Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An Experimental Approach to Basic Word Order in Turkish Intransitives Cover

An Experimental Approach to Basic Word Order in Turkish Intransitives

By: Engin Arik  
Open Access
|Oct 2016

References

  1. Aksu-Koç, A.A. (1994). Development of linguistic forms: Turkish. In R.A. Berman & D.I. Slobin (Eds.), Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic and Developmental Study (pp. 329-392). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  2. Aksu-Koç, A.A. & Slobin, D.I. (1985). Acqusition of Turkish. In D.I. Slobin (Ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acqusition. Vol. 1: The Data (pp. 839-878). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  3. Comrie, B. (1989). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  4. Dahl, Ö. (2008). Animacy and egophoricity: Grammar, ontology and phylogeny. Lingua, 118 (2), 141-150.10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.008
  5. Dahl, Ö. & Fraufud, K. (1996). Animacy in grammar and discourse. In T. Fretheim & J.K. Gundel (Eds.), Reference and Referent Accessibility (pp. 47-66). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
  6. Dryer, M.S. (1991). SVO Languages and the OV/VO Typology. Journal of Linguistics, 27 (2), 443-482.10.1017/S0022226700012743
  7. Dryer, M.S. (1992). The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language, 68 (1), 81-138.
  8. Dryer, M.S. (2005). Order of subject, object, and verb. In M. Haspelmath, M.S.
  9. Dryer, D. Gil, & B. Comrie (Eds.), The World Qtlas of Language Structures (pp. 330-333). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  10. Dryer, M.S. (2013). Against the six-way order typology, again. Studies in Language, 37 (2), 267-301.10.1075/sl.37.2.02dry
  11. Erguvanli, E.E. (1984). The Function of Word Order in Turkish. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  12. Gell-Mann, M. & Ruhlen, M. (2011). The origin and evolution of word order. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108 (42), 17290-17295.10.1073/pnas.1113716108
  13. Givon, T. (1983). Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Crosslinguistic Study. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.3
  14. Goldin-Meadow, S., So, W., Ozyurek, A., & Mylander, C. (2008). The natural order of events: How speakers of different languages represent events nonverbally. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105 (27), 9163-9168.10.1073/pnas.0710060105
  15. Göksel, A. (2013). Free word order and anchors of the clause. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics, 16, 3-25.
  16. Greenberg, J.H. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J.H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of Grammar (pp. 73-113). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  17. Hawkins, J. A. (2004). Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001
  18. İşsever, S. (2003). Information structure in Turkish: The word order-prosody interface. Lingua, 113 (11), 1025-1053.10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00012-3
  19. Kılıçaslan, Y. (2004). Syntax of information structure in Turkish. Linguistics, 42 (4), 717-765.
  20. Küntay, A. & Slobin, D.I. (2002). Putting interaction back into child language: Examples from Turkish. Psychology of Language and Communication, 6 (1), 5-14.
  21. LaPolla, R.J. & Poa, D. (2006). Describing word order. In F. Ameka, A. Dench, & N. Evans (Eds.), Catching Language: The Standing Challenge of Grammar Writing (pp. 269-295). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  22. Lehmann, W. (1978). English: A characteristic SVO language. In W. Lehmann (Ed.), Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language (pp.169-222). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  23. Leeson, L. & Saeed, J.I. (2012). Word order. In R. Pfau, M. Steinbach, & B. Woll (Eds.), Sign Language: An International Handbook (pp. 245-264). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  24. Newmeyer, F. (2004). Against a parameter-setting approach to typological variation. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 4 (1), 181-234.10.1075/livy.4.06new
  25. Newmeyer, F. (2005). Possible and Probable Languages: A General Perspective on Linguistic Typology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274338.001.0001
  26. Özge, U. & Bozsahin, C. (2010). Intonation in the grammar of Turkish. Lingua, 120 (1), 132-175.10.1016/j.lingua.2009.05.001
  27. Ransom, E.N. (1977). Definiteness, Animacy, and NP Ordering. In E.N. Ransom, Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics (pp. 418-429). Berkeley, CA.10.3765/bls.v3i0.2243
  28. Silverstein, M. (1976). Hierarchy of Features and Ergativity. In R.M.W. Dixon (Ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages (pp. 112-171). Canberra: Australian National University.
  29. Sinnemäki, K. (2010). Word order in zero-marking languages. Studies in Language, 34 (4), 869-912.10.1075/sl.34.4.04sin
  30. Slobin, D.I. (1982). Universal and particular in the acquisition of language. In E. Wanner & L.R. Gleitman (Eds.), Language Acquisition: The State of the Art (pp. 128-172). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  31. Sprouse, J. (2007). A program for experimental syntax: Finding the relationship between acceptability and grammatical knowledge. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
  32. Vennemann, T. (1976). Categorial grammar and the order of meaningful elements. In A. Juilland (Ed.), Linguistic Studies Offered to Joseph Greenberg on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday (pp. 615-634). Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/plc-2016-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Language: English
Page range: 73 - 91
Published on: Oct 27, 2016
Published by: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2016 Engin Arik, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.