Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Everyday Physical Education: Functional and Dysfunctional Consequences in Hungarian Public Education Cover

Everyday Physical Education: Functional and Dysfunctional Consequences in Hungarian Public Education

By: Ảgnes Vamos and  Tamas Doczi  
Open Access
|Nov 2015

References

  1. Christodoulou, D. (2011).The Status of Physical Education in Cypriot Schools. Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research, 50, 110-117. DOI: 10.2478/v10141-010-0028-710.2478/v10141-010-0028-7
  2. Elbert, G. (2010a). Az iskolai testnevelés helyzetének és szerepének változása az 1990-es rendszerváltás után Magyarországon. Changes in the Situation and Role of School Physical Education After the 1990 Transition in Hungary. PhD thesis.Budapest: Semmelweis University.
  3. Elbert, G. (2010b). The Effect of the Amendments of the Public Education Act on the School Activity of the Physical Education Teachers. Physical Cultureand Sport Studies and Research, 46, 123-129. DOI: 10.2478/v10141-009-0010-410.2478/v10141-009-0010-4
  4. European Commission (2007). White paper on sport. Brussels, 11 July 2007.
  5. European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice (2013). Physical Education and Sportat School in Europe. Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  6. European Union (2008). EU Physical Activity Guidelines. Brussels, 10 December 2008.
  7. Green, K., Hardman, K. (2005). Physical Education: Essential Issues. London:Sage Publications.
  8. Hamar P., Peters D.M., Van Berlo, K., Hardman, K. (2006). Physical education and sport in Hungarian schools after the political transition of the 1990s. Kinesiology, 38, 86-93.
  9. Hamar, P. (2012). MindenNATos testnevelés (Daily PE classes). Új Pedagógiai Szemle, 62(11-12), 87-97.
  10. Hardman, K., Marshall, J. (1999).Worldwide Survey of the State and Status of School Physical Education: Summary of Findings. ICSSPE.
  11. Hardman, K. (2004). Physical Education in Schools: A Global Perspective. Kinesiology, 40, 5-28.
  12. Merton, R.K. (1949). Social Theory and Social Structure (pp. 73-139). New York: Free Press.
  13. National Physical Education Congress (1930). Decision of the National Physical Education Congress. Testnevelés, 12(3), 924.
  14. Pühse, U., Gerber, M. (2004). International Comparison of Physical Education: Concepts, Problems, Prospects. Aachen: Meyer und Meyer Verlag.
  15. UNESCO (2012). Empowering Girls and Women Through Physical Education and Sport: Advocacy Brief. Bangkok: UNESCO.
  16. UNESCO (2013).World-Wide Survey of School Physical Education: FinalReport.Paris:United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
  17. WHO (2008). School Policy Framework: Implementation of the WHO Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pcssr-2015-0020 | Journal eISSN: 1899-4849 | Journal ISSN: 2081-2221
Language: English
Page range: 20 - 30
Submitted on: Aug 18, 2015
|
Accepted on: Oct 1, 2015
|
Published on: Nov 26, 2015
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2015 Ảgnes Vamos, Tamas Doczi, published by Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.