References
- Bartczak, M., & Bokus, B. (2013). Rozumienie pojęć w depresji. [Understanding metaphors in depression]. Piaseczno: LEXEM.
- Białecka-Pikul, M. (2003). Metaphors in preschool child thinking about the mind. Psychology of Language and Communication, 7(2), 37-47.
- Black, M. (1979). More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 19-43). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
- Blair, R. J. R. (2005). Responding to the emotions of others: Dissociating forms of empathy through the study of typical and psychiatric populations. Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 698-718. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.06.004
- Chance, Z., Norton, M. I., Gino, F., & Ariely, D. (2011). Temporal view of the costs and benefits of self-deception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 15655-15659. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010658108,(3)
- Chiappe, D. L., Kennedy, J. M., & Chiappe, P. (2003). Aptness is more important than comprehensibility in preference for metaphors and similies. Poetics, 31, 51-68. doi: 10.1016/S0304-422X(03)00003-2
- Chiappe, D. L., Kennedy, J. M., & Smykowski, T. (2003). Reversibility, aptness, and the conventionality of metaphors and similes. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(2), 85-105. doi: 10.1207/S15327868MS1802_2
- Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17, 1082-1089. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01834.x Cushman, F. (2008). Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition, 108, 353-380. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.006
- Dryll, E. M. (2009). Changes in metaphor comprehension in children. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 40(4/2009), 49-57. doi: 10.2478/s10059-009-0015-1
- Dryll, E. M., & Bokus, B. (2016). Zrozumieć metaforę: Studium z psycholingwistki rozwojowej [Understanding metaphors: A study in developmental psycholinguistics]. Piaseczno: LEXEM.
- Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogy and metaphor in learning science. Science Education, 75, 649-672. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730750606
- Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3
- Gentner, D., & Clement, C. A. (1988). Evidence for relational selectivity in the interpretation of analogy and metaphor. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, (pp. 307-358). New York, NY: Academic Press.
- Gibbs R. W. Jr (2001). Evaluating contemporary models of figurative language understanding. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(3&4), 317-333. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2001.9678900
- Gibbs, R. (2002). The poetics of mind. Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
- Glenn, A. L., Iyer, R., Graham, J., Koleva, S., & Haidt, J. (2009). Are all types of morality compromised in psychopathy? Journal of Personality Disorders, 23, 384-398. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2009.23.4.384
- Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding figurative language from metaphors to idioms. Oxford psychology series, number 36. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Glucksberg, S. (2003). The psycholinguistics of metaphor. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 92-96. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00040-2
- Glucksberg, S. (2008). How metaphors create categories - quickly. In R. W. Gibbs Jr (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 67-83). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
- Glucksberg, S., & Haught C. (2006). On the relation between metaphor and simile: when comparison fails. Mind and Language, 21(3), 360-378.
- Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97, 3-18. doi: 10.1037/0033- 295X.97.1.3
- Góralski, A. (1987). Metody opisu i wnioskowania statystycznego dla psychologów i pedagogów [Methods of description and statistical reasoning for psychologists and pedagogues]. Warsaw: PWN
- Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366-385. doi: 10.1037/a0021847
- Gray, K., Young, L., & Waytz, A. (2012). Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychological Inquiry, 23(2), 101-124. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.651387
- Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998-1002. doi: 10.1126/science.1137651
- Kennedy, J. M., & Chiappe, D. L. (1999). What Makes a Metaphor Stronger Than a Simile? Metaphor and Symbol, 14, 63-69.
- Kubicka, D. (2005). Myślenie metaforyczne i jego uwarunkowania u dzieci w wieku od 4 do 10 lat [Make strange familiar and make familiar strange: Metaphoric thinking in children from 4 to 10]. Studia Psychologiczne, 43(2), 59-73.
- Loftus, E. F., & Hoffman, H. G. (1989). Misinformation and memory: The creation of new memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(1), 100-104. doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.1.100
- Loftus, E. F., & Ketcham, K. (1991). Witness for the Defense; The Accused, the Eyewitness, and the Expert Who Puts Memory on Trial. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
- Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1990). Analogical mapping during similarity judgments. In Cognitive Science Society (Ed.). Proceedings of the twelfth annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 38-44), Cambridge, MA: Cognitive Science Society.
- Moran, J. M., Young, L. L., Saxe, R., Lee, S. M., O’Young, D., Mavros, P. L., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2011). Impaired theory of mind for moral judgment in high-functioning autism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 2688-2692. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011734108
- Noveck, I.A., Bianco, M., & Castry, A. (2001). The costs and benefits of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(1&2), 109-121. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2001.9678889
- Ortony, A. (1979). Beyond literal similarity. Psychological Review, 86(3), 161-180. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.86.3.161
- Ortony, A., Vondruska, R. J., Foss, M. A., & Jones, L. (1985). Salience, similes, and the asymmetry of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(5), 569-594. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(85)90047-6
- Pisula, E. (2003). Cognitive and social aspects of communication deficits in children with autism. Psychology of Language and Communication, 7(2), 49-67.
- Rączaszek-Leonardi, J. (2011). Zjednoczeni w mowie: Względność językowa w ujęciu dynamicznym [United in speech: Linguistic relativity in a dynamic perspective]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR.
- Ricoeur, P. (1978). Metaphorical process as cognition, imagination, and feeling. Critical Inquiry, 5(1), 143-159. doi: 10.1086/447977
- Shu, L. L., Gino, F., & Bazerman, M. H. (2011). Dishonest deed, clear conscience: When cheating leads to moral disengagement and motivated forgetting. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 330-349. doi: 10.1177/0146167211398138
- Woolfolk, R. L., Doris, J. M., & Darley, J. M. (2006). Identification, situational constraint, and social cognition: Studies in the attribution of moral responsibility. Cognition, 100, 283-301. doi: 16/j.cognition.2005.05.002
Language: English
Page range: 171 - 191
Published on: Oct 20, 2017
Published by: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Related subjects:
© 2017 Ewa Marta Dryll, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.