References
- Aquario, D., Pais, I., &Ghedin, E. (2018). Accessibilità alla conoscenza e Universal Design. Uno studio esplorativo con docenti e studenti universitari. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION FOR INCLUSION, 5(2), 93-106.
- Bandura, A. (Ed.). (1996). Il senso di autoefficacia. Aspettative su di sé e azione. Edizioni Erickson.
- CAST (2008). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines Version 1.0.
- Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (2005). L’evoluzione della cultura. Odile Jacob.
- Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Dewey J. (1981), Esperienza e educazione, tr. it., La Nuova Italia, Firenze.
- Foster, A. L. (2007). Immersive education’submerges students in online worlds made for learning. Chronicle of HigherEducation, 54(17), A22.
- Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: development, validity and applications. Learning EnvironmentsResearch, 1, 7-33.
- Frauenfelder, E. Z. (1983). La prospettiva educativa tra biologia e cultura. Liguori.
- Gardner, M., Gánem-Gutiérrez, A., Scott, J., Horan, B., & Callaghan, V. I. C. (2011). Immersive education spaces using Open Wonderland from pedagogy through to practice. In Multi-user virtual environments for the classroom: Practical approaches to teaching in virtual worlds (pp. 190-205). IGI Global.
- Ghedin, E., &Mazzocut, S. (2017). Universal Design for Learning to value differencies: An explorative reasearch considering teachers’ perceptions. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, (18), 145-162.
- Goldberg, H. R., &McKhann, G. M. (2000). Student test scores are improved in a virtual learning environment. AdvPhysiolEduc, 23(1), 59-66.
- Goldin, G. A., Epstein, Y. E., Schorr, R. Y., & Warner, L. B. (2011). Beliefs and engagement structures: behind the affective dimension of mathematical learning. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43, 547-560.
- Hektner, J. M., &Asakawa, K. (2001). Learning to like challenges. In M. Csikszentmihalyi, & B. Schneider (Eds.), Becoming adult (pp. 95-112). New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2010). Use of three-dimensional (3-D) immersive virtual worlds in K-12 and higher education settings: A review of the research. British journal of educational technology, 41(1), 33-55.
- Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage, 14(1), S103-S109.10.1006/nimg.2001.0832
- Jeannerod, M. (2013). The Functional Role of Conscious Will in Voluntary Action: Cause or Consequence? A Position Paper. In Brains Top Down: Is Top-Down Causation Challenging Neuroscience? (pp. 103-120). World Scientific.
- Jeannerod, M., &Decety, J. (1995). Mental motor imagery: a window into the representational stages of action. Current opinion in neurobiology, 5(6), 727-732.10.1016/0959-4388(95)80099-9
- Luhmann, N., &Schorr, K. E. (1999). Il sistema educativo. Problemi di riflessività. Armando Editore.
- Mace, R. (1997). What is universal design. The Center for Universal Design at North Carolina State University. Retrieved Retrieved November, 19, 2004.
- Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: a theoretical survey. Journal of human development, 6(1), 93-117.
- Rose, D H, Gravel,J W, (2010), Technology and learning – meeting specialstudents’ needs, Center for Applied Special Technology, Elsevier Ltd.,Wakefield, MA, USA (pp. 119-124)
- Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(4), 47-51.
- Rose, D. H., Gravel, J. W., & Gordon, D. T. (2013). Universal design for learning. The SAGE Handbook of Special Education: Two Volume Set.
- Santoianni, F. (2002). La formazione biodinamica dei sistemi cognitivi: epigenesi e criteri di educabilità. Le scienze bioeducative, 55-69.
- Santoianni, F. (2012a). Evoluzione culturale e sviluppo ontogenetico nella formazione situata delle strutture della conoscenza.
- Santoianni, F. (2012b). L’approccio bioeducativo alla letto-scrittura. Attività didattiche e laboratoriali per la scuola dell’infanzia e la scuola primaria. Edizioni Erickson.
- Santoianni, F. (2014). Modelli di studio. Apprendere con la teoria delle logiche elementari. Edizioni Centro Studi Erickson, Trento.
- Santoianni, F. (2017). Lo spazio e la formazione del pensiero: la scuola come ambiente di apprendimento. RESEARCH TRENDS IN HUMANITIES Education & Philosophy, 4, 37-43.
- Santoianni, F., &Sabatano, C. (2010). Per una pedagogia dello sviluppo: educabilità e formazione delle strutture della conoscenza. Potenzialeumano e patrimonioterritoriale, 149-164.
- Savia, G. (2015). Progettazione Universale per l’Apprendimento: un va-lido approccio per l’inclusione di tutti. Rivista Educare. it, 15(3).
- Shernoff, D. J. (2013). Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement. New York: Springer
- Shernoff, D. J., &Bempechat, J. (Eds.). (2014), Engaging youth in schools: Evi- dence-based models to guide future innovations, 113 (1). Columbia University. by Teachers College Record.
- Shernoff, D. J., Kelly, S., Tonks, S. M., Anderson, B., Cavanagh, R. F., Sinha, S., & Abdi, B. (2016). Student engagement as a function of environmental complexity in high school classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 43, 52-60.
- Story, M. F. (1998). Maximizing usability: the principles of universal design. Assistive technology, 10(1), 4-12.10.1080/10400435.1998.10131955
- Szaszkiewicz, J. (1988). Filosofia della cultura. Gregorian Biblical BookShop. Universal Design for Learning: Wakefield, MA.
- Welch, P. (Ed.). (1995). Strategies for teaching universal design. Mig Communications.
- World Health Organization. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. World Health Organization.