Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Analysis of Barriers in Succession Processes of Family Business with the Use of Grey Incidence Analysis (Polish Perspective) Cover

The Analysis of Barriers in Succession Processes of Family Business with the Use of Grey Incidence Analysis (Polish Perspective)

Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy
Volume 62 (2016): Issue 2 (June 2016)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Jun 2016
References

References

  1. 1. Aldrich, H., & Cliff J. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship, toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 573-596. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. (1992). The client is the expert: A not-knowing approach to therapy. In S. McNamee & K. Gergen (Eds.), Social construction and the therapeutic process. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Arnoff, C. E., McClure, S. L., & Ward, J. L. (2012). Succession in family businesses (Sukcesja w firmach rodzinnych). Kraków: MiP Publishing House.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Astrachan, J. H., & Kolenko, T. A. (1994). A neglected factor explaining family business success: Human resource practices. Family Business Review, 7(3), 251-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1994.00251.x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Astrachan, J. H., & Shanker, M. C. (2003). Family businesses’ contribution to the U.S. economy: A closer look. Family Business Review, 16(3), 211-219.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Barach, J. A., & Ganitsky, J. B. (1995). Successful succession in family business. Family Business Review, 8(2), 131-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1995.00131.x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Barnes, L. B. (1988). Incongruent hierarchies: Daughters and younger sons as company CEOs. Family Business Review, 1, 9-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00009.x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Blake, C. G., & Saleh, D. D. (1995). A model of family owned small business performance. Family Business Annual, 1, 22-30.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Budge, G. S., & Janoff, R. F. (1991). Succession in women-owned family businesses: A case study. Family Business Review, 4(4), 367-381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1991.00367.x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Cadieux, L., Lorrain, J., & Hugron, P. (2002). Succession in women owned family businesses: A case study. Family Business Review, 15, 17-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2002.00017.x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Danco, L. (1975). Beyond survival-A business owner’s guide for success. Cleveland, OH: University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Davis, J. A. (1982). The influence of life stage on father-son relationships in the family firm (Doctoral dissertation). Harvard Business School.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Duh, M. (2003). Family business. Development in strategy management family business (Druzinsko podjetje. Razvoj in razvojni management druzinskego podjetia). MER Evrocenter, Maribor: Publishing House MER.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Duh, M., Belak, J., & Milfelner, B. (2010). Core values, culture and ethical climate as constitutional elements of ethical behaviour: Exploring differences between family and non-family enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 473-489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0519-9
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Dunk, A., Jimenez, P., Sarotar Zizek, S., Milfelner B., & Kallus, W. K. (2015). Similarities and differences of health-promoting leadership and transformational leadership. Our Economy, 61(4), 3-13.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Dyer, G. W. (2006). Examining the “family effect” on firm performance. Family Business Review, 19(4), 253-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00074.x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Dyer, W. G. (2003). The family, the missing variable in organizational research. Entrepreneurship. Theory and Practice, 27(4), 401-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.00018
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Ganitsky, J. A., Carson, J. B., & Doochin, B. A. (1988). Entry of the next generation: Strategic challenge for family business. Journal of Small Business Management, 26, 49-56.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Handler, W. C., & Kram, K. E. (1989). Succession in family firms: The problem of resistance. Family Business Review, 1, 361-381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00361.x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Kedmenec, I., Sebjan, U., & Tomic, P. (2015). Effect of rurality and human capital resources in the entrepreneurial opportunity identification process. Our Economy, 61(2), 35-44.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Kepner, E. (1991). The family and the firm: A coevolutionary perspective. Family Business Review, 4, 445-461. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1991.00445.x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Klien, S. B. (2000). Family businesses in Germany, Significance and structure. Family Business Review, 6, 769-784. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2000.00157.x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Lansberg, I. (1988). The succession conspiracy. Family Business Review, 1, 119-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00119.x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Letonja, M., & Duh, M. (2015). Knowledge transfer in family businesses and its effects on the innovativeness of the next family generation. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, December, 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2015.25
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Litz, R. A. (1995). The family business: Toward definitional clarity. Proceedings of the Academy of Management, 100-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.1995.17536337
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Liu, S., & Yi, L. (2006). Grey information: theory and practical applications. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Mierzwiak, R., & Więcek-Janka, E. (2015). The analysis of successors’ competencies in family enterprises with the use of grey system theory. Grey Systems: Theory and Application, 5(3), 302-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/GS-03-2015-0007
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Sharma, P. (2002, August). Stakeholder mapping technique: Toward the development of a family firm typology. Paper presented at the 62nd meeting of the Academy of Management, Denver, CO.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Swagger, G. (1991). Assessing the successor generation in family businesses. Family Business Review, 4, 397-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1991.00397.x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. 30. Ward, J. L. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. 31. Więcek-Janka, E. (2011). Games and decisions. Poznan: University of Technology Publishing House.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. 32. Więcek-Janka, E. (2013). The guiding value in the management of family businesses (Wiodące wartości w zarządzaniu przedsiębiorstwami rodzinnymi). Poznan: University of Technology Publishing House.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. 33. Więcek-Janka, E., Mierzwiak, R. (2015). The analisis of successors’ competencies in family enterprises with the use of grey system theory. Grey Systems: Theory and Application, 5 ( 3), 302-312.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. 34. Vaillant G.E., (2005), Ego Mechanisms of Defense: A Guide for Clinicans and Researchers, American Psychiatic Press, Inc. Washington.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. 35. Xie, N., & Liu, S. (2009). Research on evaluations of several grey relational models adapt to grey relational axioms. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 20(2), 304-309.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ngoe-2016-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2385-8052 | Journal ISSN: 0547-3101
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 33 - 41
Submitted on: Feb 1, 2016
Accepted on: May 1, 2016
Published on: Jun 24, 2016
Published by: University of Maribor
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Family business,
grey incidence analysis,
grey system theory
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Economic policy,
Business management,
Management, organization, corporate governance,
Mathematics and statistics for economists,
Statistics

© 2016 Ewa Więcek-Janka, Rafał Mierzwiak, Joanna Kijewska, published by University of Maribor
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 62 (2016): Issue 2 (June 2016)
Previous article
Next article