References
- Benoit, W.L. (2007) Communication in Political Campaigns. New York: Peter Lang.
- Benoit, W.L. & Airne, D. (2005) ‘A Functional Analysis of American Vice Presidential Debates’, Argumentation and Advocacy 41: 225-236.
- Benoit, W.L. & Harthcock, A. (1999) ‘Functions of the Great Debates: Acclaims, Attacks, and Defenses in the 1960 Presidential Debates’, Communication Monographs, 66, 341-357.
- Benoit, W.L. & Klyukovski, A.A. (2006) ‘A Functional Analysis of 2004 Ukrainian Presidential Debates’, Argumentation 20: 209-225.
- Benoit, W.L., McHale, J.P., Hansen, G.J., Pier, P.M. & McGuire, J.P. (2003) Campaign 2000. A Functional Analysis of Presidential Campaign Discourse. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Benoit, W.L. & Sheafer, T. (2006) ‘Functional Theory and Political Discourse: Televised Debates in Israel and the United States’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 83(2): 281-297.
- Benoit, W.L., Wen, W.-C., & Yu, T.-H. (2007) ‘A Functional Analysis of 2004 Taiwanese Political Debates’, Asian Journal of Communication 17(1), 24-39.
- Carbaugh, D. (1995) ‘Are Americans Really Superficial?, Notes on Finnish and American Cultures in Linguistic action’, in L. Salo-Lee (ed.) Kieli & kulttuuri oppimisessa ja opettamisessa [Language & culture in learning and teaching], (pp. 53-60). Publications of Department of Communication 12. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
- Gurevitsch, M. & Blumer, J.G. (2004) ‘State of the Art of Comparative Political Communication Research’, in F. Esser & B. Pfetsch (Eds.) Comparing Political Communication. Theories, Cases, and Challenges, (pp. 325-343). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hallin, D.C. & Mancini, P. (2004) ‘Americanization, Globalization, and Secularization’, in F. Esser & B. Pfetsch (Eds.) Comparing Political Communication. Theories, Cases, and Challenges, (pp. 25-44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Herkman, J. (2008) ’Politiikan viihteellistymistä vai professionalisoitumista?’, [Entertainment or professionalization of politics?] Politiikka, 50, 87-99.
- Isotalus, P. (2001) ‘Presidential Campaigning in Finland’, World Communication, 30(2), 5-23.
- Isotalus, P. (2007) ‘Presidentinvaalien 2006 juonenkäänteet ja kampanjan ominaispiirteet’ [Plots and characteristics of campaign in presidential election 2006], in P. Isotalus & S. Borg (Eds.) Presidentinvaalit 2006 [Presidential election 2006], (p.10-31). Helsinki: WSOY.
- Isotalus, P. (2009) ‘Agreement and Disagreement in Focus: A Cultural Perspective on Televised Election debates’, in R. Wilkins & P. Isotalus (Eds.) Speech Culture in Finland, (pp. 191-208). Lanham, LD: University Press of America.
- Isotalus, P. & Aarnio, E. (2005) ‘Medioidun vaalikeskustelun malli’ [A model for mediated election discussion], Puhe ja kieli, 25, 155-170.
- Isotalus, P. & Aarnio, E. (2006) ‘A Model of Televised Election Discussion: The Finnish Multi-party System Perspective’, Javnost-The Public, 13, 61-71.
- Lee, C. & Benoit, W.L. (2005) ‘A Functional Analysis of the 2002 Korea Presidential Debates’, Asian Journal of Communication, 15, 115-132.
- Mancini, P. & Swanson, D.L. (1996) ‘Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy’, in D.L. Swanson & P. Mancini (eds.) Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy, (pp. 1-26). Westport: Praeger.
- McKinney, M.S. & Carlin, D. B. (2004) ‘Political Campaign Debates’, in L.L. Kaid (Ed.) Handbook of Political Communication Research, (pp. 203-234). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Moring, T. (2008) ‘Media and Politics in Finland’, in J. Strömbäck, M. Ørsten & T. Aalberg (Eds.) Communicating Politics. Political Communication in the Nordic Countries, (pp. 45-62). Göteborg: Nordicom.
- Nord, L. (2001) ‘Americanization v. the Middle Way: New Trends in Swedish Political Communication’, Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 6(2), 113-119.
- Pfetsch, B. (2004) ‘From Political Culture to Political Communication Culture’, in F. Esser & B. Pfetsch (Eds.) Comparing Political Communication. Theories, Cases, and Challenges, (pp. 344-366). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Sallinen-Kuparinen, A. (1986) Finnish Communication Reticence. Perceptions and Self-reported Behavior. Studia Philologica Jyväskyläensia 19. University of Jyväskylä
- Tiittula, L., Nuolijärvi, P. & Isotalus, P. (2007) ‘Halosen ja Niinistön esiintymistyylit television vaalikeskusteluissa’ [Communication styles of Halonen and Niinistö in televised election discussions], in P. Isotalus & S. Borg (Eds.) Presidentinvaalit 2006 [Presidential election 2006], (pp. 155-177). Helsinki: WSOY.
- Wilkins, R. (2005) ‘The Optimal Forum: Inadequacies and Excessiveness within the Asiallinen [matter of fact] Nonverbal Style in Public and Civic Settings in Finland’, Journal of Communication, 55, 383-401.
- Wilkins, R. & Isotalus, P. (2009) ‘Finnish Speech Culture’, in R. Wilkins & P. Isotalus (Eds.) Speech Culture in Finland, (p. 1-16). Lanham, LD: University Press of America.
- Wirth, W. & Kolb, S. (2004) ‘Design and Methods of Comparative Political Communication Research’, in F. Esser & B. Pfetsch (Eds.) Comparing Political Communication. Theories, Cases, and Challenges, (pp. 87-111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.