Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Development of a Wearable Sensor System for Dynamically Mapping the Behavior of an Energy Storing and Returning Prosthetic Foot Cover

Development of a Wearable Sensor System for Dynamically Mapping the Behavior of an Energy Storing and Returning Prosthetic Foot

Measurement Science Review
Volume 16 (2016): Issue 3 (June 2016)
By: ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Jun 2016
References

References

  1. [1] Michael, J. (1987). Energy storing feet: A clinical comparison., 11 (3), 154-168.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] Strike, S., Hillery, M. (2000). The design and testing of a composite lower limb prosthesis., 214 (6), 603-614.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. [3] Lehmann, J., Price, R., Boswell-Bessette, S., Dralle, A., Questad, K. (1993). Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet: Seattle Ankle/Lite Foot versus SACH foot., 74, 853-861.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. [4] Lehmann, J., Price, R., Boswell-Bessette, S., Dralle, A., Questad, K., deLateur, B. (1993). Comprehensive analysis of energy storing prosthetic feet: Flex foot and Seattle foot versus standard SACH foot., 74, 1225-1231.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. [5] Noroozi, S., Sewell, P., Rahman, A.G.A., Vinney, J., Zhi Chao, O., Dyer, B. (2013). Modal analysis of composite prosthetic energy-storing-and-returning feet: An initial investigation., 227 (1), 39-48.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. [6] Noroozi, S., Sewell, P., Rahman, A.G.A., Vinney, J., Zhi Chao, O., Dyer, B. (2013). Performance enhancement of bi-lateral lower-limb amputees in the latter phases of running events: An initial investigation., 227 (2), 105-115.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. [7] Vinney, J., Noroozi, S., Rahman, A.G.A., Sewell, P., Zhi Chao, O., Keen Kuan, K., Dupac, M. (2012). Analysis of composite prosthetic energy-storing-and-returning (ESR) feet: A comparison between FEA and the experimental analysis., 15 (3), 19-28.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] Hafner, B. (2005). Clinical prescription and use of prosthetic foot and ankle mechanisms: A review of the literature., 17 (4S), 5-11.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. [9] Buckley, J. (2000). Biomechanical adaptations of transtibial amputee sprinting in athletes using dedicated prostheses., 15 (5), 352-358.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. [10] Wilson, J.R., Asfour, S., Abdelrahman, K.Z., Gailey, R. (2009). A new methodology to measure the running biomechanics of amputees., 33 (3), 218-229.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. [11] De Luigi, A., Cooper, R. (2014) Adaptive sports technology and biomechanics: Prosthetics., 6 (8), S40-S57.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. [12] Raschke, S., Orendurff, M., Mattie, J. et al. (2015). Biomechanical characteristics, patient preference and activity level with different prosthetic feet: A randomized double blind trial with laboratory and community testing., 48, 146-152.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. [13] Hafner, B., Sanders, J., Czerniecki, J., Fergason, J. (2002). Transtibial energy-storage-and-return prosthetic devices: A review of energy concepts and a proposed nomenclature., 39 (1), 1-11.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] Liu, T., Inoue, Y., Shibata, K. (2009). Development of a wearable sensor system for quantitative gait analysis., 42, 978-988.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. [15] Sardini, E., Serpelloni, M., Lancini, M. (2015). Wireless instrumented crutches for force and movement measurements for gait monitoring., 64 (12), 3369-3379.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. [16] Torburn, L., Perry, J., Ayyappa, E., Shanfield, S.L. (1990). Below-knee amputee gain with dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet: A pilot study., 27 (4), 369-384.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. [17] Palermo, E., Rossi, S., Marini, F., Patane, F., Cappa, P. (2014). Experimental evaluation of accuracy and repeatability of a novel body-to-sensor calibration procedure for inertial sensor-based gait analysis., 52, 145-155.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. [18] Hansen, A., Sam, M., Childress, D.S. (2004). The Effective foot length ratio: A potential tool for characterization and evaluation of prosthetic feet., 16 (2), 41-45.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. [19] Hunter, J., Marshall, R., McNair, P. (2005). Relationships between ground reaction force impulse and kinematics of sprint-running acceleration., 21 (1), 31-43.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. [20] Yu, H., Alaqtash, M., Spier, E., Sarkodie-Gyan, T. (2010). Analysis of muscle activity during gait cycle using fuzzy rule-based reasoning., 43, 1106-1114.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. [21] Windolf, M., Götzen, N., Morlock, M. (2008). Systematic accuracy and precision analysis of video motion capturing systems—exemplified on the Vicon-460 system., 4 (12), 2776-2780.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. [22] Cheng, Z., Ligouria, A., Fogleb, R., Webb, T. (2015). Capturing human motion in natural environments., 3, 3828-3835.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. [23] Rebula, J., Ojeda, L., Adamczyk, P., Kuo, A. (2013). Measurement of foot placement and its variability with inertial sensors., 38, 974-980.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. [24] Dyer, B., Sewell, P., Noroozi, S. (2013). How should we assess the mechanical properties of lower-limb prosthesis technology used in elite sport? - An initial investigation., 6, 1-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. [25] Ossur UK Ltd. (2014)...
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. [26] Grabowski, A., McGowan, C., McDermott, W., Beale, M., Kram, R., Herr, H. (2009). Running-specific prostheses limit ground-force during sprinting., 6, 201-204.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. [27] Boquete, L., Ascariz, J.M.R., Cantos, J., Barea, R., Miguel, J.M., Ortega, S., Peixoto, N. (2012). A portable wireless biometric multi-channel system., 45, 1587-1598.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/msr-2016-0021 | Journal eISSN: 1335-8871
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 174 - 182
Submitted on: Feb 1, 2016
Accepted on: May 31, 2016
Published on: Jun 11, 2016
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open
Keywords:
Assistive devices,
biomedical measurements,
displacement measurement,
force measurement,
gait analysis,
prosthetic limbs,
wearable sensors
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Electrical engineering,
Control engineering, metrology and testing

© 2016 James Hawkins, Siamak Noroozi, Mihai Dupac, Philip Sewell, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 16 (2016): Issue 3 (June 2016)
Previous article