References
- Adlakha, V. G. (1989). A classified bibliography of research on stochastic PERT networks: 1966–1987. Information Systems and Operational Research, 27(3), pp. 272–296.
- Clark, C. E. (1961). The greatest of a finite set of random variables. Operations Research, 9, pp. 145–162.
- Clark, C. E. (1962). The PERT model for the distribution of an activity time. Operations Research, 10, pp. 405–406.
- Crandall, K., & Hajdu, M. (1994). A CPM költségtervezési feladat “legrosszabb” megoldása. Közlekedéstudományi szemle, 44(5), pp. 173–176. (In Hungrian).
- Dantzig, G. B. (1963). Linear Programming and Extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
- de Leon, G. P. (2008). Graphical Planning method. In: PMICOS Annual Conference, Chicago, IL.
- Dinic, E. A. (1990). The fastest algorithm for the PERT problem with AND- and OR-nodes (the new product-new technology problem). In: Kannan, R., & Pulleyblank, W. R. (eds.). Proceedings of the International Conference on Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization. University of Waterloo Press, Waterloo, ON, Canada, pp. 185–187.
- Dodin, B. M. (1985a). Bounding the project completion time distribution in PERT networks. Operations Research, 33, pp. 862–881.
- Dodin, B. M. (1985b). Approximating the distribution functions in stochastic networks. Computers & Operations Research, 12(3), pp. 251–264.
- Elmaghraby, S. E. (1989). The estimation of some network parameters in PERT model of activity networks: Review and critique. In: Slowinski, R., & Weglarz J. (eds.). Advances in Project Scheduling. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 371–432.
- Farnum, N. R., & Stanton, L. W. (1987). Some results concerning the estimation of beta distribution parameters in PERT. Journal of the Operations Research Society, 38, pp. 287–290.
- Fondahl, J. W. (1961). A Non-Computer Approach to the Critical Path Method for the Construction Industry, Technical Report #9. Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
- Fondahl, J. W. (1987). The history of modern project management: Precedence diagramming method: Origins and early developments. Project Management Journal, 18(2), pp. 33–36.
- Francis, A., & Miresco, E. T. (2000). Decision support for project management using a chronographic approach. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Decision Making in Urban and Civil Engineering Grand Hôtel Mercure Saxe-Lafayette, 20–22 November 2000, Lyon, France, pp. 845–856. Published jointly by INSA-Lyon, ESIGEC Chambery, ENTPE-Lyon and ETS Canada. [ISBN 2868341179].
- Francis, A., & Miresco, E. T. (2002). Decision support for project management using a chronographic approach. Journal of Decision Systems, 11(3–4), pp. 383–404.
- Fulkerson, D. R. (1961). A network flow computation for project cost curves. Management Science, 7(2), pp. 167–178.
- Gillies, D. W. (1993). Algorithms to schedule tasks with AND/OR precedence constraints. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
- Hahn, E. D. (2008). Mixture densities for project management activity times: A robust approach to PERT. European Journal of Operational Research, 188, pp. 450–459.
- Hajdu, M. (1993). An algorithm for solving the cost optimization problem in precedence diagramming. Periodica Politechnica Civil Engineering, 37(3), pp. 231–247.
- Hajdu, M. (1997). Network Scheduling Techniques for Construction Project Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, London, New York. 352 p. [ISBN:0-7923-4309-3].
- Hajdu, M. (2013). Effects of the application of activity calendars in PERT networks. Automation in Construction, 35, pp. 397–404.
- Hajdu, M. (2015a). One relation to rule them all: The point-to-point precedence relation that substitutes the existing ones. In: Froese, T. M., Newton, L., Sadeghpour, F., & Vanier, D. J. (eds.). Proceedings of ICSC15: The Canadian Society for Civil Engineering 5th International/11th Construction Specialty Conference. 7–10 June. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. doi: 10.14288/1.0076408.
- Hajdu, M. (2015b). History and some latest development of precedence diagramming method. Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: An International Journal, 7(2), pp. 1302–1314. doi: 10.5592/otmcj.2015.2.5.
- Hajdu, M. (2015c). Continuous precedence relations for better modelling overlapping activities. Procedia Engineering, 123, pp. 216–223. doi: 1016/j.proeng.2015.10.080.
- Hajdu, M. (2015d). Precedence diagramming method: Some latest developments. In: Keynote Presentation on the Creative Construction Conference, 21–24 June, 2015. Krakow, Poland.
- Hajdu, M. (2016a). Sixty years of project planning: History and future. In: Conference Proceedings of People, Buildings and Environment 2016, An International Scientific Conference, Luhačovice, Czech Republic, pp. 230–242. Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Brno, Czech Republic [ISSN: 1805-6784].
- Hajdu, M. (2016b). PDM time analysis with continuous and point-to-point relations: Calculations using an artificial example. Procedia Engineering, 164, pp. 57–67. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.592.
- Hindealng, T. J., & Muth, J. F. (1979). A dynamic programming algorithm for decision CPM networks. Operations Research, 27(2), pp. 225–241.
- IBM. (1964). Users’ Manual for IBM 1440 Project Control System (PCS).
- Johnson, D. (1997). The triangular distribution as a proxy for the beta distribution in risk analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 46, pp. 387–398. doi: 10.1111/1467-9884.00091.
- Kamburowski, J. (1992). Bounding the distribution of project duration in PERT networks. Operations Research Letters, 12(1), pp. 17–22.
- Kamburowski, J. (1997). New validations of PERT times. Omega, 25(3), pp. 323–328.
- Keefer, D. L., & Bodily, S. E. (1983). Three-point approximations for continuous random variables. Management Science, 29(5), pp. 595–609.
- Kelley, J. E. (1961). Critical path planning and scheduling: Mathematical basis. Operations Research, 9(3), pp. 296–320.
- Kelley, J. E. (1989). The origins of CPM: A personal history. PM Network, III(2) PMI: USA.
- Kelley, J. E., & Walker, M. E. (1959). Critical path planning and scheduling. In: Proceedings of the Eastern Joint Computer Conference, 1–3 December 1959 Boston, MA, pp. 160–173.
- Kim, S. (2010). Advanced Networking Technique. Kimoondang, South Korea.
- Kim, S. (2012). CPM schedule summarizing function of the beeline diagramming method. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 11(2), pp. 367–374.
- Klafszky, E. (1969). Hálózati folyamok (Network Flows). Bolyai Jáns Mathematical Society Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.
- Kotiah, T. C. T., & Wallace, N. D. (1973). Another look at the PERT asssumptions. Management Science, 20(3–4), pp. 44–49.
- Krishnamoorty, M. S., & Deon, N. (1979). Complexity of minimum-dummy-activities problem in a PERT Network. Networks, 9. pp. 189–194.
- Lucko, G. (2009). Productivity Scheduling Method: Linear schedule analysis with singularity functions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(4), pp. 246–253.
- Malcolm, D. G., Roseboom, J. H., Clark, C. E., & Fazar W. (1959). Application of a technique for a research and development program evaluation. Operations Research, 7, pp. 646–669.
- Malyusz, L., & Hajdu, M. (2009). How would you like it? Shorter or cheaper? Organization Technology and Management in Construction, 1(2), pp. 59–63.
- Massay, R. S. (1963). Program evaluation review technique: Its origins and development. Master's thesis, The American University, Washington, DC.
- Meyer, W. L., & Shaffer, L. R. (1963). Extension of the Critical Path Method Through the Application of Integer Programming, Technical Report. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
- Mohan, S., Gopalakrishnan, M., Balasubramanian, H., & Chandrashekar, A. (2007). A lognormal approximation of activity duration in PERT using two time estimates. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58, pp. 827–831.
- Möhring, R. H., Skutella, M., & Stork, F. (2004). Scheduling with and/or precedence constraints. SIAM Journal on Computing, 33(2), pp. 393–415.
- Plotnick, FL. (2004). Introduction to modified sequence logic. In: Conference Proceedings, PMICOS Conference, April 25, 2004, Montreal, QC.
- Premachandra, I. M., & Gonzales, L. (1996). A simulation model solved the problem of scheduling drilling rigs at Clyde dam. Interfaces, 26(2), pp. 80–91.
- Roy, G. B. (1959), Théorie des Graphes: Contribution de la théorie des graphes á l1 étude de certains problémes linéaries. In: Comptes rendus des Séances de l1 Acedémie des Sciences. séence du Avril, Gauthier-Villars, 1959, pp. 2437–2449.
- Roy, G. B. (1960), Contribution de la théorie des graphes à l’étude de certains problems d’ordonnancement. In: Comptes rendus de la 2ème conférence internationale sur la recherché opérationnelle, Aix-en-Provence. English Universities Press, Londres, pp. 171–185.
- Sasieni, M. W. (1986). A note on PERT times. Management Science, 32, pp. 405–406.
- Schwindt, C., & Zimmermann, J. (2015). Handbook on Project Management and Scheduling. Springer, Switzerland (ISBN 978-3-319-05442-1).
- Siemens, N. (1971). A simple time-cost trade-off algorithm. Management Science, 17(6), pp. 354–363.
- Trietsch, D., Mazmanyan, L., Gevorgyan, L., & Baker, K. R. (2012). Modeling activity times by the Parkinson distribution with a lognormal core: Theory and validation. European Journal of Operations Research, 216(2), pp. 386–396.
- Van Slyke, R. M. (1963). Monte Carlo methods and the PERT problem. Operational Research, 11, pp. 839–861.
- Vanhoucke, M., & Coelho, J. (2016). An approach using SAT solvers for the RCPSP with logical constraints. European Journal of Operations Research, 249(2), pp. 577–591.
- Yao, M., & Chu, W. (2007). A new approximation algorithm for obtaining the probability distribution function for project completion time. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 54, pp. 282–295.