Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An Analysis Of “The Gymnastics Battle At Stockholm Elementary Schools” Cover

An Analysis Of “The Gymnastics Battle At Stockholm Elementary Schools”

Open Access
|Oct 2015

References

  1. 1. Green A. (2013).. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  2. 2. Baker C. (2005).. London: Sage.
  3. 3. Lindroth J. (2004).. Eslöv: Symposion. [in Swedish]
  4. 4. Olsson G. (2003).. Doctoral Thesis, Stockholm University. [in Swedish]
  5. 5. Hammarberg L. (2001).. Doctoral Thesis, Stockholm University. [in Swedish]
  6. 6. Pfister G. (2003). Cultural confrontations: German turnen, Swedish gymnastics and English sport: European diversity in physical activities from a historical perspective.6(1), 62-65.
  7. 7. Lindroth J. (1994). The history of Ling Gymnastics in Sweden: A research survey.29/30, 164-166.
  8. 8. Lindroth J. (1974).. Doctoral Thesis, Uppsala University. [in Swedish]
  9. 9. Ling P.H. (1840).. Uppsala: Palmblad and Comp.[in Swedish]
  10. 10. Lundquist Wanneberg P. (2004).. Doctoral Thesis, Stockholm University. [in Swedish]
  11. 11. Falk E. (1913).. Stockholm: Palmquist. [in Swedish]
  12. 12. Heywood C. (2001).. Cambridge: Polity.
  13. 13. Shanahan S. (2007). Lost and found: The sociological ambivalence toward childhood.33, 407-428.
  14. 14. van Drenth A., Myers K. (2011). Normalising childhood: Policies and interventions concerning special children in the United States and Europe (1900-1960).47(6), 719-727.
  15. 15. Hendrick H. (2003). Constructions and reconstructions of British childhood: An interpretative survey, 1800 to the present. In A. James, A. Proust (eds),(pp. 35-40). London: Routledge Falmer.
  16. 16. Platt B. (2005). Japanese childhood, modern childhood: The nation-state, the school, and 19th-century globalization.38(4), 965-985.
  17. 17. Woolfolk A. (2004).. Boston: Pearson A and B.
  18. 18. Lawton D., Gordon P. (2002).. London & Portland: Woburn Press.
  19. 19. Zhao G. (2011). The modern construction of childhood: What does it do to the paradox of modernity?30, 241-256.
  20. 20. Zhao G. (2007). The making of the modern subject: A cross-cultural analysis.57(1), 75-88.
  21. 21. Stockholmstidningen, 26 February 1912.. [in Swedish]
  22. 22. Widerström K. (1922). Reform efforts in the Swedish Gymnastics., 1-4. [in Swedish]
  23. 23. Dagens Nyheter, 19 March 1912.. [in Swedish]
  24. 24. von Bahr L. (1912). A protest against Elin Falks proposel about new gymnastics for Stockholm Elementary Schools., 397-412. [in Swedish]
  25. 25. Falk E. (1920).. Stockholm: Hedberg & Björklund. [in Swedish]
  26. 26. Stockholmstidningen, 4 October 1922.. [in Swedish]
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pjst-2015-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2082-8799 | Journal ISSN: 1899-1998
Language: English
Page range: 106 - 113
Submitted on: Nov 26, 2014
Accepted on: May 28, 2015
Published on: Oct 29, 2015
Published by: University of Physical Education in Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2015 Pia Lundquist Wanneberg, published by University of Physical Education in Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.