Collaborative Relationships Among Couples: Frames of Interaction During Everyday Household Activities
References
- Arcidiacono, F. (2007). Studying the practice of cooperation and collaboration within an international research project on the everyday lives of families. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 41 (2), 139-153.
- Arcidiacono, F. (2010). The ethnographic observation of the everyday life in Italy: Collaborative interactions among working couples. In C.L. Goossens (Ed.), Family Life: Roles, Bonds, and Impact (pp. 99-118). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
- Arcidiacono, F. (2015). Argumentation and reflexivity. In G. Marsico, R. Andrisano- Ruggieri, & S. Salvatore (Eds.), Reflexivity and Psychology (pp. 196-193). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
- Arcidiacono, F., Baucal, A., & Budjevac, N. (2011). Doing qualitative research: The analysis of talk-in-interaction. In A. Baucal, F. Arcidiacono, & N. Budjevac (Eds.), Studying interaction in different contexts: A qualitative view (pp. 17-45). Belgrade: Institute of Psychology.
- Arcidiacono, F., Klein, W., Izquierdo, C., & Bradbury, T.N. (2010). Modalita interattive nella divisione del lavoro domestico: uno studio etnografico su famiglie italiane e statunitensi [Interactional modalities within the division of household labor: An ethnographic study among Italian and US families]. Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata, 10 (1-2), 85-105.
- Arcidiacono, F. & Pontecorvo, C. (2004). Piu metodi per la pluridimensionalita della vita familiare [Diverse methods for a multidimensional study of family life]. Ricerche di Psicologia, 27 (3), 103-118.
- Arcidiacono, F. & Pontecorvo, C. (2010a). Where and how family members spend time at home? A quantitative analysis of the observational tracking on the everyday lives of Italian families. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4 (2), 113-129.
- Arcidiacono, F. & Pontecorvo, C. (2010b). The discursive construction of the fathers’ positioning within family participation frameworks. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25 (4), 449-472.
- Arcidiacono, F., Pontecorvo, C., & Greco Morasso, S. (2009). Family conversations: The relevance of context in evaluating argumentation. Studies in Communication Sciences, 9 (2), 79-92.
- Becker, G.S. (1981). A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Benveniste, E. (1966). Problèmes de linguistique générale [Problems of general linguistics]. Paris: Gallimard.
- Bova, A. & Arcidiacono, F. (2013). Invoking the authority of feelings as a strategic maneuver in family mealtime conversations. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23 (3), 206-224.
- Bova, A. & Arcidiacono, F. (2014). “You must eat the salad because it is nutritious”. Argumentative strategies adopted by parents and children in food-related discussions at mealtimes. Appetite, 73 (1), 81-94.
- Bova, A. & Arcidiacono, F. (2015). Beyond conflicts. Origin and types of issues leading to argumentative discussions during family mealtimes. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3 (2), 263-288.
- Bradbury, T.N. (Ed.) (1998). The Developmental Course of Marital Dysfunction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Bradbury, T.N. & Karney, B.R. (1993). Longitudinal study of marital interaction and dysfunction: Review and analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 13 (1), 15-27.
- Christensen, K. (1988). Women and Home-Based Work: The Unspoken Contract. New York, NY: Holt.
- Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62 (4), 1208-1233.
- Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Etelamaki, M. (2014). On divisions of labor in request and offer environments. In P. Drew & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Requesting in Social Interaction (pp. 115-144). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
- Des Rivieres-Pigeon, C. (2002). Division of domestic work and psychological distress 1 year after childbirth: A comparison between France, Quebec and Italy. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 12 (6), 397-409.
- de Vaus, D. (Ed.) (2009). Family-work balance. Special issue. Journal of Family Studies, 15 (2), 118-187.
- Dunlap, E., Golub, A., & Benoit, E. (2010). The invisible partners: Cohabiting males as ‘caring daddies’ in inner-city ‘mother-only’ households. In C.L. Goossens (Ed.), Family Life: Roles, Bonds, and Impact (pp. 33-54). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
- Emigh, R.J. (2000). The gender division of labour: The case of Tuscan smallholders. Continuity and Change, 15 (1), 117-137.
- Goodnow, J.J. (1988). Children’s household work: Its nature and functions. Psychological Bulletin, 103 (1), 5-26.
- Goodnow, J.J. (1989). Work in households: An overview and three studies. In D. Ironmonger (Ed.), Households Work (pp. 38-58). Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
- Goodnow, J.J. & Delaney, S. (1989). Children’s household work: Task differences, styles of assignment, and links to family relationships. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 10 (2), 209-225.
- Goodwin, C. (2006). Retrospective and prospective orientation in the construction of argumentative moves. Text & Talk, 26 (4-5), 443-461.
- Goodwin, M.H. (2006). Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive/ response sequences. Text & Talk, 26 (4-5), 515-543.
- Hochschild, A. (1997). Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
- Hochschild, A. & Machung, A. (1989). The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. New York, NY: Viking.
- Hollway, W. (1984). Gender difference and the production of subjectivity. In J. Henriques, W. Hollway, C. Urwin, L. Venn, & V. Walkerdine (Eds.), Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity (pp. 227-263). London: Methuen.
- Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G.H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-31). Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.
- Johnson, M.D., Cohan, C.L., Davila, J., Lawrence, E., Rogge, R. D., Karney, B.R., Sullivan, K.T., & Bradbury, T.N. (2005). Problem-solving skills and affective expressions as predictors of change in marital satisfaction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73 (1), 15-27.
- Klein, W., Izquierdo, C., & Bradbury, T.N. (2004). Working relationships: Communicative patterns and strategies among couples in everyday life (Working Paper n. 28). Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center on Everyday Lives of Families.
- Klein, W., Izquierdo, C., Bradbury, T.N., & Arcidiacono, F. (2005). Collaboration and conflict: Insights into the division of household labor among working couples in the United States and Italy (Working Paper n. 36). Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center on Everyday Lives of Families.
- Lerner, G.H. (1995). Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities. Discourse Processes, 19 (1), 111-131.
- Oropeza-Escobar, M. (2011). Framing and collaboration in storytelling events: Forgetfulness, reflexivity and word search. Pragmatics, 21 (2), 213-230.
- Pasch, L.A. & Bradbury, T.N. (1998). Social support, conflict, and the development of marital dysfunction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66 (2), 219-230.
- Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In M.J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversational Analysis (pp. 57-101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Pontecorvo, C. & Arcidiacono, F. (2014). Social interactions in families and schools as contexts for the development of spaces of thinking. In T. Zittoun & A. Iannaccone (Eds.), Activity of Thinking in Social Spaces (pp. 83-97). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
- Riedinger, K. (2012). Family connections: Family conversations in informal learning environments. Childhood Education, 88 (2), 125-127.
- Rigotti, E. & Greco Morasso, S. (2011). Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to other contemporary approaches to argument schemes: The procedural and material components. Argumentation, 24 (4), 489-512.
- Rossi, G. (2012). Bilateral and unilateral requests: The use of imperatives and Mi X? interrogatives in Italian. Discourse Processes, 49 (9), 426-458.
- Salvatore, S. & Valsiner, J. (2009). Idiographic Science on its Way: Towards Making Sense of Psychology. In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner, S. Strout, & J. Clegg (Eds.), Yearbook of Idiographic Science. Volume 2 (pp. 9-19). Rome: Firera & Liuzzo Publishing.
- Schmidt, J. A. (2000). Daily Stressors in Families (Working Paper). Chicago, IL: Sloan Foundation.
- Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Chichester: Wiley- Blackwell.
- Stemplewska-Zakowicz, K., Zalewski, B., Suszek, H., Kobylinska, D., & Szymczyk, B. (2014). The discursive mind model. Psychology of Language and Communication, 18 (1), 1-21.
- Wong, J. (2000). Repetition in conversation: A look at “first and second sayings”. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33 (4), 407-424.
- Zinken, J. & Borek, A. (2012). Working side by side? Interaction and interview data in research on household conflicts. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 9 (2), 99-113.
Language: English
Page range: 23 - 47
Published on: Oct 27, 2016
Published by: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2016 Francesco Arcidiacono, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.