Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Polish Preparatory Proceedings in Civil Cases: Written or Oral? Lessons to be Learned from Some Other Jurisdictions

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
Volume 45 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)
By:
Open Access
|Jul 2016

References

  1. ALI/UNIDROIT Principles of Transnational Civil Procedures. (2004). Retrieved from http://www.unidroit.org/english/principles/civilprocedure/ali-unidroitprinciples-e.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, N. (2005). The New English Civil Procedure Rules (1998). In C.H. van Rhee (Ed.), European Traditions in Civil Procedure, Antwerpen-Oxford: Intersentia, 161-181.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, N. (2008). The Modern Civil Process: Judicial and Alternative Forms of Dispute Resolution in England. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Andrews, N. (2012). The Three Paths of Justice: Court Proceedings, Arbitration, and Mediation in England. Dordrecht-Heidelberg-London-New York: Springer Science + Business Media.10.1007/978-94-007-2294-1
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Andrews, N. (2013). Civil Procedure. In A. Burrows (Ed.), English Private Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1324-1373.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Arkuszewska, A.M. & Kościołek, A. (2012). Nowelizacja Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego - wybrane zagadnienia. Cz. 1. Przegląd Sądowy 5, 5-14.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Backer, I.L. (2007). The Norwegian reform of civil procedure. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 41-75.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Cadiet, L. & Amrani-Mekki, S. (2008). Civil Procedure. In G.A. Bermann, E. Picard (Eds.), Introduction to French Law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 307-332.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Chase, O.G. & Varano, V. (2012). Comparative civil justice. In M. Bussani & U. Mattei (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Law. New York: Cambridge University Press, 210-240.10.1017/CBO9781139017206.013
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Civil Procedure Rules 1998. Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1998/3132/contents/made
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Clampitt, P.G., DeKoch, R.J. & Cashman, T. (2000). A strategy for communicating about uncertainty. Academy of Management Executive 14(4), 41-57.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Council Recommendations - “Promoting the use of and sharing of best practices on cross-border videoconferencing in the area of justice in the Member States and at EU level” (OJ C 250, 31.7.2015).
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Czerwiński, A. (2015). Mediacja z punktu widzenia sędziego. Retrieved from http://caim.gov.pl/images/user_media/40/O%20mediacji/Nowe/Mediacja%20z%20punktu%20widzenia%20s%C4%99dziego.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Draft Strategy on European e-justice 2014-2018 (OJ C 376, 21.12.2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Ekelöf, P.O. (1995). Scandinavian Countries. In M. Cappelletti (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. Volume XVI. Civil Procedure. Ordinary Proceedings in First Instance. Tübingen & The Hague-Boston- London: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) & Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 189-210.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Elliott C., Vernon C. & Jeanpierre E. (2006). French Legal System. Harlow: Pearson Education.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Ervo, L. (2009). Characteristics of procedure. In L. Ervo (Ed.), Civil Justice in Finland. Nagoya University Comparative Study of Civil Justice Vol. 2. Tokyo: Jigakusha Publishing Corporation, 55-100.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Ervo, L. (2014). East-Scandinavian court culture from the religious point of view - secularized or quasi secularized civil litigation? In A. Piszcz (Ed.), Court Culture - Contemporary Problems. Białystok Volumes on Law & Culture Vol. 1. Bialystok: Temida 2, 53-70.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Ervo, L. & Dahlqvist, A. (2014). Delays in civil proceedings: Comparative Studies Between Finland and Sweden, In L. Ervo, A. Nylund (Eds.), The Future of Civil Litigation: Access to Courts and Court-annexed Mediation in the Nordic Countries. Cham: Springer, 249-280.10.1007/978-3-319-04465-1_13
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Gonera, K. (2005). Przewlekłość postępowania w sprawach cywilnych. Przegląd Sądowy 11/12, 3-38.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Górowski, J. (2014). Art. 207. In A. Marciniak, K. Piasecki (Eds.), Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Tom I. Komentarz. Art. 1-366. Warszawa: C.H. Beck, 881-888.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Jacob, J.I.H. (1987). The Fabric of English Civil Justice. London: Stevens & Sons.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Jolowicz, J.A. (2000). On Civil Procedure. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511549540
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Karolczyk, B. (2013), Pretrial as a Part of Judicial Case Management in Poland in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Law Review, 15, 151-188.10.12775/CLR.2013.009
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Kay, M. (2012). (Ed.) Blackstone’s Civil Practice 2013: The Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kiurunen, P. & Lindstr¨om, N. (2012). Norway. In P.G. Karlsgodt (Ed.), World Class Actions: A Guide to Group and Representative Actions around the Globe. New York: Oxford University Press, 229-240.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Kiurunen, P., Lindström, N. & Bylov Rath M. (2012). Denmark. In P.G. Karlsgodt (Ed.), World Class Actions: A Guide to Group and Representative Actions around the Globe. New York: Oxford University Press, 186-197.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Kornai, J. (1995). Highway and Byways: Studies on Reform and Post-communist Transition. Cambridge-London: MIT Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Kryzys wymiaru sprawiedliwości!!!. (2014, October 23). Retrieved from http://temidacontrasm.info/kyzys-wymiaru-sprawiedliwosci/
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Kunicki, I. (2008). Opinia na temat poselskiego projektu ustawy o zmianie ustawy - Kodeks postępowania cywilnego oraz niektorych innych ustaw (druk nr 112). Retrieved from http://orka.sejm.gov.pl/rexdomk6.nsf/0/0ED8F57D4CE900CFC12574CE0037995C/$file/i2467-08.rtf
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Łazarska, A. (2012). Sędziowskie kierownictwo postępowaniem. Przegląd Sądowy, 5, 50-75.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Łętowska, E. (2010). Niedomagająca legitymizacja trzeciej władzy. Dodatek do Monitora Prawniczego, 3, 30-34.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Mańko, R. (2014). European Small Claims Procedure Legal analysis of the Commission’s proposal to remedy weaknesses in the current system. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2014/542137/EPRS_IDA(2014)542137_REV1_EN.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Mańko, R. (2015). Reform of the European Small Claims Procedure: Legislation in progress. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2015/557014/EPRS_BRI(2015)557014_EN.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Ministerstwo Sprawiedliwości (2015a). Sądy Okręgowe - Polska. MS-S1. Sprawozdanie w sprawach cywilnych. Retrieved from https://isws.ms.gov.pl/Data/Files/_public/isws/jednoroczne/2014/spr_zbior_2014/ms-s1o_2014.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Ministerstwo Sprawiedliwości (2015b). Sądy Rejonowe - Polska. MS-S1. Sprawozdanie w sprawach cywilnych. Retrieved from https://isws.ms.gov.pl/Data/Files/_public/isws/jednoroczne/2014/spr_zbior_2014/ms-s1r_2014.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Modéer, K.Å. (2004). Delay and judicial culture in Sweden. In C.H. van Rhee (Ed.), The Law’s Delay: Essays on Undue Delay in Civil Litigation. Antwerpen- Groningen: Intersentia, 195-202.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Murray, P.L. & Stürner, R. (2004). German Civil Justice. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Niemi, J. (2010). Civil Procedure in Finland. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Nylund, A. (2014). European Integration and Nordic Civil Procedure. In L. Ervo, A. Nylund (Eds.), The Future of Civil Litigation: Access to Courts and Court-annexed Mediation in the Nordic Countries. Cham: Springer, 31-51.10.1007/978-3-319-04465-1_3
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Oberhammer, P. & Domej, T. (2010). Delay in Austrian Civil Procedure and the Legislator’s Response. In C.H. van Rhee (Ed.), Within a Reasonable Time. The History of Due and Undue Delay in Civil Litigation. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 57-73.10.2307/j.ctv1q69scv.15
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. O’Reilly, C.A. & Pondy, L.R. (1979). Organizational communication. In S. Kerr (Ed.), Organizational behaviour. Columbus: Grid, 119-150.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Orton, F. (2008). Some Special Features of Swedish Civil Procedure. Acta Juridica Hungarica, 49(3), 311-317.10.1556/AJur.49.2008.3.6
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Petersen, C.S. (2014). A comparative Perspective on Recent Nordic Reforms of Civil Justice. In L. Ervo, A. Nylund (Eds.), The Future of Civil Litigation: Access to Courts and Court-annexed Mediation in the Nordic Countries. Cham: Springer, 9-30.10.1007/978-3-319-04465-1_2
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Piasecki, K. (1989). Przewlekłość sądowego postępowania w sprawach cywilnych - przyczyny i środki zaradcze. Nowe Prawo 4, 29-39.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Regulation (EU) 2015/2421 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 establishing a European Small Claims Procedure and Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 creating a European order for payment procedure (OJ L 341, 24.12.2015).
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. van Rhee, C.H. (2004). (Ed.) The Law’s Delay: Essays on Undue Delay in Civil Litigation. Antwerpen-Groningen: Intersentia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. van Rhee, C.H. (2012). Harmonisation of Civil Procedure: An Historical and Comparative Perspective. In X.E. Kramer, C.H. van Rhee (Eds.), Civil Litigation in a Globalising World. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 39-64.10.1007/978-90-6704-817-0_3
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Robberstad, A. (2012). Sivilprosess. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Smolej, M. & Johnsen, J.T. (2007). Time management of justice systems: a Northern Europe study. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Storskrubb E. (2008). Civil Procedure and EU Law: A Policy Area Uncovered. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199533176.001.0001
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Strus-Wołos, M. (2013). Możliwości składania wnioskow dowodowych przez pełnomocnikow poza pierwszym pismem. In J. Giezek, A. Malicki (Eds.), Adwokatura a modele procedur sądowych. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 189-196.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Sunnqvist,M. (2012). Loser Pays - But Only a Reasonable Amount. InM. Reimann (Ed.), Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure: A Comparative Study. Dordrecht-Heidelberg-London-New York: Springer, 267-274.10.1007/978-94-007-2263-7_24
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. The 2015 EU Justice Scoreboard (2015). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/justice/effective-justice/files/justice_scoreboard_2015_en.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. The truth about civil cases (2015, October 9). Retrieved from http://open.justice.gov.uk/courts/civil-cases/
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. Tokarczyk, R. (2008). Komparatystyka prawnicza. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. Ustawa z 17 listopada 1964 r. - Kodeks postępowania cywilnego, tekst jedn. Dz.U. z 2014 r., poz. 101, z poźn. zm.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. Uzelac, A. (2010). Survival of the Third Legal Tradition? Supreme Court Law Review 49, 377-396.
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. Uzelac, A. (2014a). Delays and Backlogs in Civil Procedure. A (South East) European Perspective. Revista De Processo 238, 39-64.
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. Uzelac, A. (2014b). (Ed.) Goals of Civil Justice and Civil Procedure in Contemporary Judicial Systems. Cham: Springer International Publishing Switzerland.10.1007/978-3-319-03443-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. Uzelac, A. (2014c). Goals of Civil Justice and Civil Procedure in Contemporary World. In A. Uzelac (Ed.), Goals of Civil Justice and Civil Procedure in Contemporary Judicial Systems. Cham: Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 3-34.10.1007/978-3-319-03443-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. Werlauff, E. (2010). Civil Procedure in Denmark. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. Wojciechowski, B. (2010). Discourse Ethics as a Basis of the Application of Law. In J. Jemielniak, P. Mikłaszewicz (Eds.), Interpretation of Law in the Global World: From Particularism to a Universal Approach. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 53-70.10.1007/978-3-642-04886-9_3
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. Zieliński, A. (2014). Art. 207. In A. Zieliński (Ed.), Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz. Warszawa: C.H. Beck, 434-436.
    Search in Google Scholar
  64. Żyznowski, T. (2013). Art. 207. In H. Dolecki, T. Wiśniewski (Eds.), Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Tom I. Artykuły 1-366. Warszawa:Wolters Kluwer, 780-787.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2016-0025 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 199 - 223
Published on: Jul 14, 2016
Published by: University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
civil cases,
preparatory proceedings,
preliminary stage,
pre-trial stage,
pleadings,
written form,
oral form
Related subjects:
Philosophy,
Philosophy, other

© 2016 Anna Piszcz, published by University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 45 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)Next article