ontogeny and phylogeny: Correlation between DP, TP and aspect in Old English and first language acquisition. In Elisabeth Stark, Elisabeth Leiss & Werner Abraham (eds.), Nominal determination: Typology, context constraints, and historical emergence, 311–337. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/slcs.89.17osa10.1075/slcs.89.17osa
  90. Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy K. Wilkins (eds.), Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation, In honor of Joseph E. Emonds, 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/la.101.14pes10.1075/la.101.14pes
  91. Picallo, M. 2008. Gender and number in Romance. Lingue e Linguaggio 7(1). 47–66.
  92. Pinker, Steven. 1994. The language instinct. New York, NY: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.10.1037/e412952005-009
  93. Radford, Andrew. 2004. Minimalist syntax. Exploring the structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO978051181131910.1017/CBO9780511811319
  94. Ralli, Angela. 2003. Morphology in Greek linguistics: The state of the art. Journal of Greek Linguistics 4(1). 77–129. DOI: 10.1075/jgl.4.09ral10.1075/jgl.4.09ral
  95. Ritter, Elisabeth. 1991. Two functional categories in noun phrases: Evidence from Modern Hebrew. In Susan Rothstein (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 25. Perspectives on phrase structure: Heads and licensing. 37–62. London: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004373198_004
  96. Ritter, Elisabeth. 1993. Where’s gender? Linguistic Inquiry 24(3). 795–803.10.1016/0026-2692(93)90078-S
  97. Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax. 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7
  98. Roberts Ian & Anna Roussou. 2002. The Extended Projection Principle as a condition on the tense dependency. In Peter Svenonius (ed.), Subjects, expletives, and the EPP, 125–156. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195142242.003.0006
  99. Rohrbacher, Bernard. 1994. Notes on the antisymmetry of syntax. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 1(1). 111–128. http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol1/iss1/8/
  100. Salverda, Reinier. 1982. On the problem of topicalization in Dutch. Voortgang 3. 244–256.
  101. Sheehan, Michelle & Wolfram Hinzen. 2011. Moving towards the edge. Linguistic Analysis 37. 405–458.
  102. Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1996. Icelandic finite verb agreement. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 57. 1–46.
  103. Stutterheim, Christiane von & Mary Carroll. 2005. Subjektwahl und Topikkontinuität im Deutschen und Englischen. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 35(3). 7–27. DOI: 10.1007/BF0337944110.1007/BF03379441
  104. Svenonius, Peter (ed.). 2002. Subjects, expletives, and the EPP. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195142242.001.0001
  105. Tajsner, Przemysław. 1998. XP-fronting in Polish. Papers and Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 34. 75–99.
  106. Tajsner, Przemysław. 2012. Minimalizm z perspektywy biolingwistyki. In Piotr Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Studia z metodologii i filozofii językoznawstwa: Współczesne językoznawstwo generatywne. Podstawy metodologiczne, 87–116. Łódź: Primum Verbum.
  107. Tappe, Hans Thilo. 1990. Determiner phrases and agreement in German. Unpublished manuscript: University of Göttingen.
  108. Taylor, Ann & Susan Pintzuk. 2014. Testing the theory: Information structure in Old English. In Kristin Bech & Kristine G. Eide (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in Germanic and Romance languages, 53–78. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/la.213.03tay10.1075/la.213.03tay
  109. Toman, Jindrich. 1994. Case as a functional projection: A note on an issue in parametrization. In Jindrich Toman (ed.), Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Ann Arbor meeting. Functional categories in Slavic syntax, 173–181. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.
  110. Trips, Carola. 2002. From OV to VO in Early Middle English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/la.6010.1075/la.60
  111. Ura, Hiroyuki. 2000. Checking theory and grammatical functions in universal grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195118391.001.0001
  112. Valois, Daniel. 1991. The internal syntax of DP. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Ph.D. dissertation.
  113. Vangsnes, Øystein A. 2002. Icelandic expletive constructions and the distribution of subject types. In Peter Svenonius (ed.), Subjects, expletives, and the EPP, 43–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195142242.003.0003
  114. Watanabe, Akira. 2009. A parametric shift in the D-system in Early Middle English: Relativization, articles, adjectival inflection, and indeterminates. In Paola Crisma & Giuseppe Longobardi (eds.), Historical syntax and linguistic theory, 358-374. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199560547.003.002110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199560547.003.0021
  115. Wyatt, Alfred J. 1897. An elementary Old English reader (early West Saxon). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  116. Willim, Ewa. 2012. O przyczynach zmian głównych kierunków badawczych w gramatyce generatywnej Noama Chomsky’ego (1957-2007). In Piotr Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Studia z metodologii i filozofii językoznawstwa: Współczesne językoznawstwo generatywne. Podstawy metodologiczne, 18–86. Łódź: Primum Verbum.
  117. Wiltschko, Martina. 1998. On the syntax and semantics of (relative) pronouns and determiners. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2(2). 143–181. DOI: 10.1023/A:100971922999210.1023/A:1009719229992
  118. Wood, Johanna L. 2007. Demonstratives and possessives: From Old English to present-day English. In Elisabeth Stark, Elisabeth Leiss & Werner Abraham (eds.), Nominal determination: Typology, context constraints, and historical emergence, 339–361. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/slcs.89.18woo10.1075/slcs.89.18
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/stap-2017-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2082-5102 | Journal ISSN: 0081-6272
Language: English
Page range: 203 - 250
Published on: Dec 29, 2017
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2017 Rafał Jurczyk, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.