Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Theological Underpinnings of the Modern Philosophy of Mathematics. Cover

Theological Underpinnings of the Modern Philosophy of Mathematics.

Open Access
|Mar 2016

References

  1. Bell, E.T. (1945).(2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  2. Benacerraf, P., & Putnam, H. (Eds.). (1983).(2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Bergmans, L. (2005). Gerrit Mannoury and his fellow significians on mathematics and mysticism. In T. Koetsier & L. Bergmans (Eds.),(pp. 549–568). Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.
  4. Bishop, E. (1967).. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  5. Brouwer, L.E.J. (1975).(A. Heyting, Ed.). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
  6. Brouwer, L.E.J. (1996). Life, art, and mysticism (W.P. van Stigt, Intr. and trans.).,, 381–429. (Original work published 1905)
  7. Cellucci, C. (2005). Mathematical discourse vs. mathematical intuition. In C. Cellucci & D. Gillies (Eds.),(pp. 137–165). London: King’s College Publications.
  8. Cohen, D.J. (2007).Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  9. Davis, P.J. (2004). A brief look at mathematics and theology.,. Retrieved from
  10. Ewald, W.B. (1996).. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  11. Ferreirós, J. (2004). The motives behind Cantor’s set theory – physical, biological, and philosophical questions., 49–83.
  12. Frege, G. (1980).(G. Gabriel et al., Eds., B. McGuinness, Abr., H. Kaal, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
  13. Gray, J.J. (2004). Anxiety and abstraction in nineteenth-century mathematics.,, 23–47.
  14. Gray, J.J. (2008).. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  15. Heijerman, E. (1990). Relativism and significs: Gerrit Mannoury on the foundations of mathematics. In H.W. Schmitz (Ed.),(pp. 247–272). John Benjamins B.V.
  16. Hesseling, D.E. (2003).. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser Verlag.
  17. Heyerman, E. (1981)..Utrecht: Utrecht University, Department of Mathematics.
  18. Hilbert, D. (1900). Mathematische Probleme. In(pp. 253–297). Göttingen: Dieterichsche Universitätsbuchhandlung.
  19. Hilbert, D. (1926). Über das Unendliche.,, 161–190. English translation (van Heijenoort, 1967, pp. 367–392).
  20. Hilbert, D. (1928). Die Grundlagen der Mathematik.,, 65–85. English translation (van Heijenoort, 1967, pp. 464–479).
  21. Hilbert, D. (1930). Naturerkennen und Logik., 959–963. English translation (Ewald, 1996, pp. 1157–1165).
  22. Hilbert, D. (2013).(W. Ewald & W. Sieg, Eds.). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
  23. Kleene, S.C. (1952).. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  24. Klein, F. (1909).. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.
  25. Koetsier, T. (2005). Arthur Schopenhauer and L.E.J. Brouwer: A comparison. In T. Koetsier & L. Bergmans (Eds.),(pp. 569–593). Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.
  26. Kragh, H. (2014). The true (?) story of Hilbert’s infinite hotel. Retrieved from
  27. Kunen, K. (2009).. London, UK: College Publications.
  28. Lakatos, I. (1976).(J. Worrall & E. Zahar, Eds.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  29. McLarty, C. (2012). Hilbert on theology and its discontents. In A. Doxiadis & B. Mazur (Eds.),(pp. 105–129). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  30. Minkowski, H. (1905). Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet und seine Bedeutung für die heutige Mathematik.,, 149–163.
  31. Mendelson, E. (1979).(2nd ed.). New York, NY: D. Van Nostrand Company. (First edition 1964)
  32. Plato (1997).(J.M. Cooper, Ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
  33. Rasiowa, H. & Sikorski, R. (1963).. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
  34. Reid, C. (1970).Berlin – Heidelberg: Springer.
  35. Russell, B. (1917).. London: Allen & Unwin.
  36. Russell, B. (1919).. London, UK: Allen & Unwin, New York, NY: The MacMillan Co.
  37. Russell, B. (1956).New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
  38. Russell, B. (1959).New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
  39. van Atten, M. & Tragesser, R. (2003). Mysticism and mathematics: Brouwer, Gödel, and the common core thesis. In W. Deppert & M. Rahnfeld (Eds.),(pp. 145–160). Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag. Reprinted in (van Atten, 2015, pp. 173–187).
  40. van Atten, M. (2015).. Cham: Springer.
  41. van Dalen, D. (2008). Another look at Brouwer’s dissertation. In M. van Atten et al. (Eds.),(pp. 3–20) Berlin: Birkhäuser.
  42. van Dalen, D. (2011).London, UK: Springer-Verlag.
  43. van Dalen, D. (2013).London, UK: Springer-Verlag.
  44. van Heijenoort, J. (1967).Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  45. van Stigt, W.P. (1979). The rejected parts of Brouwer’s dissertation on the foundations of mathematics.,, 385–404. The rejected parts reprinted in (van Stigt, 1990, pp. 405–415).
  46. van Stigt, W.P. (1990).. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
  47. Weyl, H. (1921). Über die neue Grundlagenkrise der Mathematik.,, 39–79.
  48. Weyl, H. (1946). Mathematics and logic.,, 2–13.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2016-0009 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 (formerly 0860-150X) | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 147 - 168
Published on: Mar 17, 2016
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:

© 2016 Vladislav Shaposhnikov, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.