Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An Analytical Model for Prediction of Magnetic Flux Leakage from Surface Defects in Ferromagnetic Tubes Cover

An Analytical Model for Prediction of Magnetic Flux Leakage from Surface Defects in Ferromagnetic Tubes

Measurement Science Review
Volume 16 (2016): Issue 1 (February 2016)
By: V. Suresh and  A. Abudhahir  
Open Access
|Feb 2016

References

  1. [1] Lukyanets, S., Snarskii, A., Shamonin, M., Bakaev, V. (2003). Calculation of magnetic leakage field from a surface defect in a linear ferromagnetic material: An analytical approach. NDT & E International, 36, 51-55.10.1016/S0963-8695(02)00071-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] Lijian Yang, Guoguang Zhang, Gang Liu, Songwei Gao. (2008). Effect of lift-off on pipeline magnetic flux leakage inspection. In 17th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing, 25-28 October, 2008, Shanghai, China.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] Snarskii, A.A., Zhenirovskyy, M., Meinert, D., Schulte, M. (2010). An integral equation model for the magnetic flux leakage method. NDT & E International, 43, 343-347.10.1016/j.ndteint.2010.01.008
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. [4] Rao, B.P.C. (2012). Magnetic flux leakage testing: Basics. Journal of Non-Destructive Testing & Evaluation, 11 (3), 7-19.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] Zatsepin, N.N., Shcherbinin, V.E. (1966). Calculation of the magnetostatic field of surface defects. I. Field topography of defect models. Defektoskopiya, 5, 50-59.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. [6] Forster, F. (1986). New findings in the field of non destructive magnetic leakage field inspection. NDT & E International, 19 (1), 3-14.10.1016/0308-9126(86)90134-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] Zhang, Y., Sekine, K., Watanabe, S. (1995). Magnetic leakage field due to sub-surface defects in ferromagnetic specimens. NDT & E International, 28 (2), 67-71.10.1016/0963-8695(94)00004-4
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] Mandache, C., Clapham, L. (2003). A model for magnetic flux leakage signal predictions. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 36, 2437-2421.10.1088/0022-3727/36/20/001
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] Dutta, S.M., Ghorbel, F.H., Stanley, R.K. (2009). Dipole modeling of magnetic flux leakage. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 45 (4), 1959-1965.10.1109/TMAG.2008.2011895
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] Dutta, S.M., Ghorbel, F.H., Stanley, R.K. (2009). Simulation and analysis of 3-D magnetic flux leakage. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 45( 4), 1966-1972.10.1109/TMAG.2008.2011896
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] Mandache, C., Shiari, B., Clapham, L. (2005). Defect separation considerations in magnetic flux leakage inspection. Insight, 47 (5), 269-273.10.1784/insi.47.5.269.65050
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] Conway, J.T. (2006). Trigonometric Integrals for the magnetic field of the coil of rectangular cross section. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 42 (5), 1538-1548.10.1109/TMAG.2006.871084
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/msr-2016-0002 | Journal eISSN: 1335-8871
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 8 - 13
Submitted on: Oct 6, 2015
|
Accepted on: Jan 28, 2016
|
Published on: Feb 19, 2016
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open
Keywords:
Analytical modeling,
elliptic integrals,
surface defect,
dipolar magnetic charge
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Electrical engineering,
Control engineering, metrology and testing

© 2016 V. Suresh, A. Abudhahir, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 16 (2016): Issue 1 (February 2016)Next article