Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Zing Zing Bang Bang: How Do You Know What She Really Meant. Gender Bias in Response to Irony: The Role of Who is Speaking to Whom Cover

Zing Zing Bang Bang: How Do You Know What She Really Meant. Gender Bias in Response to Irony: The Role of Who is Speaking to Whom

Open Access
|Feb 2017

References

  1. Abele, A.E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (4), 768–776.10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.768
  2. Anolli, L., Ciceri, R., & Infantino, M.G. (2002). From “blame by praise” to “praise by blame”: Analysis of vocal patterns in ironic communication. International Journal of Psychology, 37 (5), 266–276.10.1080/00207590244000106
  3. Attardo, S. (2002). Humor and irony in interaction: From mode adoption to failure of detection. In L. Anolli, R. Ciceri, & G. Riva (Eds.), Say not to Say: New Perspectives on Miscommunication (pp. 159–179). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  4. Biernat, M. & Manis, M. (2007). Stereotypes and Shifting Standards: Assimilation and Contrast in Social Judgment. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  5. Bromberek-Dyzman, K. (2011). Język emocji a język ironii w pragmatyce eksperymentalnej. Studia z Kognitywistyki i Filozofi i Umysłu, 5 (1), 5–38.
  6. Bromberek-Dyzman, K. (2012). Affective twist in irony processing. Humana. Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies, 23, 83–111.
  7. Brown, P. & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085
  8. Collignon, O., Girard, S., Gosselin, F., Saint-Amour, D., Lepore, F., & Lassonde, M. (2010). Women process multisensory emotion expressions more efficiently than men. Neuropsychologia, 48 (1), 220–225.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.007
  9. Colston, H.L. & Lee, S.Y. (2004). Gender differences in verbal irony use. Metaphor and Symbol, 19 (4), 289–306.10.1207/s15327868ms1904_3
  10. Colston, H.L. & O’Brien, J.E. (2000). Contrast of kind versus contrast of magnitude: The pragmatic accomplishments of irony and hyperbole. Discourse Processes, 30 (2), 179–199.10.1207/S15326950DP3002_05
  11. Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25 (3), 349–367.10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3
  12. Cutler, A. (1974). On saying what you mean without meaning what you say. In M.W. Fox, R.A. Bruck, & A. La Galy (Eds.), Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 17–127). Chicago: CLS.
  13. Dews, S., Kaplan, J., & Winner, E. (1995). Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony. Discourse Processes, 19 (3), 347–367.10.1080/01638539509544922
  14. Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11 (2), 77–83.10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
  15. Freud, S. (1927). The Future of an Illusion. London, UK: Hogarth Press.
  16. Gibbs, R.W. (2000). Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol, 15 (1-2), 5–27.10.1080/10926488.2000.9678862
  17. Gibbs, R.W. & O’Brien, J. (1991). Psychological aspects of irony understanding. Journal of Pragmatics, 16 (6), 523–530.10.1016/0378-2166(91)90101-3
  18. Gross, J.J., & Levenson, R.W. (1995). Emotion elicitation using films. Cognition & Emotion, 9 (1), 87–108.10.1080/02699939508408966
  19. Guimond, S., Chatard, A., Martinot, D., Crisp, R.J., & Redersdorff, S. (2006). Social comparison, self-stereotyping, and gender differences in self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90 (2), 221–242.10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.221
  20. Hall, J.A. (1984). Nonverbal Sex Differences: Communication Accuracy and Expressive Style. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.10.56021/9780801824401
  21. Holtgraves, T. (1991). Interpreting questions and replies: Effects of face-threat, question form, and gender. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54 (1), 15–24.10.2307/2786785
  22. Isen, A.M. & Shalker, T.E. (1982). The influence of mood state on evaluation of positive, neutral, and negative stimuli: When you “accentuate the positive,” do you “eliminate the negative”? Social Psychology Quarterly, 4, 58–63.10.2307/3033676
  23. Jorgensen, J. (1996). The functions of sarcastic irony in speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 26 (5), 613–634.10.1016/0378-2166(95)00067-4
  24. Kałowski, P. (2015). Gender of the speaker and the addressee of an ironic utterance and irony comprehension. (Unpublished seminar thesis). University of Warsaw.
  25. Kałowski, P. (2016). The effect of gender on irony understanding. Master’s thesis in preparation. University of Warsaw.
  26. Katz, A., Piasecka, I., & Toplak, M. (November 2001). Comprehending the sarcastic comments of males and females. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Orlando, FL.10.1037/e537102012-525
  27. Kotthoff, H. (2003). Responding to irony in different contexts: On cognition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 35 (9), 1387–1411.10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00182-0
  28. Kreuz, R.J. & Roberts, R.M. (1995). Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor and Symbol, 10 (1), 21–31.10.1207/s15327868ms1001_3
  29. Lakoff, R.T. (1973). The logic of politeness; or minding your p’s and q’s. In C. Corum, T.C. Smith Stark, & A. Weiser (Eds.), Papers from the 9th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 292–305). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  30. Longman, D.L. & Graesser, A.C. (1988). Wit and humor in discourse processing. Discourse Processes, 11 (1), 35–60.
  31. Mead, M. (2001). Sex and Temperament: In Three Primitive Societies. New York, NY: Harper Perennial. (Original work published 1935)
  32. Milanowicz, A. (2016). Irony processing task (Unpublished questionnaire from doctoral thesis). University of Warsaw.
  33. Milanowicz, A. (2013). Irony as a means of perception through communication channels. Emotions, attitude and IQ related to irony across gender. Psychology of Language and Communication, 17 (2), 115–132.
  34. Milanowicz, A. & Bokus, B. (2013). Gender and moral judgments: The role of who is speaking to whom. Journal of Gender Studies, 22 (4), 423–443.10.1080/09589236.2012.719314
  35. Moskowitz, G.B. (2005). Social Cognition: Understanding Self and Others. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  36. Soleymani, M., Pantic, M., & Pun, T. (2012). Multimodal emotion recognition in response to videos. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 3 (2), 211–223.10.1109/T-AFFC.2011.37
  37. Teasdale, J.D. & Fogarty, S.J. (1979). Differential effects of induced mood on retrieval of pleasant and unpleasant events from episodic memory. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88 (3), 248–257.10.1037/0021-843X.88.3.248
  38. Todorov, A., Said, C.P., Engell, A.D., & Oosterhof, N.N. (2008). Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12 (12), 455–460.10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.001
  39. Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
  40. Weitzman, L.J. (1979). Sex Role Socialization. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield
  41. Wigboldus, D. & Douglas, K.M. (2007). Language, stereotypes, and intergroup relations. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social Communication (pp. 79–106). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  42. Wojciszke, B. (2010). Sprawczość i wspólnotowość: podstawowe wymiary spostrzegania społecznego. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
  43. Wojciszke, B., Szlendak, M.A. (2010). Skale do pomiaru orientacji sprawczej i wspólnotowej. Psychologia Społeczna, 5 (1), 57–70.
  44. Wu, D., Courtney, C.G., Lance, B.J., Narayanan, S.S., Dawson, M.E., Oie, K.S., & Parsons, T.D. (2010). Optimal arousal identification and classification for affective computing using physiological signals: virtual reality Stroop task. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 1 (2), 109–118.10.1109/T-AFFC.2010.12
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/plc-2016-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Language: English
Page range: 219 - 234
Published on: Feb 23, 2017
Published by: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2017 Anna Milanowicz, Piotr Kałowski, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.