References
- 1. Christensen, D. Epistemic Modesty Defended, The Epistemology of Disagreement New Essays, 2013, pp. 76-97.
- 2. Elga, A. Reflection and Disagreement, Nous, 41 (3), 2007, pp. 478-502.
- 3. Enoch, D. Not Just a Truthometer: Taking Oneself Seriously (but Not Too Seriously) in Cases of Peer Disagreement, Mind, 119 (476), 2010, pp. 953-97.
- 4. Halberstam, J. With All Due Epistemic Humility, Presentation, Athens Institute for Education and Research, Annual International Conference on Philosophy, 2016. Athens, Greece.
- 5. Halbertal, M. The History of Halakhah, Views from Within: Three Medieval Approaches to Tradition and Controversy’, http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/Gruss/halbert.html
- 6. Hidary, R. Dispute for the Sake of Heaven: Legal Pluralism in the Talmud, Providence, Brown Judaic Studies-2010.
- 7. Kramer, D. The Mind of the Talmud: An Intellectual History of the Babylonian Talmud, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1990.
- 8. Rosensweig, R. M. Elu V'elu Divrei Elokim Hayyim: Halakhic Pluralism and Theories of Controversies, Tradition, 26/3, 1992), pp. 4-23.
- 9. Sagi, A. Both are the Words of the Living God, HUCA LXV, 1994, pp. 105-136.
- 10. Sokol, M. (ed.) Rabbinic Authority and Personal Autonomy, Northvale, New Jersey: Rowman and Littlefield, 1992.
- 11. Sosa, E. The Epistemology of Disagreement, In A. Haddock, A. Millar, and D. Pritchard, Social Epistemology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, pp.278-297.
- 12. Zion, N. Elu V’Elu: Two Schools of Halakha Face off on Issues of Human Autonomy, Majority Rule and Divine Voice of Authority, Jerusalem, Shalom Hartman Institute, 2008.