Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Metaphorical Association Between Physical and Moral Purity in the Context of One’s Own Transgressions and Immoral Behavior of Others Cover

Metaphorical Association Between Physical and Moral Purity in the Context of One’s Own Transgressions and Immoral Behavior of Others

Open Access
|Oct 2017

References

  1. Bukowski, M. (2008). Zastosowanie paradygmatu decyzji leksykalnych do badania aktywizacji stereotypów [Lexical decision task applications to study stereotype activation]. Psychologia Społeczna, 1, 54-63.
  2. Chapman, H. A., & Anderson, A. K. (2011). Varieties of moral emotional experience. Emotion Review, 3, 255-257. doi:10.1177/1754073911402389
  3. Chapman, H. A., Kim, D. A., Susskind, J. M., & Anderson, A. K. (2009). In bad taste: Evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust. Science, 323, 1222- 1226. doi:10.1126/science.1165565
  4. Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428. doi:10.1037/0033- 295X.82.6.407
  5. David, B., & Olatunji, B. O. (2011). The effect of disgust conditioning and disgust sensitivity on appraisals of moral transgressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1142-1146. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.004
  6. Durkheim, E. (1995). The elementary forms of the religious life. New York, NY: The Free Press (Original work published 1912).
  7. Dziarnowska, W., & Przybysz, P. (2011). Emocje moralne jako podstawa zmysłu moralnego. Defekty zmysłu moralnego [Moral emotions as the basis of moral sensitivity. Defects of moral sensitivity]. Rocznik Kognitywistyczny, 4, 57-64.
  8. Eskine, K. J., Kacinik, N. A., & Prinz, J. J. (2011). A bad taste in the mouth: Gustatory disgust influences moral judgmant. Psychological Science, 22, 295-299. doi:10.1177/0956797611398497
  9. Fayard, J. V., Bassi, A. K., Bernstein, D. M., & Roberts, B. W. (2009). Is cleanliness next to godliness? Disspelling old wives’ tales: Failure to replicate Zhong and Liljenquist (2006). Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis, 6, 21-29.
  10. Frank, R. H. (1988). Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions. New York, NY: Norton & Co.
  11. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.108.4.814
  12. Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852-870). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  13. Haidt, J. (2007, May). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998-1002. doi:10.1126/science.1137651
  14. Huebner, B., Dweyer, S., & Hauser, M. (2008). The role of emotion in moral psychology. Trends in Cognitive Science, 13, 1-6. doi:10.1016/j. tics.2008.09.006
  15. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 4, 195-208. doi:10.1016/S0364- 0213(80)80017-6
  16. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2010). Metafory w naszym życiu [Metaphors we live by.] Warsaw: Aletheia.
  17. Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Dirty hands and dirty mouths: Embodiment of the moral-purity metaphor is specific to the motor modality involved in moral transgression. Psychological Science, 21, 1423-1425. doi:10.1177/0956797610382788
  18. Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2011). Wiping the slate clean: Psychological consequences of physical cleaning. Psychological Science, 20, 307-311. doi:10.1177/0963721411422694
  19. Liljenquist, K. Zhong, C. B., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). The smell of virtue: Clean scents promote reciprocity and charity. Psychological Science, 21, 381-383. doi:10.1177/0956797610361426
  20. Maciuszek, J. (2004). Metafora jako forma komunikacji perswazyjnej [Metaphor as a form of persuasive communication]. In R. Garpiela, & K. Leszczyńska (Eds.), Sztuka perswazji. Socjologiczne, psychologiczne i lingwistyczne aspekty komunikowania perswazyjnego [The art of persuasion. Sociological, psychological, and linguistic aspects of persuasive communication] (pp. 115-130). Kraków: NOMOS.
  21. Maciuszek, J. (2007). Wpływ bezpośrednich i zaprzeczonych dyrektyw na ukierunkowanie uwagi [Influence of direct and negated directives on focusing of attention]. Psychologia Społeczna, 2, 144-163.
  22. Maciuszek, J. (2013). Don’t pay attention to what you see! Negative commands and attention bias. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 44, 70-84. doi:10.2478/ ppb-2013-0008
  23. Parzuchowski, M., Bocian, K., & Baryła, W. (2012). Aktywizacja stereotypu osoby niemoralnej nasila motyw czystości [Activation of a stereotype of an immoral person facilitates the cleanliness motive]. Psychologia Społeczna, 4, 297-305.
  24. Rai, T. S., & Fiske, A. P. (2011). Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review, 118, 57-75. doi:10.1037/a0021867.
  25. Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & McCauley, C. R. (2005). Wstręt [Disgust]. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Psychologia emocji [Psychology of emotion] (pp. 798-819). Gdańsk: GWP.
  26. Sachdeva, S., Iliev, R., & Medin, D. L. (2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners. The paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychological Science, 20, 523-528. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02326.x
  27. Sassenberg, K., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2005). Don’t stereotype, think different! Overcoming automatic stereotype activation by mindset priming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 506-514. doi:10.1016/j. jesp.2004.10.002
  28. Schnall, S., Benton, J., & Harvey, S. (2008). With a clean conscience: Cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. Psychological Science, 19, 1219-1222. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02227.x
  29. Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L., & Jordan, A. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34. doi:1096- 1109. 10.1177/0146167208317771
  30. Sinacka-Kubik, E. (2011). Wpływ wstrętu na uprzedzenia etniczne kobiet i mężczyzn [The influence of disgust on ethnic prejudice of women and men]. Psychologia Społeczna, 1, 24-33.
  31. Smith, D. L. (2011). Najbardziej niebezpieczne ze zwierząt. Natura ludzka i przyczyny wojen [The most dangerous animal: Human nature and the origins of war]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo CiS.
  32. Świątnicki, K., & Przybyszewski, K. (2014). Przypomnienie o śmierci i fizyczne oczyszczenie się a poparcie idei lustracji [The effects of mortality salience and physical cleansing on support for vetting (or lustration)]. Psychologia Społeczna, 3, 298-310. doi:10.7366/1896180020143003
  33. Wojciszke, B. (2014). Psychologia społeczna [ Social psychology]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
  34. Zhong, C. B., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313, 1451-1452. doi:10.1126/ science.1130726
  35. Zhong, C. B., Strejcek, B., & Sivanthan, N. (2010). A clean self harsh moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 859-862. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.003
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/plc-2017-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Language: English
Page range: 152 - 170
Published on: Oct 18, 2017
Published by: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2017 Martyna Sekulak, Józef Maciuszek, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.