Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Diagnostic accuracy of MRI to evaluate tumour response and residual tumour size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients

Open Access
|Feb 2016

References

  1. Hortobagy GN, Ames FC, Buzdar AU, Kau SW, McNeese MD, Paulus D, et al. Management of stage III primary breast cancer with primary chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy. Cancer 1988; 62: 2507-16.
  2. Mauriac L, Durand M, Avril A, Dilhuydy JM. Effects of primary chemotherapy in conservative treatment of breast cancer patients with operable tumors larger than 3 cm: Results of a randomized trial in a single centre. Ann Oncol 1991; 2: 347-54.
  3. Schwartz GF, Birchansky CA, Komarnicky LT, Mansfield CM, Cantor RI, Biermann WA, et al. Induction chemotherapy followed by breast conservation for locally advanced carcinoma of the breast. Cancer 1994; 73: 362-9.
  4. Calais G, Berger C, Descamps P, Chapet S, Reynaud-Bougnoux A, Body G, et al. Conservative treatment feasibility with induction chemotherapy , surgery, and radiotherapy for patients with breast carcinoma larger than 3 cm. Cancer 1994; 74: 1283-8.
  5. Singletary SE, McNeese MD, Hortobagyi GN. Feasibility of breast-conservation surgery after induction chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma. Cancer 1992; 69: 2849-52.
  6. Kuerer HM, Newman LA, Smith TL, Ames FC, Hunt KK, Dhingra K, et al. Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 460-9.
  7. van der Hage JA, van de Velde CJ, Julien JP, Tubiana-Hulin M, Vandervelden C, Duchateau L. Preoperative chemotherapy in primary operable breast cancer: results from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10902. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 4224-37.
  8. Bear HD, Anderson S, Brown A, Smith R, Mamounas EP, Fisher B, et al. The effect on tumor response of adding sequential preoperative docetaxel to preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Preliminary results from NSABP B-27. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 4165-74.
  9. Bear HD, Anderson S, Smith RE, Geyer CE Jr, Mamounas EP, Fisher B, et al. Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 2019-27.
  10. Scholl SM, Fourquet A, Asselain B, Pierga JY, Vilcoq JR, Durand JC, et al. Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal patients with tumours considered too large for breast conserving surgery: Preliminary results of a randomized trial: S6. Eur J Cancer 1994; 30A: 645-52.
  11. Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N, Mamounas E, Brown A, Fisher ER, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 2672-85.
  12. Mauriac L, Macgrogan G, Avril A, Durand M, Floquet A, Debled M, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast breast carcinoma larger than 3 cm: a unicenter randomized trial with a 124 month median follow up. Am Oncol 1999; 10: 47-52.
  13. Feldman LD, Hortobagyi GN, Buzdar AU, Ames FC, Blumenschain GR. Pathologic assessment of response to induction chemotherapy in breast cancer. Cancer Res 1986; 46: 2578-81
  14. Chollet P, Charrier S, Brain E, Curé H, van Praagh I, Feillel V, et al. Clinical and pathological response to primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 1997; 33: 862-6.
  15. Kuerer HM, Newman LA, Buzdar AU, Dhingra K, Hunt KK, Buchholz TA, et al. Pathologic tumor response in the breast following neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts axillary lymph node status. Cancer J Sci Am 1998; 4: 230-6.
  16. Goldstein NS, Decker D, Severson D, Schell S, Vicini F, Margolis J, et al. Molecular classification system identifies invasive breast carcinoma patients who are most likely and those who are least likely to achieve a complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer 2007; 110: 1687-96.
  17. Abraham DC, Jones RC, Jones SE, Cheek JH, Peters GN, Knox SM, et al. Evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic response of locally advanced breast cancer by magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 1996: 78: 91-100.
  18. Esserman L, Hylton N, Yassa L, Barclay J, Frankel S, Sickles E. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 110-9.
  19. Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC, Kempe A, Wardelmann E, Hocke A, et al. Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: Preliminary results. Radiology 2000; 215: 267-79.
  20. Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, Besnard PE, Zonderland HM, Obdeijn IM, et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 427-37.
  21. Berg WA, Gutiérrez L, NessAiver MS, Carter WB, Bhargaven M, Lewis RS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 2004; 233: 830-49.
  22. Schott AF, Roubidoux MA, Helvie MA, Hayes DF, Kleer CG, Newman LA et al. Clinical and radiologic assessments to predict breast cancer pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005; 92: 231-8.
  23. Balu-Mastro C, Chapellier C, Bleuse A, Chanalet I, Chauvel C, Largillier R.. Imaging in evaluation of response to neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment benefits of MRI. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002; 72: 145-52.
  24. Bodini M, Berruti A, Bottini A, Allevi G, Fiorentino C, Brizzi MP, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in comparison to clinical palpation in assessing the response of breast cancer to epirubicin primary chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004; 85: 211-8.
  25. Segara D, Krop IE, Garber JE, Wine E, Harris L, Bellon JR, et al. Does MRI predict pathologic tumor response in women with breast cancer undergoing preoperative chemotherapy? J Surg Oncol 2007; 96: 474-80.
  26. Kim HJ, Im YH, Han BK, Choi N, Choi N, Lee J, Kim JH, et al. Accuracy of MRI for estimating residual tumor size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: relations to response patterns on MRI. Acta Oncol 2007; 46: 996-1003.
  27. Fangberget A, Nilsen LB, Hole KH, Holmen MM, Engebraaten O, Naume B, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer response evaluation and prediction to treatment using dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 1188-99.
  28. Dongfeng H, Daqing D, Erhu J. Dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging: pretreatment prediction of tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Breast Cancer 2012; 12: 94-101.
  29. Nadrljanski MM, Milosevic ZC, Plesinac-Karapandzic V, Maksimovic R. MRI in the evaluation of breast cancer patient response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: predictive factors for breast conservative surgery. Diagn Interv Radiol 2013; 19: 463-70.
  30. Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thürlimann B, Senn HJ. Strategies for subtypes-dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 2011; 22: 1736-47.
  31. Straver ME, Loo CE, Rutgers EJT, Oldenburg HS, Wesseling J, Vrancken Peeters MJ, et al. MRI model to guide the surgical treatment in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg 2010; 251: 701-7.
  32. Chen JH, Feig B, Agrawal G, Yu H, Carpenter PM, Mehta RS, et al. MRI evaluation of pathologically complete response and residual tumours in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer 2008; 112: 17-26.
  33. Williams M, Eatrides J, Kim J, Talwar H; Esposito N, Szabuni M, et al. Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging clinical tumor size with pathological tumor size in patients status post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Am J Surg 2013; 206: 567-73.
  34. McGuire KP, Toro-Burguete J, Dang H, Young J, Soran A, Zuley M, et al. MRI staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: does tumor biology affect accuracy? Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 3149-54.
  35. Lobbes MB, Prevos R, Smidt M, Tjan-Heijnen VC, van Goethem M, Schipper R, et al. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing residual disease and pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review. Insights Imaging 2013; 4: 163-75.
  36. Ko ES, Han BK, Kim RB, Ko EY, Shin JH, Hahn SY, et al. Analysis of factors that influence the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for predicting response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20: 2562-8.
  37. Chen JH, Bahri S, Mehta RS, Chen JH, Bahri S, et al. Impact of factors affecting the residual tuor size diagnosed by MRI following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in comparison to pathology. J Surg Oncol 2014; 109: 158-67.
  38. Moon H-G, Han W, Ahn SK, Cho N, Moon WK, Im SA, et al. Breast cancer molecular phenotype and the use of HER2-targeted agents influence the accuracy of breast MRI after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg 2013; 257: 133-7.
  39. Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Piccart-Gebhart M, Thürlimann B, et al. Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013. Ann Oncol 2013; 24: 2206-23.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/raon-2016-0007 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 73 - 79
Submitted on: Sep 30, 2015
Accepted on: Dec 30, 2015
Published on: Feb 16, 2016
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2016 Alberto Bouzón, Benigno Acea, Rafaela Soler, Ángela Iglesias, Paz Santiago, Joaquín Mosquera, Lourdes Calvo, Teresa Seoane-Pillado, Alejandra García, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.