Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Improvement of Simulation Method in Validation of Software of the Coordinate Measuring Systems Cover

Improvement of Simulation Method in Validation of Software of the Coordinate Measuring Systems

Measurement Science Review
Volume 15 (2015): Issue 5 (October 2015)
By: Halina Nieciąg  
Open Access
|Oct 2015

References

  1. [1] Ratajczyk, E. (2005). Coordinate Measuring Technique. Warsaw University of Technology Publisher.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] International Organization for Standardization. (2003). Measurement management systems - Requirements for measurement processes and measuring equipment. ISO 10012:2003.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] International Organization for Standardization. (2002). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS). Coordinate measuring machines (CMM): Acceptance test and reverification tests for coordinate measuring machines (CMM). Part 6: Estimation of errors in computing Gaussian associated features. PN-EN ISO 10360-6.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. [4] International Organization for Standardization. (2002). Software and System Engineering - Software Product Evaluation - Part 1: General overview. ISO/IEC 14598-1.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] Jaworski, J.M., Morawski, R.Z., Olędzki, J.S. (1995). Measuring as the parametric identification of the mathematical model of the object being measured. Metrology and Measurement Systems, 2 (1).
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. [6] IEEE. (1998). IEEE standard for a software quality metrics methodology. IEEE Std. 1061-1998.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. (2008). International vocabulary of metrology - Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM 3rd edition). JCGM 200:2008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] Nieciąg, H. (2012). The assessment of the criterion in tests of acceptance type of the metrological software in coordinate measuring systems. In 10th International Scientific Conference „Coordinate Measuring Technique”, 23-25 April, 2012, Bielsko Biała, Poland.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. (2008). Evaluation of measurement data -- Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. JCGM 100:2008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. (2008). Evaluation of measurement data - Supplement 1 to the „Guide to the expression in measurement” - Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method. JCGM 101:2008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. (2011). Evaluation of measurement data - Supplement 2 to the „Guide to the expression in measurement” - Extension to any number of output quantities. JCGM 102:2011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] International Organization for Standardization. (2008). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) -- Coordinate measuring machines (CMM): Technique for determining the uncertainty of measurement -- Part 4: Evaluating task-specific measurement uncertainty using simulation. ISO/TS 15530-4:2008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. [13] Sładek, J. (2011). The Accuracy of Coordinate Measurements. Cracow University of Technology.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] Nieciąg, H., Tabisz, R.A. (2011). Simulation of influence of systematic and random factors on measurement results of coordinate measuring machines. Measurement Automation and Monitoring, 57 (12), 1611-1616.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. [15] Weckenmann, A., Knauer, M. (1998). The influence of measurement strategy on the uncertainty of CMMmeasurements. Annals of the CIRP, 47 (7), 451-455.10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62872-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. [16] Portman, V., Rubenchik, Y., Shuster, V. (2002). Statistical approach to assessments of geometrical accuracy. Annals of the CIRP, 51 (1), 463-466.10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61561-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. [17] Cox, M.G., Siebert, B.R.L. (2006). The use of a Monte Carlo method for evaluating uncertainty and expanded uncertainty. Metrologia, 43, 178-188.10.1088/0026-1394/43/4/S03
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. [18] McKey, M.D., Conover, W.J. (1979). Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics, 21 (2), 239-24.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. [19] Helton, J.C., Davis, F.J. (2002). Latin Hypercube Sampling and the Propagation of Uncertainty in Analyses of Complex Systems. Sandia Report SAND2001-0417, Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, California.10.2172/806696
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. [20] Stein, M. (1987). Large sample properties of simulations using latin hypercube sampling. Technometrics, 29 (2), 143-151.10.1080/00401706.1987.10488205
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. [21] Owen, A.B. (1998). Latin supercube sampling for very high- dimensional simulations. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, 8 (1), 71-102.10.1145/272991.273010
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. [22] Tabisz, R.A., Nieciąg, H. (2012). Simulation of influence of systematic and random factors on measurement results of coordinate measuring machines. Measurement Automation and Monitoring, 58 (12), 1065-1067.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. [23] Adamczak, S., Janecki, D., Stępień, K. (2011). Testing of methods of measurement and evaluation of the spherical shape errors of machine parts. Mechanic, 12, 958-961.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. [24] Domański, Cz., Pruska, K. (2000). Non-classical Statistical Methods. Polish Economic Publishing House.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. [25] Adamczak, S. (2008). The geometric structure of the surface. Vol. 2. Comparative studies of the instruments. Correlation calculus method. Mechanic, 5-6, 514-518.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. [26] Wikipedia. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spearman%27s_rank_correlation_coefficient.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/msr-2015-0031 | Journal eISSN: 1335-8871
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 226 - 235
Submitted on: Jan 22, 2015
Accepted on: Sep 30, 2015
Published on: Oct 29, 2015
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open
Keywords:
Validation,
coordinate measuring technique,
Monte Carlo simulation
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Electrical engineering,
Control engineering, metrology and testing

© 2015 Halina Nieciąg, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 15 (2015): Issue 5 (October 2015)Next article