Disrupt-Then-Reframe is in the Air: A French Replication and Refinement
References
- Aaker, J.L. (2000). Accessibility or diagnosticity? Disentangling the infl uence of culture on persuasion processes and att itudes. Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (4), 340-357.
- Aaker, J.L. & Williams, P. (1998). Empathy versus pride: Th e infl uence of emotional appeals across cultures. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 241-261.
- Carpenter, C.J. & Boster, F.J. (2009). Meta-analysis of the eff ectiveness of the disrupt-then-reframe compliance gaining technique. Communication Reports, 22 (2), 55-62.
- Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 (5), 752-766.
- Cialdini, R., Wosinska, W., Barrett , D., Butner, J., & Gornik-Durose, M. (1999). Compliance with a request in two cultures: Th e differential influence of social proof and commitment/consistency on collectivists and individualists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25 (10), 1242-1253.
- Courbet, D. & Marchioli, A. (in press). Risques et communication de sante publique en contexte mediterraneen. Deux experimentations en region PACA. In F. Bernard & M. Durampart (Eds.), Savoirs en action, cultures et réseaux méditerranéens. Paris: CNRS editions.
- Davis, B.P. & Knowles, E.S. (1999). A disrupt-then-reframe technique of social infl uence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76 (2), 192-199.
- Dolinski, D. & Szczucka, K. (2012). Fear-then-relief-then argument: How to sell goods using the EDTR technique of social infl uence. Social Infl uence, 7 (3), 251-267.
- Dolinski, D. & Szczucka, K. (2013). Emotional disrupt-then-reframe technique of social infl uence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43 (10), 2031-2041.
- Fayol, M. & Monteil, J.-M. (1988). Th e notion of script: From general to developmental and social psychology. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 8 (4), 335-361.
- Fennis, B.M., Das, E.H.H.J., & Pruyn, A.T.H. (2004). “If you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffl e them with nonsense”: Extending the impact of the disruptthen- reframe technique of social infl uence. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14 (3), 280-290.
- Fennis, B.M., Das, E.H.H.J., & Pruyn, A.T.H. (2006). Interpersonal communication and compliance: The disrupt-then-reframe technique in dyadic infl uence settings. Communication Research, 33 (2), 136-151.
- Freedman, J.L. & Fraser, S.C. (1966). Compliance without pressure: Th e foot-inthe- door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4 (2), 196-202.
- Guéguen, N. & Pascual, A. (2000). Evocation of freedom and compliance: Th e “but you are free of… ” technique. Current Research in Social Psychology, 5 (18), 264-270.
- Han, S. & Shavitt , S. (1994). Persuasion and culture: Advertising appeals in individualistic and collectivistic societies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30 (4), 326-350.
- Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International diff erences in work-related values (Abridged). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Howell, D.C. (2008). Donnees categorielles et khi-carre. In D.C. Howell (Ed.), Méthodes statistiques en sciences humaines (pp. 139-172). Brussels: DeBoeck.
- Kardes, F.R., Fennis, B.M., Hirt, E.R., Tormala, Z.L., & Bullington, B. (2007). The role of the need for cognitive closure in the eff ectiveness of the disrupt-thenreframe influence technique. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 377-385.
- Kleinke, C. (1977). Compliance to requests made by gazing and touching experimenters in fi eld sett ings. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13 (3), 218-223.
- Kraut, R.E. (1973). Eff ects of social labelling on giving to charity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9 (6), 551-562.
- Lee, A.Y. & Labroo, A.A. (2004). Th e eff ect of conceptual and perceptual fl uency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 41 (2), 151-165.
- Liberman, N. & Trope, Y. (1998). Th e role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 (1), 5-18.
- Meng, H. (2008). Social script theory and cross-cultural communication. Intercultural Communication Studies, 12 (1), 132-138.
- Mitchell, A. & Valenzuela, A. (2005). How banner ads aff ect brand choice without click-through. In C.P. Haugtveldt, K.A. Machleit, & R.F. Yalch (Eds.), Online consumer psychology: understanding and influencing consumer behaviour in the virtual world (pp. 125-142). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
- Morling, B. & Lamoreaux, M. (2008). Measuring culture outside the head: A metaanalysis of individualism-collectivism in cultural products. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 199-221.
- Pascual, A. & Guéguen, N. (2004). Cultural differences in altruistic behaviour: Quasi-replication of Uranowitz’ foot-in-the-door with implicit demand. Psychological Reports, 94 (3), 767-770.
- Pascual, A., Oteme, C., Samson, L., Wang, Q., Halimi-Falkowicz, S., Souchet, L., Girandola, F., Gueguen, N., & Joule, R.-V. (2012). Cross cultural investigation of compliance without pressure: the “you are free to… ” technique in France, Ivory Coast, Romania, Russia and China. Cross-Cultural Research: Th e Journal of Comparative Social Science, 46 (4), 394-416.
- Petrova, P.K., Cialdini, R.B., & Sills, S.J. (2007). Consistency-based compliance across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43 (1), 104-111.
- Ranney, S. (1992). Learning a new script: An explanation of sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics, 13 (1), 25-50.
- Schank, R.C. & Abelson, R.P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An Inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
- Schwarz, N. & Clore, G.L. (1983). Mood, misatt ribution, and judgements of wellbeing: informative and directive functions of aff ective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 (3), 513-523.
- St Clair, R.N., Th ome-Williams, A.C., & Su, L. (2005). Th e role of social script theory in cognitive blending. Intercultural Communication Studies, 15 (2), 58-76.
- St. Clair, R.N. (2006). Th e framing of culture: Interdisciplinary essays on culture theory. Course available through Blackboard for Beijing Foreign Studies University students, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.
- Trope, Y. & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal Construal. Psychological Review, 110 (3), 403-421. Vallacher, R.R. & Selz, K. (1991). Who’s to blame? Action identification in allocating responsibility for alleged rape. Social Cognition, 9 (2), 194-219.
- Vallacher, R.R., & Wegner, D.M. (1985). A theory of action identifi cation. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
- Vallacher, R.R. & Wegner, D.M. (2012). Action identifi cation theory. In P.A.M.
- Van Lange, A.W. Kruglanski, & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Th eories of Social Psychology (pp. 327-348). Th ousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Wegner, D.M., Vallacher, R.R., Kiersted, G.W., & Dizadji, D. (1986). Action identifi cation in the emergence of social behaviour. Social Cognition, 4 (1), 18-38.
- Wegner, D.M., Vallacher, R.R., Macomber, G., Wood, R., & Arps, K. (1984). Th e emergence of action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 (2), 269-279.
Language: English
Page range: 162 - 173
Published on: Oct 29, 2015
Published by: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2015 Roxane Saint-Bauzel, Audrey Pelt, Laura Barbier, Valérie Fointiat, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.