Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A ‘Charter Of Liberties’: Is Refusing The ‘Right To Die’ A Failure To Maintain The Spirit Of Magna Carta? Cover

A ‘Charter Of Liberties’: Is Refusing The ‘Right To Die’ A Failure To Maintain The Spirit Of Magna Carta?

SEEU Review
Volume 11 (2015): Issue 1 (December 2015)
By:   
Open Access
|Jan 2016
References

References

  1. Commision(2011),(Falconer Report) Demos
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Douglas, C et al, ‘The intention to hasten death: a survey of attitudes and practices of surgeons in Australia’ (2001) 175 Med J Aust 511
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Daruwala, K (2003), Review of J Keow’s, Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy, Med LR 1: 256
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Greasley, K (2010) ‘R (Purdy) v DPP and the case for wilful blindness’ Ox J LS 30: 301.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Huxtable, H and Moller, M (2007) ‘ “Setting a Principled Boundary”? Euthanasia as a Response to “Life Fatigue” 21 Bioethics 117
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Jackson, E (2004) “Whose Death is it Anyway? Euthanasia and the Medical Profession” CLP 415
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Keating, H and Bridgeman, J (2012) ‘Compassionate killings: the case for a partial defence’ MLR 75: 697
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Keown, J, Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy (2002)
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Kuhse, H, Singer, P, Baume, P, Clark, M, and Rickard, M (1997) 'End-of-Life Decisions in Australian Medical Practice' 166 Medical Journal of Australia 191.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Lewis, P (2011) “Informal Legal Change on Assisted Suicide: The Policy for Prosecutors”31:119.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Lillehammer, H (2002) ‘Voluntary euthanasia and the logical slippery slope argument (2002) 61 Camb LJ 545.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Magnusson, R (2002) ‘Angels of Death: Exploring the euthanasia underground’ (Melbourne, Melb UP)
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Ost, S (2005) ‘Euthanasia and the defence of necessity’ Crim LR 355
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Ost, S (2010) “The de-medicalisation of assisted dying: is a less medicalised model the way forward?” Med LR 18: 497
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Ost, S and Mullock, A (2011) “Pushing the Boundaries of Lawful Assisted Dying in the Netherlands? Existential Suffering and Lay Assistance” EJ Health Law 18: 163
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Rogers, J (2010) ‘Prosecutorial Policies, Prosecutorial Systems, and theLitigation’ Crim LR 543.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Sanders, A, Young, R and Burton, M (2010)(Oxford: OUP).
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Smith (2005a) ‘Evidence for the practical slippery slope in the debate on PAS and euthanasia’ Med LR 13: 17
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Smith (2005b) ‘Fallacies of the logical slippery slope in the debate on physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia’ Med LR 13: 224
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Tur, R (2002). Just how unlawful is “euthanasia”? Journal of Applied Philosophy, 19: 219
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/seeur-2015-0003 | Journal eISSN: 1857-8462 (formerly 1409-7001) | Journal ISSN: 1409-7001
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 15
Published on: Jan 13, 2016
Published by: South East European University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Related subjects:
General interest

© 2016 Andrew Sanders, published by South East European University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 11 (2015): Issue 1 (December 2015)
Previous article
Next article