Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Polish, Greek and Cypriot Civil Procedure Terminology in Translation. A Parametric Approach

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
Volume 49 (2017): Issue 1 (March 2017)
By:
Open Access
|Apr 2017

References

  1. Bańczerowski, J. 2001. The Linguistic Legacy of Ludwik Zabrocki. In S. Puppel (ed.) The Ludwik Zabrocki Memorial Lecture. Suprema lex: cognoscere, legere, dispputare, docere, 9-49. Poznań: UAM.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Delisle J. et al. 1999 (eds.). Translation Terminology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Georgiades, A., and Chrysostomides, G. 2007. Comparative Study of “Residual Jurisdiction” in Civil and Commercial Disputes in the EU National Report for: Cyprus. Lex Mundi Project. http://ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/news/docs/studyresidjurisdcyprusen.pdf. (accessed on 10th of May 2015).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Gonzalés-Matthews, G. 2003, L’Equivalence en traduction juridique, Th`ese de Doctorat, Quebec City: Universit´e de Laval. http://archimede.bibl.ulaval.ca/archimede/fichiers/21362/21362.html (accessed on 10th of May 2015).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Gortych-Michalak, K. 2013a. Rola tłumacza w przekładzie polsko-greckim i greckopolskim. in D. Kondratczyk, A. Niewiadomski & E. Walewska (eds.) Polski język prawny - media, społeczeństwo, edukacja, 9-19. Warszawa: Zakład Graficzny Uniwersytetu warszawskiego.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Gortych-Michalak, K. 2013b. Struktura polskich, greckich i cypryjskich aktow normatywnych Studium porownawcze w aspekcie translatologicznym. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Contact.10.14746/cl.2013.14.04
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. de Groot, G.-R. 1987. The point of view of a comparative lawyer. Les Cachiers de droit. vol. 28, no 4, 793-812. Quebec City: Universit´e de Laval.10.7202/042842ar
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Hatzimihail, N. E. 2013. Cyprus as a Mixed Legal System. Journal of Civil Law Studies Volume 6 Issue 1 Summer 2013. Baton Rouge, Louisiana: Louisiana State University, Paul M. Hebert Law Center (CCLS).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Joseph, J.E. 1995. Interdeterminancy, Translation and the Law. In M. Morris (ed.) Translation and the Law 13-36. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Kierzkowska,D. 2008.Tłumaczenie prawnicze.Warszawa:Wydawnictwo Translegis.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Matulewska, A. 2013. Legilinguistic Translatology. A Parametric Approach to Legal Translation. Frankfurt am Mein: Peter Lang Publishibg House.10.3726/978-3-0351-0535-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Matulewska, A. 2014. In Quest of Sufficient Equivalence. Polish and English Insolvency terminology in Translation. A Comparative Study. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 38 (51) 2014. Białystok: University of Białystok.10.2478/slgr-2014-0038
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Neubert, A. 1996. Textlinguistics of Translation: The Textual Approach to Translation. In R. M. Gaddis (ed.), Translation Horizons Beyond the Boundaries of Translation Spectrum. Translation Perspectives IX, 87-105. Binghamton: Center for Research in Translation.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Reiss, K. 1971, M¨oglichkeiten und Grenzen der ¨Ubersetzungskritik. M¨unchen: Max Hueber.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Reiss, K. and Vermeer H. J. 1984. Grundlegung einer allgemeinen Translationstheorie. T¨ubingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783111351919
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Republic of Cyprus, Supreme Court of Cyprus http://www.supremecourt.gov.cy/judicial/sc.nsf/DMLSCourten/DMLSCourten?OpenDocument (accessed on 10th of May 2015).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Sandrini, P. 2009. The parameters of multilingual legal communication on globalized world. Comparative Legilinguistics. Vol 1/200. 34-48. Poznań: UAM.10.14746/cl.2009.01.03
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Šarčevič, S. ( 1997), New Approach to legal translation. Hague/London: London: Kluwer Law International.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Šarčevič, S. 2000, Legal Translation and Translation Theory: a Receiver oriented Approach, Legal translation: history, theory/ies and practice. International colloquium University of Geneva, February 17-19, 2000: [proceedings]. Berne: ASTTI, cop. 2000.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Vermeer, H. J. 1978. Ein Rahmen f¨ur eine allgemeine Translationstheorie. Lebende Sprachen 3: 99-102. Leipzig: De Gruyter.10.1515/les.1978.23.3.99
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Zabrocki, L. 1963. Wspolnoty komunikatywne w genezie i rozwoju języka niemieckiego. Część I. Prehistoria języka niemieckiego. Wrocław: Ossolineum.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2017-0005 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 73 - 88
Published on: Apr 26, 2017
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
legal terminology,
legal translation,
inter-legal translation,
interlingual translation,
civil procedure terminology,
legal language,
language of law,
comparative study on legal terminology
Related subjects:
Philosophy,
Philosophy, other

© 2017 Karolina Gortych-Michalak, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 49 (2017): Issue 1 (March 2017)Next article