References
- Merrllis, J.G. (1993): The development of the international law by the European Court for Human Rights, Menchester, New York, стр.193,
- Wasek – Wiaderek (2000): The Principle of “equality of Arms” in Criminal Procedure Under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Its Functions in Criminal Justice of Selected European Countries: A Comparative View Leuven University press, стр.23
- Публикација: Европска Конвенција за човековите права и слободи, согласно Протоколите број 11 и 14 и со протоколите број 1, 4, 6, 7,12 и 13, Европскиот Суд За Човекови Права, Council of Europe F-67075 Strasbourg cedex, www.echr.coe.int;
- J Summers (2007): Fair Trials The European Criminal Procedural Tradition and the European Court of Human Rights, Hart Publishing, 16C Worcester Place, стр.98
- Guide On Article 6 Right To A Fair Trial, (criminal limb), Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights, 2014, available for downloading at www.echr.coe.int (Case-Law-Case-Law Analysis – Case-Law Guides).
- Мицковски, Н. (2014): Технички советници, ново решение или козметичка измена на вештачењето во македонскиот ЗКП, Зборник на трудови од Првата меѓународна научна конференција – Општествените промени во глобалниот свет, УГД, Штип, стр.17-31;
- Maria Igorevna Fedorova (2012): The Principle of Equality of Arms in International Criminal proceedings, School of Human Rights Research Series, Volume 55
- Anne Richardson Oakes. 2012. “Problems of Perception in the European Court of Human Rights: A Matter of Evidence?” Available at: http://works.bepress.com/anne_richardson_oakes/5
- Buzarovska, G. Nanev, L., Kosevaliska, O. (2015): Вештачењето и „еднаквоста на оружјата, Македонска ревија за казнено право и криминологија, МРКПК, Мај;
- Buzarovska, G, Kalajdziev, G, Matovski, N. (2013): Criminal procedure, Faculty of Law, 2 Avgust, Stip;
- Buzarovska, G., Kalajdziev, G, Misoski B., Ilik, D. (2015): Criminal procedure, Faculty of Law, Skopje;
- Neumeister v Austria, judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no 8, (1979–80) 1 EHRR 91;
- Foucher v France, judgment of 18 Mar 1997, Reports 1997-II, 452, (1998) 25 EHRR 234, paras 26–38;
- Bendenoun v France, judgment of 24 Feb 1994, Series A no 284, (1994) 18 EHRR 54, paras 49–53;
- Mialhe v France (no 2), judgment of 26 Sept 1996, Reports 1996-IV, 1319, (1997) 23 EHRR 491, paras 38 and 44;
- McMicheal v United Kingdom, judgment of 24 Feb 1995, Series A no 307-B, (1995) 20 EHRR 205;
- Vermeulen v Belgium, judgment of 20 Feb 1996, Reports 1996-I, 224, (2001) 32 EHRR 15, para 33;
- Borgers v Belgium, judgment of 30 Oct 1991, Series A no 214-B, (1993) 15 EHRR 92, paras 27–29;
- Ruiz-Mateos v Spain, judgment of 23 June 1993, Series A no 262, (1993) 16 EHRR 505, paras 61–63;
- Nideröst-Huber v Switzerland, judgment of 18 Feb 1997, Reports 1997-I, 101, (1998) 25 EHRR 709, paras 19–32;
- Van de Hurk v Netherlands, judgment of 19 Apr 1994, Series A no 288, (1994) 18 EHRR 481, paras 56–57;
- FR v Switzerland, no 37292/97, judgment of 28 June 2001, paras 35 and 40–41;
- Bulut v Austria, judgment of 22 Feb 1996, Reports 1996-II, 346, (1997) 24 EHRR 84, paras 44–50;
- Apeh Üldözötteinek Szövetsége and Others v Hungary, no 32367/96, ECHR 2000-X, 361, (2002) 34 EHRR 34, paras 42–43;
- Werner v Austria, judgment of 24 Nov 1997, Reports 1997-VII, 2496, (1998) 26 EHRR 310, para 67;
- Jasper v United Kingdom, judgment of 16 Feb 2000, (2000) 30 EHRR 441, paras 55–57;
- Rowe and Davis v United Kingdom, no 28901/95 ECHR 2000-II, (2000) 30 EHRR 1;
- Fitt v United Kingdom, no 29777/96 ECHR 2000-II, (2000) 30 EHRR 480, paras 46–50;
- Kress v France, no 39594/98 ECHR 2001-VI, 41, para 73;
- Kuopila v Finland, no 27752/95, judgment of 27 Apr 2000, (2001) 33 EHRR 25, para 38.
- Pataki and Dunshirn v Austria, App nos 596/59 and 789/60, report of 28 Mar 1963, (1963) 6 YB 718, 732
- Stoimenov v. “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” (no. 17995/02), EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS 211 5.4.2007.