Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Waste Management: The Case of Poland Cover

Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Waste Management: The Case of Poland

Quaestiones Geographicae
Volume 35 (2016): Issue 2 (June 2016)
By:   
Open Access
|Jun 2016
References

References

  1. Amin A., 2009. Institutionalism. In: Gregory D., johnston r., Pratt G., Watts M., Whatmore S. (eds), The Dictionary of Human Geography, 5th edition. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, Oxford, Chichester: 386.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Bartkowski j., 2003. Tradycja i polityka: wpływ tradycji kulturowych polskich regionów na współczesne zachowania społeczne i polityczne (Tradition and politics: Effect of the cultural traditions of Polish regions on modern types of social and political behaviour). Instytut socjologii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Bel G., Costas A., 2006. Do public sector reforms get rusty? Local privatization in Spain. Journal of Policy Reform 9: 1-24.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Bel G., Fageda X., 2006. Between privatization and intermunicipal cooperation: Small municipalities, scale economies and transaction costs. Urban Public Economics Review 6: 13-31.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Bel G., Fageda X., 2008. Local privatization, intermunicipal cooperation, transaction costs and political interests: Evidence from Spain. Working Papers, Research Institute of Applied Economics, University of Barcelona.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Bel G., Fageda X., Mur M., 2013. Why do municipalities cooperate to provide local public services? An empirical analysis. Local Government Studies 39(3): 435-454.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Bel G., Mur M., 2009. Intermunicipal cooperation, privatization and waste management costs: Evidence from rural municipalities. Waste Management 29: 2772-2778.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Bel G., Warner M.E., 2013. Factors explaining inter-municipal cooperation in service delivery: A meta-regression analysis. Paper presented at Public Management research Association Conference. Madison, WI, june 22, 2013.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Bel G., Warner M., 2015. Inter-municipal cooperation and costs: Expectations and evidence. Public Administration 93(1): 52-67.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Blom-Hansen j., 1997. A new institutional perspective on policy networks. Public Administration 75(4): 669-693.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Bolgherini S., 2011. Local government and inter-municipal cooperation in Italy and Germany. Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Giessen.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Dabrowski M., 2014. EU Cohesion Policy, horizontal partnership and the patterns of sub-national governance: Insights from Central and Eastern Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies 21(4): 364-383.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Delcamp A. 1997. La coopération intercommunale en Europe. In: Rangeon F. (ed.), L’intercommunalité Bilan et perspectives. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris: 91-112.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. DiMaggio P.j., Powell W.W., 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48(2): 147-160.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Dyba M.W., stryjakiewicz T., 2012. Zróżnicowanie poziomu rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego gmin województwa wielkopolskiego w świetle realizacji polityki intraregionalnej (Differences in the socio-economic development of Wielkopolska municipalities in the light of the implementation of an intra-regional policy). Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Featherstone K., radaelli C., 2003. The politics of Europeanization. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Furmankiewicz M., stefańska j., 2010. Partnerstwa terytorialne jako sieci organizacyjne. Analiza powiązań w trzech wybranych “Lokalnych Grupach Działania” w Polsce (Territorial partnerships as organisational networks. An analysis of links in three selected “Local Action Groups” in Poland). Studia Regionalne i Lokalne 1(39): 5-25.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Good practices in inter-municipal cooperation in Europe, 2007. Report of the European Committee on Local and Regional Democracy, Council of Europe, Brussels.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Gorzelak G., jałowiecki B., 1996. Koniunktura gospodarcza i mobilizacja społeczna w gminach ’95. raport z I etapu badań (Economic situation and social mobilisation in municipalities ’95). Studia Regionalne i Lokalne 16(49), Uni wersytet Warszawski.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Gorzelak G., jałowiecki B., 2014. Koniunktura w Polsce lokalnej 2013 (Economic situation in local Poland 2013). Studia Regionalne i Lokalne 4(58): 5-24.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Hall P., Taylor R., 1996. Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies 44(5): 936-957.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Hausner j. (ed.), 2013. Narastające dysfunkcje, zasadnicze dylematy, konieczne działania. Raport o stanie samorządności terytorialnej w Polsce (Growing dysfunctions, fundamental dilemmas, necessary steps. Report on the state of local self-government in Poland). Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny, Kraków.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Helmke G., Levitsky S., 2004. Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on Politics 2(4): 725-740.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Hulst R., van Montfort A., 2007a. Inter-municipal cooperation: A widespread phenomenon. In: Hulst R., van Mont fort A. (eds), Inter-municipal cooperation in Europe. Springer, Dordrecht: 1-21.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Hulst R., van Montfort A., 2007b. The Netherlands: Cooperation as the only viable strategy. In: Hulst r., van Montfort A. (eds), Inter-municipal cooperation in Europe. Springer, Dordrecht: 139-168.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Hulst R., van Montfort A. 2007c. Comparative analysis and conclusions. In: Hulst R., van Montfort A. (eds), Inter- municipal cooperation in Europe. Springer, Dordrecht: 211-238.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Hulst R., van Montfort A. 2012. Institutional features of inter- municipal cooperation: Cooperative arrangements and their national contexts. Public Policy and Administration 27(2): 1-24.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Hulst, R., van Montfort A., Haveri, A., Airaksinen j., Kelly j., 2009. Institutional shifts in inter-municipal service delivery. Public Organization Review 9(3): 263-285.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. John P., 2001. Local governance in Western Europe. sAGE Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Kaczmarek T., Mikuła ł., 2007. Metropolitan areas in Poland: Towards a new scale of urban governance? Quaestiones Geographicae 26B: 97-105.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Kaczmarek T., Mikuła ł., 2009. Metropolitan areas in Poland: Problems of development and governance. Quaestiones Geographicae 28B/2: 91-103.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Kołsut B., 2015. Zinstytucjonalizowane sieci współdziałania międzygminnego w Polsce (Institutionalised inter-municipal networks in Poland). Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Kowalski M., 2000. Geografia wyborcza Polski. Przestrzenne zróżnicowanie zachowań wyborczych Polaków w latach 1989-1998 (The electoral geography of Poland. Spatial differences in electoral behaviour, 1989-1998). Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN, Warszawa.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Kowalski M., 2003. Polaryzacja zachowań wyborczych w Polsce jako rezultat cywilizacyjnego rozdarcia kraju (Polarisation of electoral behaviour in Poland as a result of the country’s civilisational split). In: Kowalski M. (ed.), Przestrzeń wyborcza Polski. Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN, Warszawa: 11-48.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Labianca M., 2014. Inter-municipal cooperation: from cooperation through rules to cooperation through networks - empirical evidence from Puglia. Regional Studies, Regional Science 1(1): 184-206.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. Les collectivités locales en chiffres, 2014. Direction générale des collectivités locales. Online: http://www.collectivites-locales.gouv.fr/collectivites-locales-chiffres-2014 (accessed 10 December 2015).
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. March j.G., Olsen j.P., 1987. Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. Free Press, New York.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Nieto Garrido E., 2007. Inter-municipal co-operation in Spain: Dealing with microscopic local government. In: Hulst R., van Montfort A. (eds), Inter-municipal cooperation in Europe. Springer, Dordrecht: 169-192.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. Niziołek M., 2008. Problemy ustroju aglomeracji miejskich ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem Warszawy (Problems in the form of government of urban agglomerations with special focus on Warsaw). Wolters Kluwer Polska, Warszawa.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Ofiarska M., 2008. Formy publicznoprawne współdziałania jednostek samorządu terytorialnego. Monografia prawnicza (Public- law forms of cooperation of self-government units. Legal monograph). Wydawnictwo Beck, Warszawa.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Ollson A.R., Cars G., 2011. Polycentric spatial development: Institutional challenges to intermunicipal cooperation. Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft 31(2): 155-171.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. Ostrom E., 1986. An agenda for the study of institutions. Public Choice 48: 3-25.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. Provan K., Kenis P., 2008. Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(2): 229-252.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. Radecki W., 2012. Utrzymanie czystości i porządku w gminach. Komentarz (Keeping cleanliness and order in municipalities. A commentary). Wolters Kluwer Polska, Warszawa.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Rayle L., Zegras C., 2012. The emergence of inter-municipal collaboration: Evidence from metropolitan planning in Portugal. European Planning Studies 21(6): 867-889.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. Rija M., Tenuta P., 2011. Forms of association of Italian municipalities: Empirical evidence. Global Journal of Business Research 5(2): 85-96.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Rodríguez-Pose A., Krøijer A., 2009. Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in Central and Eastern Europe. Growth and Change 40(3): 387-417.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  48. Sorrentino M., Simonetta M., 2013. Incentivising inter-municipal collaboration: the Lombard experience. Journal of Management & Governance 17(4): 887-906.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  49. Sørensen E., Torfing j., 2007. Introduction: Governance network research: Towards a second generation. In: Sørensen E., Torfing j. (eds), Theories of democratic network governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, New York: 1-21.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  50. Sørensen R.J., 2007. Does dispersed public ownership impair efficiency? The case of refuse collection in Norway. Public Administration 85(4): 1045-1058.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  51. Stachowiak K., stryjakiewicz T., 2008. Institutional approach in economic geography and its relevance to regional studies. Quaestiones Geographicae 27/1: 7-20.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Swianiewicz P., 2009. Reformy konsolidacji terytorialnej - teoria i praktyka krajów Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej (Territorial consolidation reforms: The theory and practice of East-Central European countries). Samorząd Terytorialny 4: 5-22.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. Swianiewicz P., 2011. Demanded but difficult: Intermunicipal cooperation in Central and Eastern Europe. In: Swianiewicz P. (ed.), Working together. Intermunicipal cooperation in five Central European countries. Open Society Foundations, Budapest: 1-18.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Swianiewicz P., Herbst M., 2002. Korzyści i niekorzyści skali w działaniach samorządu terytorialnego (Economies and diseconomies of scale in self-government activities). Samorząd Terytorialny 6: 14-24.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. Swianiewicz P., Herbst j., Lackowska M., Mielczarek A., 2008. Szafarze darów europejskich. Kapitał społeczny a realizacja polityki regionalnej w polskich województwach (Dispensers of European gifts. Social capital and the regional policy implemented in Polish voivodeships). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa.
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. Warner M.E., 2006. Inter-municipal cooperation in the U.S.: A regional governance solution? Urban Public Economics Review 7: 132-151.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. Warner M.E., Hefetz A., 2003. rural-urban differences in privatization: Limits to the competitive state. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 21(4): 703-718.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  58. Wassenaar M., Groot T., Gradus R., 2010. Contracting out: An empirical study on motives. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1722547 (accessed 22 january 2014).
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  59. West K., 2007. Inter-municipal co-operation in France: Incentives, instrumentality and empty shells. In: Hulst R., van Montfort A. (eds), Inter-municipal cooperation in Europe. Springer, Dordrecht: 67-90.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  60. Władyka A., 2008. sprawność funkcjonowania jednostek samorządu terytorialnego - studia z zastosowaniem podejścia prakseologicznego (Efficiency of self-government units: A study using a praxeological approach). Samorząd Terytorialny 1-2: 17-27.
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. Współpraca JST w Polsce. Stan i potrzeby ( jsT cooperation in Poland. Current state and needs), 2013. Raport w ramach projektu “Budowanie kompetencji do współpracy międzysamorządowej i międzysektorowej jako narzędzi rozwoju lokalnego i regionalnego”. Związek Miast Polskich, Poznań.
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. Wollmann H., 2010. Comparing two logics of interlocal cooperation: The cases of France and Germany. Urban Affairs Review 46(2): 263-292.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  63. Zafra-Gómez j.L., Prior D., Plata Díaz A.M., López-Hernández A.M., 2013. Reducing costs in times of crisis: Delivery forms in small and medium sized local governments’ waste management services. Public Administration 91(1): 51-68.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  64. Zarycki T., 1997. Nowa przestrzeń społeczno-polityczna Polski (The new socio-political space of Poland). Studia Regionalne i Lokalne 23(56), Uniwersytet Warszawski.
    Search in Google Scholar
  65. Zarycki T., 2004. Kapitał społeczny a trzy polskie drogi do nowoczesności (Social capital and three Polish ways to modernity). Kultura i Społeczeństwo XLVIII, 2: 45-65.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2016-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2081-6383 | Journal ISSN: 2082-2103 (formerly 0137-477X)
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 91 - 104
Submitted on: Mar 10, 2016
Published on: Jun 15, 2016
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
inter-municipal cooperation,
waste management,
Europeanisation,
Poland
Related subjects:
Geosciences,
Geography

© 2016 Bartłomiej Kołsut, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 35 (2016): Issue 2 (June 2016)
Previous article
Next article