REC: Just Radical Enough

Myin, Erik; Hutto, Daniel D.

doi:10.1515/slgr-2015-0020

Abstract

We address some frequently encountered criticisms of Radical Embodied/Enactive Cognition. Contrary to the claims that the position is too radical, or not sufficiently so, we claim REC is just radical enough.

References

Brewer, B. (2011). Perception and its objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199260256.001.0001
Search in Google Scholar
Campbell, D. (2014). Review of the book Radicalizing Enactivism by D. D. Hutto and E. Myin. Analysis, 74(1), 174–176.
Search in Google Scholar
Colombo, M. (2014a). Explaining social norm compliance: A plea for neural representations. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 13(2), 217–238.10.1007/s11097-013-9296-0
Search in Google Scholar
Colombo, M. (2014b). Neural representationalism, the Hard Problem of Content and vitiated verdicts: A reply to Hutto & Myin (2013). Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 13(2), 257–274.10.1007/s11097-014-9350-6
Search in Google Scholar
Degenaar, J., & Myin, E. (2014). Representation-hunger reconsidered. Synthese, 191, 3639–3648.10.1007/s11229-014-0484-4
Search in Google Scholar
Evans, G. (1982). The varieties of reference. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Gladziejewski, P. (2015). Explaining cognitive phenomena with internal representations: A mechanistic perspective. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 40(53), 63–90.10.1515/slgr-2015-0004
Search in Google Scholar
Grush, R. (1997). The architecture of representation. Philosophical Psychology, 10, 5–23.10.1080/09515089708573201
Search in Google Scholar
Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation: motor control, imagery and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 377–442.10.1017/S0140525X04000093
Search in Google Scholar
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Hutto, D. D. (2008). Folk psychological narratives: The sociocultural basis of understanding reasons. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Hutto, D. D., & Satne, G. (in press). The natural origins of content. Philosophia.
Search in Google Scholar
McGinn, C. (1989). Mental content. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Search in Google Scholar
Myin, E., & Degenaar, J. (2014). Enactive vision. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 90–98). London: Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar
Ramsey W. M. (2007). Representation reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511597954
Search in Google Scholar
Roberts, T. (2013). Review of the book Radicalizing Enactivism by D. D. Hutto and E. Myin. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. An Electronic Journal, 2013.05.16. http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/40035-radicalizing-enactivism-basic-minds-without-content/
Search in Google Scholar
Shapiro, L. (2014). Review of the book Radicalizing Enactivism by D. D. Hutto and E. Myin. Mind, 123(489), 213–220.10.1093/mind/fzu033
Search in Google Scholar
Travis, Ch. (2014). Perception: Essays after Frege. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar
van den Herik, J., (2014). Why Radical Enactivism is not radical enough: A case for really Radical Enactivism [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. University of Rotterdam, Faculty of Philosophy.
Search in Google Scholar

REC: Just Radical Enough

Abstract

Paradigm

My account