Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Are We as Attentive to Method as We Should Be? Cover

Are We as Attentive to Method as We Should Be?

Open Access
|Feb 2017

References

  1. Burr, V. (1995) An Introduction to Social Constructionism. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203299968
  2. Fetveit, A. (2000) Den trojanske hest: Om metodebegrepets marginalisering av humanistisk medieforskning [The Trojan horse: On the marginalization of method in research in the Humanities]. Norsk Medietidskrift, 2: 5-27.10.18261/ISSN0805-9535-2000-02-02
  3. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and M. Trow (1994) The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
  4. Lazarsfeld, Paul F. (1941) Administrative and Critical Communication Research. In Lazarsfeld (ed.) Qualitative Analysis. Historical and Critical Essays. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc. 1972, Ch. 6.
  5. Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and M. Gibbons (2001). Re-Thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0222 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 101 - 106
Published on: Feb 14, 2017
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2017 Birgitta Höijer, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.