Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Uncertainties in target volume delineation in radiotherapy – are they relevant and what can we do about them? Cover

Uncertainties in target volume delineation in radiotherapy – are they relevant and what can we do about them?

Free to read
|May 2016

References

  1. Pötter R, Georg P, Dimopoulos JC, Grimm M, Berger D, Nesvacil N, et al. Clinical outcome of protocol based image (MRI) guided adaptive brachytherapy combined with 3D conformal radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol 2011; 100: 116-23.
  2. van Rij C, Oughlane-Heemsbergen W, Ackerstaff A, Lamers E, Balm A, Rasch C. Parotid gland sparing IMRT for head and neck cancer improves xerostomia related quality of life. Radiat Oncol 2008; 3: 41.
  3. Van de Steene J, Linthout N, De Mey J, Vinh-Hung V, Claassens C, Noppen M, et al. Definition of gross tumor volume in lung cancer: Inter-observer variability. Radiother Oncol 2002; 62: 37-9.
  4. Lee WR, Roach M. III, Michalski J, Moran B, Beyer D. Interobserver variability leads to significant differences in quantifiers of prostate implant adequacy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002; 54: 457-61.
  5. Kim RY, McGinnis SL, Spencer SA, Meredith RF, Jennelle RLS, Salter MM. Conventional four-field pelvic radiotherapy technique without computed tomography-treatment planning in cancer of the cervix: potential geographic miss and its impact on pelvic control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 31: 109-12.
  6. Jansen EPM, Nijkamp J, Gubanski M, Lind PARM, Verheij M. Interobserver variation of clinical target volume delineation in gastric cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol 2010; 77: 1166-70.
  7. Njeh CF, Dong L, Orton CG. IGRT has limited clinical value due to lack of accurate tumor delineation. Med Phys 2008; 33: 136-40.
  8. Weiss E, Hess CF. The impact of gross tumor volume (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV) definition on the total accuracy in radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2003; 179: 21-30.
  9. Thiagarajan A, Caria N, Schöder H, Iyer NG, Wolden S, Wong RJ, et al. Target volume delineation in oropharyngeal cancer: impact of PET, MRI, and physical examination. Int J Radiat Oncol 2012; 83: 220-7.
  10. Weiss E, Richter S, Krauss T, Metzelthin SI, Hille A, Pradier O, et al. Conformal radiotherapy planning of cervix carcinoma: differences in the delineation of the clinical target volume. A comparison between gynaecologic and radiation oncologists. Radiother Oncol 2003; 67: 87-95.
  11. Boersma LJ, Janssen T, Elkhuizen PHM, Poortmans P, van der Sangen M, Scholten AN, et al. Reducing interobserver variation of boost-CTV delineation in breast conserving radiation therapy using a pre-operative CT and delineation guidelines. Radiother Oncol 2012; 103: 178-82.
  12. van Mourik AM, Elkhuizen PHM, Minkema D, Duppen JC, van Vliet-Vroegindeweij C. Multiinstitutional study on target volume delineation variation in breast radiotherapy in the presence of guidelines. Radiother Oncol 2010; 94: 286-91.
  13. Struikmans H, Wárlám-Rodenhuis C, Stam T, Stapper G, Tersteeg RJ, Bol GH, et al. Interobserver variability of clinical target volume delineation of glandular breast tissue and of boost volume in tangential breast irradiation. Radiother Oncol 2005; 76: 293-9.
  14. Altorjai G, Fotina I, Lütgendorf-Caucig C, Stock M, Pötter R, Georg D, et al. Cone-beam CT-based delineation of stereotactic lung targets: the influence of image modality and target size on interobserver variability. Int J Radiat Oncol 2012; 82: e265-e72.
  15. Giraud P, Elles S, Helfre S, De Rycke Y, Servois V, Carette MF, et al. Conformal radiotherapy for lung cancer: Different delineation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) by radiologists and radiation oncologists. Radiother Oncol 2002; 62: 27-36.
  16. Cattaneo GM, Reni M, Rizzo G, Castellone P, Ceresoli GL, Cozzarini C, et al. Target delineation in post-operative radiotherapy of brain gliomas: inter-observer variability and impact of image registration of MR(pre-operative) images on treatment planning CT scans. Radiother Oncol 2005; 75: 217-23.
  17. Rasch C, Steenbakkers R, van Herk M. Target definition in prostate, head, and neck. Semin Radiat Oncol 2005; 15: 136-45.
  18. Tai P, Van Dyk J, Yu E, Battista J, Stitt L, Coad T. Variability of target volume delineation in cervical esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 42: 277-88.
  19. Krengli M, Canillo B, Turri L, Bagnasacco P, Berretta L, Ferrara T, et al. Target volume delineation for preoperative radiotherapy of rectal cancer: inter-observer variability and potential impact of FDG-PET/CT imaging. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2010; 9: 393-8.
  20. Hamilton CS, Joseph DJ, Skov A, Denham JW. CT scanning for definitive radiotherapy planning of prostate cancer: necessity or nicety? Results from survey of radiation oncologists working at different institutions in Australasia. Australas Radiol 1990; 34: 288-92.
  21. Valicenti RK, Sweet JW, Hauck WW, Hudes RS, Lee T, Dicker AP, et al. Variation of clinical target volume definition in three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999; 44: 931-5.
  22. Tanderup K, Nesvacil N, Pötter R, Kirisits C. Uncertainties in image guided adaptive cervix cancer brachytherapy: Impact on planning and prescription. Radiother Oncol 2013; 107: 1-5.
  23. Fotina I, Lütgendorf-Caucig C, Stock M, Pötter R, Georg D. Critical discussion of evaluation parameters for inter-observer variability in target definition for radiation therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2012; 188: 160-7.
  24. Rasch CRN, Steenbakkers RJHM, Fitton I, Duppen JC, Nowak PJ, Pameijer FA, et al. Decreased 3D observer variation with matched CT-MRI, for target delineation in Nasopharynx cancer. Radiat Oncol 2010; 5: 21.
  25. Petrič P, Hudej R, Rogelj P, Blas M, Tanderup K, Fidarova E, et al. Uncertainties of target volume delineation in MRI guided adaptive brachytherapy of cervix cancer: a multi-institutional study. Radiother Oncol 2013; 107: 6-12.
  26. Seddon B, Bidmead M, Wilson J, Khoo V, Dearnaley D. Target volume definition in conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: quality assurance in the MRC RT-01 trial. Radiother Oncol 2000; 56: 73-83.
  27. Steenbakkers RJHM, Duppen JC, Fitton I, Deurloo KE, Zijp LJ, Comans EF, et al. Reduction of observer variation using matched CT-PET for lung cancer delineation: A three-dimensional analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 64: 435-48.
  28. Genovesi D, Cèfaro GA, Vinciguerra A, Augurio A, Di Tommaso M, Marchese R, et al. Interobserver variability of clinical target volume delineation in supra-diaphragmatic {Hodgkin}’s disease: a multi-institutional experience. Strahlenther Onkol 2011; 187: 357-66.
  29. Genovesi D, Ausili Cèfaro G, Trignani M, Vinciguerra A, Augurio A, Di Tommaso M, et al. Interobserver variability of clinical target volume delineation in soft-tissue sarcomas. Cancer Radiother 2014; 18: 89-96.
  30. Hong TS, Tome WA, Harari PM. Heterogeneity in head and neck IMRT target design and clinical practice. Radiother Oncol 2012; 103: 92-8.
  31. Buijsen J, van den Bogaard J, van der Weide H, Engelsman S, van Stiphout R, Janssen M, et al. FDG–PET–CT reduces the interobserver variability in rectal tumor delineation. Radiother Oncol 2012; 102: 371-6.
  32. Nijkamp J, de Haas-Kock DFM, Beukema JC, Neelis KJ, Woutersen D, Ceha H, et al. Target volume delineation variation in radiotherapy for early stage rectal cancer in the Netherlands. Radiother Oncol 2012; 102: 14-21.
  33. Patel DA, Chang ST, Goodman KA, Quon A, Thorndyke B, Gambhir SS, et al. Impact of integrated PET/CT on variability of target volume delineation in rectal cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2007; 6: 31-6.
  34. Gwynne S, Spezi E, Wills L, Nixon L, Hurt C, Joseph G, et al. Toward semi-automated assessment of target volume delineation in radiotherapy trials: The SCOPE 1 Pretrial Test Case. Int J Radiat Oncol 2012; 84: 1037-42.
  35. Petric P, Hudej R, Rogelj P, Blas M, Segedin B, Logar HB, et al. Comparison of 3D MRI with high sampling efficiency and 2D multiplanar MRI for contouring in cervix cancer brachytherapy. Radiol Oncol 2012; 46: 242-51.
  36. Fox JL, Rengan R, O’Meara W, Yorke E, Erdi Y, Nehmeh S, et al. Does registration of PET and planning CT images decrease interobserver and intraobserver variation in delineating tumor volumes for non-small-cell lung cancer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 62: 70-5.
  37. Leunens G, Weltens A, Vertraete J, van der Schuren E. Quality assessment of medical decision making in radiation oncology: variability in target volume delineation for brain tumours. Radiother Oncol 1993; 29: 169-75.
  38. Weltens C, Menten J, Feron M, Bellon E, Demaerel P, Maes F, et al. Interobserver variations in gross tumor volume delineation of brain tumors on computed tomography and impact of magnetic resonance imaging. Radiother Oncol 2001; 60: 49-59.
  39. Villeirs GM, Van Vaerenbergh K, Vakaet L, Bral S, Claus F, De Neve WJ, et al. Interobserver delineation variation using CT versus combined CT + MRI in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2005; 181: 424-30.
  40. Segedin B, But Hadzic J, Rogelj P, Sesek M, Zobec Logar HB, Kragelj B, et al. Interobserver variation in MRI and CT based contouring for prostate cancer. [Abstract]. Radiother Oncol 2011; 99(Suppl 1): S285.
  41. Giezen M, Kouwenhoven E, Scholten AN, Coerkamp EG, Heijenbrok M, Jansen WP, et al. MRI- versus CT-based volume delineation of lumpectomy cavity in supine position in breast-conserving therapy: An exploratory study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 82: 1332-40.
  42. Giezen M, Kouwenhoven E, Scholten AN, Coerkamp EG, Heijenbrok M, Jansen WP, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging– versus computed tomography–based target volume delineation of the glandular breast tissue (clinical target volume breast) in breast-conserving therapy: an exploratory study. Int J Radiat Oncol 2011; 81: 804-11.
  43. Major T, Gutiérrez C, Guix B, Mózsa E, Hannoun-Levi JM, Lössl K, et al. Interobserver variations of target volume delineation in multicatheter partial breast brachytherapy after open cavity surgery. Brachytherapy 2015; 14: 925-32.
  44. Steenbakkers RJH, Deurloo KE, Nowak PJC, Lebesque JV, van Herk M, Rasch CR. Reduction of dose delivered to the rectum and bulb of the penis using MRI delineation for radiotherapy of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol 2003; 57: 1269-79.
  45. Emami B, Sethi A, Petruzzelli GJ. Influence of MRI on target volume delineation and IMRT planning in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 57: 481-8.
  46. Hellebust TP, Tanderup K, Lervåg C, Fidarova E, Berger D, Malinen E, et al. Dosimetric impact of interobserver variability in MRI-based delineation for cervical cancer brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2013; 107: 13-9.
  47. Gwynne S, Spezi E, Sebag-Montefiore D, Mukherjee S, Miles E, Conibear J, et al. Improving radiotherapy quality assurance in clinical trials: assessment of target volume delineation of the pre-accrual benchmark case. Br J Radiol 2013; 86: 20120398.
  48. Schimek-Jasch T, Troost EG, Rucker G, Prokic V, Avlar M, Duncker-Rohr V, et al. A teaching intervention in a contouring dummy run improved target volume delineation in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Reducing the interobserver variability in multicentre clinical studies. StrahlentherOnkol 2015; 191: 525-33.
  49. Khoo ELH, Schick K, Plank AW, Poulsen M, Wong WW, Middleton M, et al. Prostate contouring variation: Can it be fixed? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 82: 1923-29.
  50. Steenbakkers RJHM, Duppen JC, Fitton I, Deurloo KE, Zijp L, Uitterhoeve AL, et al. Observer variation in target volume delineation of lung cancer related to radiation oncologist–computer interaction: A “Big Brother” evaluation. Radiother Oncol 2005; 77: 182-90.
  51. Mamede M, El Fakhri G, Abreu-e-Lima P, Gandler W, Nosé V, Gerbaudo VH. Pre-operative estimation of esophageal tumor metabolic length in FDG-PET images with surgical pathology confirmation. Ann Nucl Med 2007; 21: 553-62.
  52. Zhong X, Yu J, Zhang B, Mu D, Zhang W, Li D, et al. Using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to estimate the length of gross tumor in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 73: 136-41.
  53. Bradley J, Bae K, Choi N, Forster K, Siegel BA, Brunetti J, et al. A phase II comparative study of gross tumor volume definition with or without PET/ CT fusion in dosimetric planning for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): primary analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0515. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 82: 435-41.
  54. Schaefer A, Kim YJ, Kremp S, Mai S, Fleckenstein J, Bohnenberger H, et al. PET-based delineation of tumour volumes in lung cancer: comparison with pathological findings. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013; 40: 1233-44.
  55. Daisne J-F, Duprez T, Weynand B, Lonneux M, Hamoir M, Reychler H, et al. Tumor volume in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison at CT, MR imaging, and FDG PET and validation with surgical specimen. Radiology 2004; 233: 93-100.
  56. Breen SL, Publicover J, De Silva S, Pond G, Brock K, O’Sullivan B, et al. Intraobserver and Interobserver Variability in GTV Delineation on FDG-PETCT Images of Head and Neck Cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol 2007; 68: 763-70.
  57. Geets X, Daisne J-F, Arcangeli S, Coche E, De Poel M, Duprez T, et al. Inter-observer variability in the delineation of pharyngo-laryngeal tumor, parotid glands and cervical spinal cord: Comparison between CT-scan and MRI. Radiother Oncol 2005; 77: 25-31.
  58. Anderson CM, Sun W, Buatti JM, Maley JE, Policeni B, Mott SL, et al. Interobserver and intermodality variability in GTV delineation on simulation CT, FDG-PET, and MR images of head and neck cancer. Jacobs J Radiat Oncol 2014; 1: 006.
  59. Rasch CRN, Barillot I, Remeijer P, Touw A, van Herk M, Lebesque J V. Definition of the prostate in CT and MRI: a multi-observer study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999; 43: 57-66.
  60. Barkati M, Simard D, Taussky D, Delouya G. Magnetic resonance imaging for prostate bed radiotherapy planning: An inter- and intra-observer variability study. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2015: Nov 16. 10.1111/17549485.12416. [Epub ahead of print].
  61. Haie-Meder C, Pötter R, Van Limbergen E, Briot E, De Brabandere M, Dimopoulos J, et al. Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GECESTRO Working Group (I): concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV. Radiother Oncol 2005; 74: 235-45.
  62. Small W Jr, Mell LK, Anderson P, Creutzberg C, De Los Santos J, Gaffney D, et al. Consensus guidelines for delineation of clinical target volume for intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy in postoperative treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 71: 428-34.
  63. Harris VA, Staffurth J, Naismith O, Esmail A, Gulliford S, Khoo V et al. Consensus guidelines and contouring atlas for pelvic node delineation in prostate and pelvic node intensity modulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol 2015; 92: 874-83.
  64. Grégoire V, Ang K, Budach W, Grau C, Hamoir M, Langendijk JA, et al. Delineation of the neck node levels for head and neck tumors: A 2013 update. DAHANCA, EORTC, HKNPCSG, NCIC CTG, NCRI, RTOG, TROG consensus guidelines. Radiother Oncol 2014; 110: 172-81.
  65. Nielsen MH, Berg M, Pedersen AN, Andersen K, Glavicic V, Jakobsen EH, et al. Delineation of target volumes and organs at risk in adjuvant radiotherapy of early breast cancer: National guidelines and contouring atlas by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. Acta Oncol (Madr) 2013; 52: 703-10.
  66. Lim K, Small W, Portelance L, Creutzberg C, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Mundt A, et al. Consensus guidelines for delineation of clinical target volume for intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy for the definitive treatment of cervix cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol 2011; 79: 348-55.
  67. Wu AJ, Bosch WR, Chang DT, Hong TS, Jabbour SK, Kleinberg LR et al. Expert consensus contouring guidelines for intensity modulated radiation therapy in esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol 2015; 92: 911-20.
  68. Fuller CD, Nijkamp J, Duppen J, Rasch CR, Thomas CR Jr, Wang SJ, et al. Prospective randomized double-blind pilot study of site-specific consensus atlas implementation for rectal cancer target volume delineation in the cooperative group setting. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 79: 481-9.
  69. Wong EK, Truong PT, Kader HA, Nichol AM, Salter L, Petersen R, et al. Consistency in seroma contouring for partial breast radiotherapy: impact of guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 66: 372-6.
  70. Senan S, van Sornsen de Koste J, Samson M, Tankink H, Jansen P, Nowak PJ, et al. Evaluation of a target contouring protocol for 3D conformal radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol 1999; 53: 247-55.
  71. Mitchell DM, Perry L, Smith S, Elliott T, Wylie JP, Cowan RA, et al. Assessing the effect of a contouring protocol on postprostatectomy radiotherapy clinical target volumes and interphysician variation. Int J Radiat Oncol 2009; 75: 990-3.
  72. Bowden P, Fisher R, Mac Manus M, Wirth A, Duchesne G, Millward M, et al. Measurement of lung tumor volumes using three-dimensional computer planning software. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002; 53: 566-73.
  73. Jefferies S, Taylor A, Reznek R. Results of a national survey of radiotherapy planning and delivery in the UK in 2007. Clin Oncol 2009; 21: 204-17.
  74. Hurkmans CW, Borger JH, Pieters BR, Russell NS, Jansen EPM, Mijnheer BJ. Variability in target volume delineation on CT scans of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001; 50: 1366-72.
  75. Dewas S, Bibault J-E, Blanchard P, Vautravers-Dewas C, Pointreau Y, Denis F, et al. Delineation in thoracic oncology: a prospective study of the effect of training on contour variability and dosimetric consequences. Radiat Oncol 2011; 6: 118.
  76. Szumacher E, Harnett N, Warner S, Kelly V, Danjoux C, Barker R, et al. Effectiveness of educational intervention on the congruence of prostate and rectal contouring as compared with a gold standard in three-dimensional radiotherapy for prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 76: 379-85.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/raon-2016-0023 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 254 - 262
Submitted on: Dec 29, 2015
|
Accepted on: Feb 1, 2016
|
Published on: May 9, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2016 Barbara Segedin, Primoz Petric, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.