Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Exploring Nominalization in the Introduction and Method Sections of Applied Linguistics Research Articles: a Qualitative Approach Cover

Exploring Nominalization in the Introduction and Method Sections of Applied Linguistics Research Articles: a Qualitative Approach

Open Access
|Nov 2017

References

  1. Baratta, A. M. 2010. Nominalization development across an undergraduate academic degree program. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1017-1036.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.007
  2. Bhatia V. K. 1993. Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
  3. Biber, D. 1995. Dimensions of register variation. A cross linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519871
  4. Biber, D., & Gray, B. 2010. Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 2-20.10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001
  5. Biber, D., & Gray, B. 2013. “Nominalizing the verb phrase in academic science writing”. In B. Aarts & G. Leech (Eds.). The verb phrase in English: Investigating recent language change with corpora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 99-13210.1017/CBO9781139060998.006
  6. Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. 2004. The functional analysis of English: A Hallidayan approach. London: Arnold.10.4324/9780203774854
  7. Bondi, M., & Hyland, K. 2006. “Introduction”. In K. Hyland & M. Bondi (Eds.), Academic discourse across disciplines. Germany: Peter Lang. pp. 7-1710.3726/978-3-0351-0446-2
  8. Briones, S., Fortuny, L., Sastre, S., & Pocovi, M. B. 2003. Grammatical metaphors in scientific English. The ESPecialist, 24 (2), 131-142.
  9. Chafe, W., & Danielewicz, J. 1987. “Properties of spoken and written language”. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language. San Diego, C.A.: Academic Press Inc. pp. 83-113
  10. Davtgari Asl, H., & Shahab, S. 2015. Ideational Grammatical Metaphor in Pharmaceutical Research Articles. Journal of Social Issues & Humanities, 3(4), 111-116.
  11. Eggins, S. 2004. An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Continuum.
  12. Galve, G. I. 1998. The textual interplay of grammatical metaphor on the nominalization occurring in written medical English. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 363-385.10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00002-2
  13. Gardner, D., & Davies, M. 2013. A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, 35, 1-24.10.1093/applin/amt015
  14. Granger, S. 1997. “On identifying the syntactic and discourse features of participle clauses in academic English: Native and nonnative writers compared”. In J. Aarts, I. de Monnink, & H. Wekker (Eds.), Studies in English language and teaching. Amsterdam: Rodopi. pp. 185-198
  15. Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
  16. Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
  17. Halliday, M. A. K. 1998. “Things and relations: Regrammaticising experience as technical knowledge”. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. London: Routledge. pp. 185-236
  18. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, M. I. M. 1999. Construing experience through meaning, a language based approach to cognition. New York: Norfolk.
  19. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, M. I. M. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.
  20. Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. 2005.Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  21. Hood, S. 2004. Appraising research: Taking a stance in academic writing. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Technology, Sydney.
  22. Jalilifar, A., Alipour, M., & Parsa, S. 2014. A comparative study of nominalization in applied linguistics and biology books. Research in Applied Linguistics, 5, 24-43.
  23. Kazemian, B., Behnam, B., & Ghafoori, N. 2013. Ideational grammatical metaphor in scientific texts: A Hallidayan perspective. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(4), 146-168.10.5296/ijl.v5i4.4192
  24. Lim, J. M. H. 2006. Method sections of management research articles: A pedagogically motivated qualitative study. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 282-309.10.1016/j.esp.2005.07.001
  25. Mahbudi, A., Mahbudi, L., & Amalsaleh, E. 2014. A comparison between the use of nominalization in medical papers by English and Iranian writers. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 3(6), 1-6.10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.6p.1
  26. Martin, J. R. 2008. Incongruent and proud: De-vilifying nominalization. Discourse and Society, 19, 801-810.10.1177/0957926508095895
  27. Martinez, I. A. 2003. Aspects of theme in the method and discussion sections of biology journal articles in English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 103-123.10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00003-1
  28. Ravelli, J. L. 2003. “Renewal of connection: integrating theory and practice in an understanding of grammatical metaphor”. In A. Simon-Vandenbergen, M. Taverniers, & J. L. Ravelli (Eds.), Grammatical metaphor: Views from systemic functional linguistics (pp. 37-64). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.236.04rav
  29. Sarnackaitė, V. 2011. Nominalization as a cohesive device in political discourse. Unpublished Bachelor thesis, University of Lithuania.
  30. Sayfouri, N. 2010. SFL and ESP genre analysis of English research articles in Iranian and English-American medical journals: A contrastive study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tehran, Iran.
  31. Shirali, F. 2014. A comparative study of nominalization in an English applied linguistics textbook and its Persian translation. Unpublished master's thesis, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz.
  32. Susinskiene, S. 2009. Textual functions of nominalizations in English scientific discourse. Zmogus ir zodis, 11(3), 58-64.
  33. Susinskiene, S. 2010. Nominalization as a cohesive device in British newspaper editorials. Filologija, 15, 142-150.
  34. Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. 1994. Academic writing for graduate students: A course for nonnative speakers of English. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
  35. Taverniers, M. 2003. “Grammatical metaphor in SFL: A historiography of the introduction and initial study of the term”. In A. M. Simon-Vandenbergen, M. Taverniers & L. J.Ravelli (Eds.), Grammatical metaphor: Views from systemic functional linguistics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 236.). Amsterdam: Benjamins. pp.5-3310.1075/cilt.236.02tav
  36. Taverniers, M. 2004. Grammatical metaphors in English. Modern Sprak, 98(1), 17-26.
  37. To, V., Le, T., & Le, Q. 2013. A comparative study of nominalisation in IELTS writing test papers. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research, 1(4), 15-21.
  38. Vongpumivitch, V., Huang, J., & Chang, Y. 2009. Frequency analysis of the words in the Academic Word List (AWL) and non-AWL content words in applied linguistics research papers. English for Specific Purposes, 28, 33-41.10.1016/j.esp.2008.08.003
  39. Wenyan, G. 2012. Nominalization in medical papers: A comparative study. Studies in Literature and Language, 4(1), 86-93.
  40. Xue-feng, W. 2012. Developing nominalization awareness in teaching writing to Chinese learners of English. Sino-US English Teaching, 9(11), 1650-1660.
  41. Zinsser, W. 1980. On writing well. New York: Harper.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rjes-2017-0009 | Journal eISSN: 2286-0428 | Journal ISSN: 1584-3734
Language: English
Page range: 64 - 80
Published on: Nov 30, 2017
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2017 Alireza Jalilifar, Elham Saleh, Alexanne Don, published by West University of Timisoara
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.