BACKWARD INDUCTION: MERITS AND FLAWS
References
- Basu, K. (1988). Strategic Irrationality in Extensive Games. Mathematical Social Sciences 15: 247-260. - (1990). On the Non-Existence of a Rationality Definition for Extensive Games. International Journal of Game Theory 9: 33-44.
- Binmore, K. (1987). Modeling Rational Players, Part 1. Economics and Philosophy 3: 179-214. - Modeling Rational Players, Part 2. (1988). Economics and Philosophy 4: 9-55. 10.1017/S0266267100002893
- Bonanno, G. (1991). The Logic of Rational Play in Games of Perfect Information. Economics and Philosophy 7: 31-65.
- Cournot, A. (1838). Recherches sur les principes math´ematiques de la th´eorie des richesses. Paris: Chez L. Hachette.
- Flood, M. (1952). Some experimental games. RAND memorandum. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/researchmemoranda/2008/RM789-1.pdf.
- Fudenberg, D. and J. Tirole. (1991). Game Theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Gardner, M. (1963). The Paradox of the Unexpected Hanging. Scientific American 3.
- Kaminski, M.M. (2009). Backward Induction and Subgame Perfection. IMBS working paper, University of California, Irvine, 09-01.
- Kaminski, M.M. and Nalepa M.A. (2014). A Model of Strategic Preemption: Why do Post-Communists Hurt Themselves? Decisions 21: 31-65.
- Kuhn, H.W. (1953). Extensive Games and the Problem of Information. In H.W. Kuhn, and A.W. Tucker (Eds.), Contributions to the Theory of Games 1 (pp. 193-216). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Myerson, R. (1991). Game Theory. Analysis of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Petit, P. and Sugden, R. (1989). The Backward Induction Paradox. Economics and Philosophy 14: 95-125.
- Romer, T. and Rosenthal, H. (1978) Political Resource Allocation, Controlled Agendas, and the Status Quo. Public Choice 33: 27-44. 10.1007/BF03187594
- Rosenthal, R.W. (1981). Games of Perfect Information, Predatory Pricing, and the Chain-Store Paradox, Journal of Economic Theory 25: 92-100. 10.1016/0022-0531(81)90018-1
- Schelling, T.C. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press.
- Schwalbe, U. and Walker, P. (2001). Zermelo and the Early History of Game Theory. Games and Economic Behavior 34: 123-137.
- Selten, R. (1965). Spieltheoretische Behandlung Eines Oligopolmodels Mit Nachfragetr ¨agheit. Zeitschrift f¨ur die gesampte Staatswissenschaft (pp. 667-689). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck GmbH & Co. KG. Selten, R. (1975). Reexamination of the Perfectness Concept for Equilibrium Points in Extensive Games. International Journal of Game Theory 4(1): 25-55.
- Selten, R. (1978). The Chain Store Paradox. Theory and Decision. 9: 127-159.
- Stackelberg, H.F.V. (1934). Marktform Und Gleichgewicht (Market Structure and Equilibrium). Vienna: J. Springer.
- Tucker, A. W. (1950). A two-person dilemma. Mimeographed paper, Stanford University. Published in 1980 as: On jargon: The prisoner’s dilemma. UMAP Journal 1:101.
- von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Zermelo, E. (1913). ¨Uber Eine Anwendung Der Mengenlehre Auf Die Theorie Des Schachspiels. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 501-504.
Language: English
Page range: 9 - 24
Published on: Oct 31, 2017
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2017 Marek M. Kamiński, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.