Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Theological Underpinnings of the Modern Philosophy of Mathematics. Cover

Theological Underpinnings of the Modern Philosophy of Mathematics.

Open Access
|Mar 2016

References

  1. Albertson, D. (2014).. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  2. Beck, L.W. (1991). Foreword. In K.C. Köhnke,(pp. ix–xiii). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Bloor, D. (1991).(2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (First published 1976).
  4. Bolzano, B. (1973).(J. Berg, Ed., B. Terrell, Trans.). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company. (Original work published 1837)
  5. Boniface, J. (2005). Leopold Kronecker’s conception of the foundations of mathematics.,, 143–156. Retrieved from.
  6. Breger, H. (2005). God and mathematics in Leibniz’s thought (pp. 485–498). In T. Koetsier & L. Bergmans (Eds.),. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.
  7. Bueno, O., & Vickers, P. (Eds.). (2014). Is Science Inconsistent?, 2887–3158 (A special issue).
  8. Byers, W. (2007).. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  9. Cantor, G. (1932). Über unendliche lineare Punktmannigfaltigkeiten, Nr. 5: Grundlagen einer allgemeinen Mannigfaltigkeitslehre. In G. Cantor,(E. Zermelo, Ed.) (pp. 165–209). Berlin: Springer. Original work published 1883. English translation (Ewald, 1996, pp. 878–920).
  10. Colyvan, M. (2008). Who’s afraid of inconsistent mathematics?, 24–35.
  11. Colyvan, M. (2009). Applying inconsistent mathematics. In O. Bueno & Ø. Linnebo (Eds.),(pp. 160–172). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
  12. Comte, A. (1934)..(6 éd.). Paris: Alfred Costes. (Original work published 1830)
  13. Comte, A. (1851).:Cours de philosophie positive. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers. (Original work published 1830)
  14. Dedekind, R. (1893).2. Auflage. Braunschweig: Vieweg. First published 1888. English translation under the name “The nature and meaning of numbers” (Dedekind, 1901, pp. 29–115).
  15. Dedekind, R. (1901).. Chicago: Open Court.
  16. Dedekind, R. (1932).,. (Band 3). Braunschweig: Vieweg.
  17. Descartes, R. (1985).(J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
  18. Descartes, R. (1991).(J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, D. Murdoch, & A. Kenny, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
  19. Detlefsen, M. (1998). Constructive existence claims. In M. Schirn (Ed.),(pp. 307–336). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  20. Diderot, D. (1995). Detailed explanation of the system of human knowledge. In J. le R. d’Alembert,(R.N. Schwab, Trans., with the collaboration of W.E. Rex) (pp. 143–157). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1751)
  21. Eldridge, M. (2004). Naturalism. In A.T. Marsoobian & J. Ryder (Eds.),(pp. 52–72). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
  22. Ernest, P. (1991).London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
  23. Ernest, P. (1998).. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  24. Ewald, W.B. (1996).. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  25. Ferreirós, J. (2007a).(2nd rev. ed.). Berlin: Birkhäuser. (First published 1999)
  26. Ferreirós, J. (2007b). ʹΟ Θεὸς ʹΑριϑμετίζει: The rise of pure mathematics as arithmetic with Gauss. In C. Goldstein, N. Schappacher, & J. Schwermer (Eds.),Disquisitiones Arithmeticae (pp. 234–268). Berlin: Springer.
  27. Ferreirós, J. (2008). The crisis in the foundations of mathematics. In T. Gowers (Ed.),(pp. 142–156), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  28. Frege, G. (1979).(H. Hermes et al., Eds., P. Long & R. White, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
  29. Frege, G. (1984).(B. McGuinness, Ed.). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
  30. Frege, G. (1996). Diary: Written by Professor Dr Gottlob Frege in the time from 10 March to 9 May 1924 (G. Gabriel & W. Kienzler, Ed. and comm., R.L. Mendelsohn, Trans.).,, 303–342.
  31. Galilei, G. (1967).(2nd rev. ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  32. Gersh, S.E. (1978).Leiden: E.J. Brill.
  33. Gersh, S.E. (1996).. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  34. Giaquinto, M. (2002).. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  35. Heidegger, M. (2002). Nietzsche’s word: “God is dead”. In M. Heidegger,(J. Young & K. Haynes, Eds. and trans.) (pp. 157–199). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work written 1943 and published 1950)
  36. Hilbert, D. (1902). Mathematical problems (Lecture delivered before the International Congress of Mathematicians at Paris in 1900).,, 437–479 (Original work published 1900)
  37. Hilbert, D. (1926). Über das Unendliche.,, 161–190. English translation (van Heijenoort, 1967, pp. 367–392).
  38. Hilbert, D. (1992).–(D.E. Rowe, Ed.). Basel: Birkhäuser.
  39. Huttinga, W. (2014). “Marie Antoinette” or mystical depth?: Herman Bavinck on theology as queen of the sciences. In J. Eglinton & G. Harinck (Eds.),(pp. 143–154). London, UK: Bloomsbury T&T Clark.
  40. Kanigel, R. (1991).. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
  41. Kant, I. (1998).(P. Guyer & A.W. Wood, Trans. and ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1781/1787)
  42. Kepler, J. (1997).Philadelphia, PA: American Philosophical Society. (Original work published 1619)
  43. Kline, M. (1980).. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  44. Kovač, S. (2008). Gödel, Kant, and the path of a science.,, 147–169.
  45. Lakatos, I. (1976).(J. Worrall & E. Zahar, Eds.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  46. Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R.E. (2000).. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  47. Leibniz, G.W. (1989).(R. Ariew & D. Garber, Eds. and trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
  48. Lorenz, K. (1941). Kants Lehre vom Apriorischen im Lichte gegenwärtiger Biologie., 94–125. English translation (Lorenz, 2009).
  49. Lorenz, K. (2009). Kant’s doctrine of thein the light of contemporary biology. In M. Ruse (Ed.),(pp. 231–247). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  50. Lossky, V. (2012).. Paris: Cerf.
  51. Mancosu, P. (1998).. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  52. Map of the system of human knowledge. In D. Goodman et al. (Project directors)University of Michigan. Retrieved from(Original work published 1751)
  53. Martineau, H. (1896).,. London: George Bell & Sons.
  54. Menzel, C. (2001). God and mathematical Objects. In R.W. Howell &W.J. Bradley (Eds.),(pp. 65–97). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
  55. Mill, J.S. (1974).–(J.M. Robson, Ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. (Original work published 1843)
  56. Molière (18??). Don Juan. In,(Vol. 3, pp. 69–133). Philadelphia: George Barrie.
  57. Mortensen, C. (2013). Inconsistent mathematics. In E.N. Zalta (Ed.),. Retrieved from(First published 1996, substantive revision 2013)
  58. O’Meara, D.J. (1989).. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  59. Pascal, B. (1654). Le Mémorial. In. Retrieved from
  60. Posy, C.J. (1998). Brouwer versus Hilbert: 1907–1928.,, 291–325.
  61. Pyenson, L. (1982). Relativity in Late Wilhelmian Germany: The appeal to a preestablished harmony between mathematics and physics.,, 137–155.
  62. Quine, W.V. (1981). Success and limits of mathematization. In W.V. Quine,(pp. 148–155). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  63. Schaeffer, J.-M. (2007).. Paris: Gallimard.
  64. Scott, C.A. (1900). The International Congress of Mathematicians in Paris.,, 57–79.
  65. Sepkoski, D. (2007).. New York, NY: Routledge.
  66. Seshu Aiyar, P.V. & Ramachandra Rao, R. (1927). Srinivasa Ramanujan (1887–1920). In S. Ramanujan,(G.H. Hardy, P.V. Seshu Aiyar, & B.M. Wilson, Eds.) (pp. xi–xix). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  67. Shaposhnikov, V.A. (2009). Kategoriya chisla v konkretnoj metafizike Pavla Florenskogo [Number as a category in Pavel Florensky’s concrete metaphysics]. In A.N. Krichevets (Ed.),(pp. 341–367). Moscow: MAX Press. [In Russian]
  68. Shaposhnikov, V.A. (2014). The applicability problem and a naturalistic perspective on mathematics. In G. Mints & O. Prosorov (Eds.), Philosophy, mathematics, linguistics: Aspects of interaction. Proceedings of the international scientific conference: St. Petersburg, April 21–25, 2014 (pp. 185–197). Saint Petersburg: Euler International Mathematical Institute.
  69. Slaveva-Griffin, S. (2014). Number in the metaphysical landscape. In P. Remes & S. Slaveva-Griffin (Eds.),(pp. 200–215). New York, NY: Routledge.
  70. Sortorius von Waltershausen, W. (1856)., Leipzig: S. Hirzel. Système figuré des connaissances humaines. (1751). In(R. Morrissey & G. Roe, Eds.). University of Chicago. Retrieved from
  71. Tapp, C. (2011). Infinity in mathematics and theology.,, 91–100.
  72. van Heijenoort, J. (1967).–Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  73. Vizgin, V.P. (1998). Einstein’s “cosmic religion” and Wigner’s “empirical law of epistemology”. In I.V. Filimonova & V.A. Petrov (Eds.),–(pp. 90–96). Protvino: Institute for High Energy Physics. Retrieved from
  74. Weber, H. (1893). Leopold Kronecker.,, 1–25.
  75. Weber, Z. (2009). Inconsistent mathematics. In J. Fieser & B. Dowden (Eds.),. Retrieved from
  76. Weyl, H. (1921). Über die neue Grundlagenkrise der Mathematik.,, 39–79. English translation (Mancosu, 1998, pp. 86–118).
  77. White, L.A. (1947). The locus of mathematical reality: An anthropological footnote., 289–303.
  78. Wigner, E. (1960). The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences.,, 1–14.
  79. Wilder, R.L. (1981).. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
  80. Wilholt, T. (2006). Lost on the way from Frege to Carnap: How the philosophy of science forgot the applicability problem.,, 69–82.
  81. Zakai, A. (2007). The rise of modern science and the decline of theology as the “queen of sciences” in the early modern era.,, 125–151. Reprinted in (Zakai, 2010, pp. 51–85).
  82. Zakai, A. (2010).London, UK: Continuum T&T Clark.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2016-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 (formerly 0860-150X) | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 31 - 54
Published on: Mar 17, 2016
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:

© 2016 Vladislav Shaposhnikov, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.