Have a personal or library account? Click to login
What educational leaders should know about social media, collaboration and doctoral learning Cover

What educational leaders should know about social media, collaboration and doctoral learning

Research on Education and Media
Volume 9 (2017): Issue 2 (December 2017)
By: Karen Johnson,  J. Medgar Roberts,  Mary W. Stout,  Michelle Susberry Hill and  Lisa Wells  
Open Access
|Aug 2018

References

  1. Andrews, K. (2016). Correlation between mentors and learners perceptions of mentors’ behaviors in completing online doctoral dissertations. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 16(2), 71-80. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.contentproxy.phoenix.edu/docview/1807473336?accountid=35812
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Autry, M. K., & Carter, M. (2015). Unblocking occluded genres in graduate writing: Thesis and dissertation support services at North Carolina State University. Composition Forum. Retrieved from http://compositionforum.com/archives.php
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Babbie, E. (2013). The practice of social research. Wadsworth: Belmont, CA.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Bennett, L., & Folley, S. (2014, May 26). A tale of two doctoral students: Social media tools and hybridised identities. Research in Learning Technology, 22(1). doi:10.3402/rlt.v22.2379110.3402/rlt.v22.23791
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVIVO 11. Thousands Oaks, CA: SAGE.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Berger, R. (2015). Challenges and strategies in social work and social welfare PhD education: Helping candidates jump through the dissertation hoops. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 35(1/2), 166-178. doi:10.1080/08841233.2014.97354810.1080/08841233.2014.973548
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Chenail, R. J. (2012). Conducting qualitative data analysis: Qualitative data analysis as a metaphoric process. The Qualitative Report, 17(1), 248. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. De Argaez, E. (2017, July 10). World stats. Internet World Stats. Retrieved from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Greenwood, S., Perrin, A., & Duggan, M. (2017). Social media update 2016. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Hamzah, M. H., Yusof, N., Kasim, A., Ngah, K., Mua, J., & Zakaria, Z. (2013). NVivo 11 approach and content analysis in media flow analysis and alternative selected prime: Permatang pauh by-election. Asian Social Science, 9(15), 84. Retrieved from http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Harding-DeKam, J., Hamilton, B., & Loyd, S. (2012). The hidden curriculum of doctoral advising. NACADA Journal, 32(2), 5-16. Retrieved from http://nacadajournal.org/?code=naaa-site10.12930/0271-9517-32.2.5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Hilscher, J. (2013). A case study examining how students make meaning out of using Facebook as a virtual learning community at a Midwestern university (Doctoral dissertation).Retrieved from Iowa State University.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Inman, A. G., & Silverstein, M. E. (2003). Dissertation support group: To dissertate or not is the question. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 17(3), 59. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/wcsp2010.1300/J035v17n03_05
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Kaufhold, K. (2017). Tracing interacting literacy practices in master’s dissertation writing. London Review of Education, 15(1), 73-84. doi:10.18546/LRE.15.1.0710.18546/LRE.15.1.07
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Kuckartz, U. (2014). Qualitative text analysis: A guide to methods, practice & using software. London: SAGE. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/978144628871910.4135/9781446288719
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Lindsay, S. (2015). What works for doctoral students in completing their thesis? Teaching In Higher Education, 20(2), 183-196. doi:10.1080/13562517.2014.97402510.1080/13562517.2014.974025
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Martindale, T., & Dowdy, M. (2010). Personal learning environments. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.) Emerging Technologies in Distance Education (pp. 177–193). Edmonton Alberta Canada: Athabasca University Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Mayring, P. (2000) Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures, and software solution. FQS Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2). http://dx.doi.org.10.17169/fqs1.2.108910.17169/fqs1.2.1089
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Merriam, S.B., & Tisdell, E.J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Brand.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Path to Dissertation Facebook Page (2016). Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/groups/121396684546463/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. QSR International (2017). NVivo Pro 11. Retrieved from http://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo/free-nvivo-resources
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Sanou, B. (2017). ICT facts and figures 2017. International telecommunications union. Geneva.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Salmons, J. (2016). Doing qualitative research online. London: SAGE.10.4135/9781473921955
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Satariyan, A., Getenet, S., Gube, J., & Muhammad, Y. (2015). Exploring Supervisory Support in an Australian University: Perspectives of Doctoral Students in an Education Faculty. Journal of the Australian & New Zealand Student Services Association, (46), 1-12. Retrieved from https://janzssa.scholasticahq.com/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Suny-Levin Institute. (2013). Globalization101.org: Technology and globalization. Retrieved from http://www.globalization101.org/uploads/File/Technology/tech.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Zuber-Skerritt, O. (2015). Participatory action learning and action research (PALAR) for community engagement: A theoretical framework. Educational Research for Social Change, 4(1), 5. Retrieved from http://ersc.nmmu.ac.za/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rem-2017-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2037-0849 | Journal ISSN: 2037-0830
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 32 - 39
Published on: Aug 13, 2018
Published by: SIREM (Società Italiana di Ricerca sull’Educazione Mediale)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
doctoral students,
educational leadership,
personal learning networks (PLN),
qualitative,
social media
Related subjects:
Cultural studies,
Genres and media in cultural studies,
Digital media and communication,
Topics in cultural studies,
Media,
Social sciences,
Education,
Education, other,
Communication science,
Communication technology

© 2018 Karen Johnson, J. Medgar Roberts, Mary W. Stout, Michelle Susberry Hill, Lisa Wells, published by SIREM (Società Italiana di Ricerca sull’Educazione Mediale)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 9 (2017): Issue 2 (December 2017)Next article