Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mechanical, durability, and microstructure analysis of concrete made with metakaolin and copper slag for sustainable construction Cover

Mechanical, durability, and microstructure analysis of concrete made with metakaolin and copper slag for sustainable construction

Open Access
|Dec 2025

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Cluster diagram showing the relationship of mechanical properties.
Cluster diagram showing the relationship of mechanical properties.

Figure 2

X-ray diffraction of MK.
X-ray diffraction of MK.

Figure 3

X-ray diffraction of CS.
X-ray diffraction of CS.

Figure 4

Particle size distribution of NS and CS.
Particle size distribution of NS and CS.

Figure 5

Methodology for the work performed.
Methodology for the work performed.

Figure 6

Testing of specimens. (a) Cube specimen, (b) beam specimen, (c) cylindrical specimen, (d) RCPT testing, and (e) RCPT specimen.
Testing of specimens. (a) Cube specimen, (b) beam specimen, (c) cylindrical specimen, (d) RCPT testing, and (e) RCPT specimen.

Figure 7

Density and workability for different concrete mixes.
Density and workability for different concrete mixes.

Figure 8

Variation in the compressive strength for concrete mixes.
Variation in the compressive strength for concrete mixes.

Figure 9

Variation in the flexural strength for concrete mixes.
Variation in the flexural strength for concrete mixes.

Figure 10

Variation in the splitting tensile strength for concrete mixes.
Variation in the splitting tensile strength for concrete mixes.

Figure 11

Variation in charge passes for different concrete mixes.
Variation in charge passes for different concrete mixes.

Figure 12

Microstructural analysis of the concrete with 10% MK and 30% CS. (a) No porosity observed, (b) aluminosilicate bonding between interface, (c) presence of Ca and Al at the interface, and (d) energy dispersive spectrograph of concrete.
Microstructural analysis of the concrete with 10% MK and 30% CS. (a) No porosity observed, (b) aluminosilicate bonding between interface, (c) presence of Ca and Al at the interface, and (d) energy dispersive spectrograph of concrete.

Figure 13

Predicted and actual (a) compressive strength and (b) flexural strength.
Predicted and actual (a) compressive strength and (b) flexural strength.

Figure 14

Three-dimensional surface representation for (a) compressive strength and (b) flexural strength.
Three-dimensional surface representation for (a) compressive strength and (b) flexural strength.

Figure 15

Desirability chart for factors and responses considered in the study.
Desirability chart for factors and responses considered in the study.

Figure 16

Contour surface plots for (a) compressive strength, (b) flexural strength, and (c) desirability of the model.
Contour surface plots for (a) compressive strength, (b) flexural strength, and (c) desirability of the model.

Percentage of constituents of concrete for different mixes

S.NMixProportion
CementFine aggregateCA
OPCMKNS CS
1CC1000100100
2CS1010009010100
3CS2010008020100
4CS3010007030100
5CS4010006040100
6MK5CS309557030100
7MK10CS3090107030100
8MK15CS3085157030100

Test results for 7, 14, 28, and 56 days curing

S.NMixSlump (mm)Compressive strength (N·mm−2)Flexural strength (N·mm−2)Split tensile strength (N·mm−2)Density (kg·m−3)
714285628562856
1CC9036.6937.7839.5341.227.858.112.862.912630.37
2CS1010039.8042.6746.2348.768.909.282.963.032634.07
3CS2010541.7844.4448.5550.929.249.883.153.242654.81
4CS3011043.5645.7850.3353.169.5210.13.463.552723.70
5CS4012037.7840.0048.6651.988.408.873.253.432752.59
6MK5CS3010040.2248.4153.3356.439.6010.153.543.662666.67
7MK10CS309441.5649.4457.7861.4310.210.653.703.812652.00
8MK15CS309140.1148.5456.8960.119.8010.453.643.752622.22

Physical properties of coarse and fine aggregate

ComponentNSCSCoarse aggregate
Specific gravity (g/cc)2.643.312.89
Water absorption (%)1.060.870.89
Fineness modulus2.842.866.93
Bulk of sand (%)28
Chemical properties of fine aggregates
SiO2 73.7920.328
K2O3.460.723
CaO1.792.721
MgO0.470.859
P2O5 0.130.1
Fe2O3 2.6964.733
Al2O3 15.393.076
Na2O0.590.425
TiO2 0.340.391

Responses provided for the MK and CS factors

S.NFactor 1, MK (%)Factor 2, CS (%)Response 1, compressive strength (MPa)Response 2, flexural strength (MPa)
10039.537.85
201046.238.90
302048.559.24
403050.339.52
504048.668.40
653053.339.60
7103057.7710.20
8153056.889.80

Chemical properties of cement and MK

ComponentCementMK
SiO2 18.8954.899
K2O1.140.162
CaO62.370.279
MgO0.990.914
P2O5 0.120.03
Fe2O3 3.830.799
Al2O3 4.2438.145
Na2O0.120.01
TiO2 0.302.061

Quantity of constituents of concrete (in kg·m−3)

S.NMixCement (kg·m−3)Fine aggregate (kg·m−3)CASuper plasticizerW/C ratio
OPCMKNSCS
1CC350701.181368.173.500.45
2CS10350631.0688.081368.173.500.45
3CS20350560.94176.161368.173.500.45
4CS30350490.83264.251368.173.500.45
5CS40350420.71352.331368.173.500.45
6MK5CS30332.517.5490.05263.831366.023.500.45
7MK10CS30315.035.0489.28263.411363.863.500.45
8MK15CS30297.552.5488.51263.001361.703.500.45

Regression equations for the various parameter levels

ResponsesRegression model R 2 Eq.
Compressive strength (MPa)=54.81 + 3.61A + 4.40B + 0.0000AB − 2.18A² − 4.84B²0.9880(1)
Flexural strength (MPa)=10.09 + 0.3108A + 0.3309B + 0.0000AB − 0.3884A² − 1.24B²0.9552(2)
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 6, 2024
Accepted on: Jul 18, 2025
Published on: Dec 9, 2025
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Amruta Yadav, Ajay Gajbhiye, Dhiraj Agrawal, Khalid Ansari, Abdullah H. Alsabhan, Krishna Prakash Arunachalam, Siva Avudaiappan, Nelson Maureira-Carsalade, Osamah J. Alsareji, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.