Have a personal or library account? Click to login
On Language Adequacy Cover

On Language Adequacy

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
Volume 40 (2015): Issue 1 (March 2015)
By:
Open Access
|Apr 2015

References

  1. Ajdukiewicz, K. (1931). O znaczeniu wyrażeń [On the meaning of expressions]. Księga pamiątkowa Polskiego Towarzystwa Filozoficznego we Lwowie. Reprinted in Ajdukiewicz (1960a).
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Ajdukiewicz, K. (1934). Sprache und Sinn. Erkenntnis, 4, 100-138.10.1007/BF01793486
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Ajdukiewicz, K. (1935). Die syntaktische Konnexität. Studia Philosophica, 1, Leopoli.1-27. English translation: Syntactic connection. In S. McCall (Ed.), Polish logic 1920-1939 (pp. 202-231). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Ajdukiewicz, K. (1960). Związki składniowe między członami zdań oznajmujących [Syntactical relations between constituents of declarative sentences]. Studia Filozoficzne, 6(21), 73-86. First presented in English at the International Linguistic Symposium in Erfurt, September 27 - October 2, 1958.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Ajdukiewicz, K. (1960a). Język i poznanie [Language and cognition], vol. 1. Warszawa: PWN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Bar-Hillel, Y.(1950). On Syntactical Categories. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 15, 1-16. Reprinted in Bar-Hillel (1964), pp. 19-37.10.2307/2268436
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Bar-Hillel, Y. (1953). A Quasi-arithmetical notation for syntactic description. Language, 29, 47-58. Reprinted in Bar-Hillel (1964), pp. 61-74.10.2307/410452
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Bar-Hillel, Y. (1964). Language and information: Selected essays on their theory and applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. van Benthem, J. (1980). Universal algebra and model theory: Two excursions on the border. Report ZW-7908. Groningen: Department of Mathematics of Groningen University.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. van Benthem, J. (1981). Why is semantics what? In J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Formal methods in the study of language (pp. 29-49). Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre Tract 135.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. van Benthem, J. (1984). The logic of semantics. In F. Landman & F. Veltman (Eds.), Varietes of formal semantics, GRASS series, vol. 3 (pp. 55-80). Dordrecht: Foris.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. van Benthem, J. (1986). Essays in logical semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-4540-1
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Bocheński, J. M. (1949). On the syntactical categories. New Scholasticism, 23, 257-280.10.5840/newscholas194923347
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Buszkowski, W. (1988). Three theories of categorial grammar. In W. Buszkowski, W. Marciszewski & J. van Benthem (Eds.), pp. 57-84.10.1075/llsee.25.07bus
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Buszkowski, W. (1989). Logiczne podstawy gramatyk kategorialnych Ajdukiewicza- Lambeka [Logical foundations of Ajdukiewicz’s-Lambek’s categorial grammar). Series Logika i jej zastosowania [Logic and its applications].Warszawa: PWN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Buszkowski, W. (1994), O klasycznej gramatyce kategorialnej [On classical categorial grammar]. In J. Pelc (Ed.), Znaczenie i prawda: Rozprawy semiotyczne [Meaning and truth: Semiotic papers] (pp. 203-220). Warszawa: PWN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Buszkowski,W. (2003). Type logics in grammar. In V. F. Hendrics & J. Malinowski (Eds.), Trends in logic: 50 years of Studia Logica (pp. 321-366). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Buszkowski, W., Marciszewski, W., & van Benthem, J. (Eds.) (1988). Categorial grammar, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamis Publishing Company.10.1075/llsee.25
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Carnap, R. (1942). Introduction to semantics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Carnap, R. (1947). Meaning and necessity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Cresswell, M. J. (1973). Logics and languages. London: Mathuen and Co. Ltd.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Cresswell, M. J. (1977). Categorial languages. Studia Logica, 36, 257-269.10.1007/BF02120664
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Curry, H. B. (1961). Some aspects of grammatical structure. In R. Jakobson (Ed.), Structure of language and its mathematical aspects, vol. 12 (pp. 57-68). Providence, RI: AMS.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Curry, H. B. (1963). Foundations of mathematical logic. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Duži, M., Jaspersen, B., & Materna, P. (2010). Procedural semantics for hyperintensional logic. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-8812-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Frege, G. (1879). Begriffsschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachbildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens, Halle. Reprinted in Frege (1964).
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Frege, G. (1892). Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik, 100, 25-50. English translation in H. Feigel & W. Sellars (Eds.) (1949), Readings in philosophical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, and in B. Beaney (Ed.) (1997), The Frege reader (pp. 151-171). Oxford: Blackwell.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Frege, G. (1964). Begriffsschrift und andere Ausätze (I. Angelelli (Ed.)). Darmstadt- Hildesheim: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft/G. Olms.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Gamut, L. T. F. (1991). (J. van Benthem, J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh,M. Stokhoft and H. Vercuyl) Logic, language and meaning, vol. 1: Introduction to logic, vol. II: Intensional logic and logical grammar. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Hiż, H. (1960). The intuitions of grammatical categories. Methodos, 12(48), 1-9.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Hiż, H. (1961). Congrammaticality: Batteries of transformations and grammatical categories. In R. Jakobson (Ed.), Structure of language and its mathematical aspects, vol. 12 (pp. 43-50). Providence, RI: AMS.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Hiż, H. (1967). Grammar logicism. The Monist, 51, 110-127. Reprinted in W. Buszkowski, W. Marciszewski & J. van Benthem (Eds.) (1988). Categorial grammar (pp. 263-282). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamis Publishing Company.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Hodges,W. (1996). Compositional semantics for language of imperfect information. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 5(4), 539-563.10.1093/jigpal/5.4.539
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Hodges, W. (1998). Compositionality is not the problem. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 6, 7-33.10.12775/LLP.1998.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Hodges,W. (2001). Formal features of compositionality. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 10, 7-28.10.1023/A:1026502210492
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Husserl, E. (1900-1901). Logische Untersuchungen, vol. 1, Halle 1900, vol. 2, Halle Janssen, T. M. V. (1996). Compositionality. In J. van Benthem & A. ter Muelen (Eds.) Handbook of logic and language (pp. 417-473).Amsterdam - Lausanne - New York: Elsevier Science.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Janssen, T. M. V. (2001). Frege, contextuality and compositionality. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 10, 115-136.10.1023/A:1026542332224
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Kracht, M. (2011). Interpreted languages and compositionality. Dordrecht - Heildeberg - London - New York: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-2108-1
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Lambek, J. (1958). The mathematics of sentence structure. American Mathematical Monthly, 65, 154-170.10.1080/00029890.1958.11989160
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Lambek, J. (1961). On the calculus of syntactic types. In R. Jakobson (Ed.). Structure of language and its mathematical aspects: Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, vol. 12 (pp. 166-178). Providence, RI: AMS.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Leśniewski, S. (1929). Grundzüge eines neuen Systems der Grundlagen der Mathematik. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 14, 1-81.10.4064/fm-14-1-1-81
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Leśniewski, S. (1930). Über die Grundlagen der Ontologie. Compte rendus des séances dela Société des Sciences et des Lettres de Varsovie, Classe II, 23, 111-132.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Maciaszek, J. (2008). Znaczenie. Prawda. Przekonania: Problematyka znaczenia w filozofii języka [Meaning. Truth. Beliefs: Issues of meaning in the philosophy of language]. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Marciszewski, W. (1988). A chronicle of categorial grammar. In W. Buszkowski et al. (Eds.), pp. 7-22.10.1075/llsee.25.03mar
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Montague, R. (1970). Universal grammar. Theoria, 36, 373-398.10.1111/j.1755-2567.1970.tb00434.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Montague, R. (1974). Formal philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague (Ed. and introd. R. H. Thomason). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Olech, A. (2001). Ajdukiewicz a Husserl wobec kwestii znaczenia wyrażeń [Ajdukiewicz and Husserl on the issue of meaning of expressions]. Studia Semiotyczne, 24, 141-161.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Peirce, S. Ch. (1931-1935). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.)), vols. 1-5. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Pelc, J. (1971). Studies in functional logical semiotics of natural languages, Janua Linguarum Series Minor 90, The Hague - Paris: Mouton.10.1515/9783110828375
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Pelc, J. (1979). A functional approach to the logical semiotics of natural language. In Semiotics in Poland 1894-1969 (selected and edited with an introduction by Jerzy Pelc). Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic and Methodology of Science, vol. 119 (pp. 342-375). Dordrecht - Boston: PWN - Reidel.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Partee, B. H. (1984). Compositionality. In F. Landman & F. Veltman (Eds.), Varieties of formal semantics: Proceedings of the fourth Amsterdam Colloqium (pp. 281-311). Dordrecht: Foris.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Pelletier, F. J. (2001). Did Frege believe Frege’s principle? Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 10, 87-114.10.1023/A:1026594023292
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. Simons, P. (1989). Combinators and categorial grammar. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 30(2), 241-261.10.1305/ndjfl/1093635081
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Simons, P. (2006). Languages with variable-binding operators: Categorial syntax and combinatorial semantics. In J. Jadacki & J. Paśniczek (Eds.), The Lvov-Warsaw School - the new generation. Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of Sciences and Humanities, vol. 89 (pp. 239-268). Amsterdam - New York: Rodopi.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. Stanosz, B., & Nowaczyk, A. (1976). Logiczne podstawy języka [The logical foundations of language]. Wrocław - Warszawa: Ossolineum.
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. Suszko, R. (1958). Syntactic structure and semantical reference, Part I. Studia Logica, 8, 213-144.10.1007/BF02126751
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. Suszko, R. (1960). Syntactic structure and semantical reference, Part II. Studia Logica, 9, 63-93.10.1007/BF02548469
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. Suszko, R. (1964). O kategoriach syntaktycznych i denotacjach wyrażeń w językach sformalizowanych [On the syntactic categories and the denotation of expressions in formalized languages]. In Rozprawy logiczne [Logical papers] (pp. 193-204). Warszawa: PWN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. Suszko, R. (1968). Ontology in the Tractatus of L. Wittgenstein. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 9, 7-33.10.1305/ndjfl/1093893349
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. Tałasiewicz M. (2010). Philosophy of Syntax: Foundational Topics. Dordrecht - Heildeberg - London - New York: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-3288-1
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. Tesniére, L. (1959) Élements de syntaxe structural. Paris: Klincksieck; 2nd edition (1969), Paris: Klincksieck. Wittgenstein, L. (1953) Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. Wójcicki, R. (1999) Ajdukiewicz: Teoria znaczenia [Ajdukiewicz: The theory of meaning]. Warszawa: Prószyński i S-ka.
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. Wybraniec-Skardowska, U. (1985) Teoria języków syntaktycznie kategorialnych [The theory of syntactically categorial languages]. Wrocław - Warszawa: PWN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  64. Wybraniec-Skardowska, U. (1989). On eliminatibility of ideal linguistic entities. Studia Logica, 48(4), 587-615.10.1007/BF00370210
    Search in Google Scholar
  65. Wybraniec-Skardowska, U. (1991). Theory of language syntax: Categorial approach. Dordrecht -Boston - London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-0-585-26680-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  66. Wybraniec-Skardowska, U. (1998). Logical and philosophical ideas in certain approaches to language. Synthese, 116(2), 231-277.10.1023/A:1005098325137
    Search in Google Scholar
  67. Wybraniec-Skardowska, U. (2001a). On denotations of quantifiers. In M. Omyła (Ed.), Logical ideas of Roman Suszko (pp. 89-119). Warsaw: Faculty of Philosophy and Sociology of Warsaw University.
    Search in Google Scholar
  68. Wybraniec-Skardowska, U. (2001b). Three principles of compositionality. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 7(1), 157-158.
    Search in Google Scholar
  69. Wybraniec-Skardowska, U. (2005a). Meaning and interpretation. In J. Y. Beziau & A. Costa Leite (Eds.), Handbook of the First World Congress and School on Universal Logic (p. 104). Unilog’05, Montreux, Switzerland.
    Search in Google Scholar
  70. Wybraniec-Skardowska, U. (2005b). O pojęciach sensu z perspektywy logiki [On the notions of sense from the perspective of logic]. In K. Trzęsicki (Ed.), Ratione et Studio (pp. 155-190). Białystok: Publishing House of Białystok University. Wybraniec-Skardowska, U. (2006). On the formalization of classical categorial grammar. In J. Jadacki & J. Paśniczek (Eds.), The Lvov-Warsaw School - the new generation. Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of Sciences and Humanities, vol. 89 (pp. 269-288). Amsterdam - New York: Rodopi.
    Search in Google Scholar
  71. Wybraniec-Skardowska, U. (2007a). Meaning and interpretation, Part I. Studia Logica, 85, 105-132.10.1007/s11225-007-9026-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  72. Wybraniec-Skardowska, U. (2007b). Meaning and interpretation, Part II. Studia Logica, 85, 263-276.10.1007/s11225-007-9031-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  73. Wybraniec-Skardowska, U. (2007c). Three levels of knowledge. In M. Baaz & N. Preining (Eds.), G¨odel Centenary 2006: Posters, Collegium Logicum, vol. 9 (pp. 87-91). Vienna: Kurt G¨odel Society.
    Search in Google Scholar
  74. Wybraniec-Skardowska, U. (2009). On metaknowledge and truth. In D. Makinson, J. Malinowski & H. Wanshing (Eds.), Trends in logic: Towards mathematical philosophy (pp. 319-343). Berlin - Heidelberg: Springer.
    Search in Google Scholar
  75. Wybraniec-Skardowska, U. (2010). Three principles of compositionality. In U. M. Żegleń (Ed.), Cognitive science and media in education: From formal and cognitive aspects of language to knowledge (pp. 28-65). Toruń: Publishing House Adam Marszałek.
    Search in Google Scholar
  76. Wybraniec-Skardowska, U., & Rogalski, A. K. (1999). On universal grammar and its formalisation. Proceedings of 20th World Congress of Philosophy, Boston 1998.
    Search in Google Scholar
  77. Wybraniec-Skardowska, U., & Waldmajer, J. (2009). On language communication from a logical point of view. In E. Tarasti, P. Forsell & R. Littlesield (Eds.), Communication: Understanding/Misunderstanding, vol. 3. Proceedings of the 9th Congress of the IASS/AIS - Helsinki-Imatra: 11-17 June, 2007, Acta Semiotica Fennica XXXIV (pp. 1923-1937). Imatra - Helsinki: The International Semiotics Institute. 292
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2015-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 257 - 292
Published on: Apr 10, 2015
Published by: University of Bialystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
token-type distinction,
categorial grammar,
intensional semantics,
meaning,
interpretation,
constituent of knowledge,
extensional semantics,
referring,
ontological object,
denotation,
categorization,
compatibility of syntax and semantics,
algebraic models,
truth,
compositionality,
communication
Related subjects:
Philosophy,
Philosophy, other

© 2015 Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska, published by University of Bialystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 40 (2015): Issue 1 (March 2015)Next article