Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Different Approaches in Uncertainty Evaluation for Measurement of Complex Surfaces Using Coordinate Measuring Machine Cover

Different Approaches in Uncertainty Evaluation for Measurement of Complex Surfaces Using Coordinate Measuring Machine

Measurement Science Review
Volume 15 (2015): Issue 3 (June 2015)
By: Igor Vrba,  Rudolf Palencar,  Miodrag Hadzistevic,  Branko Strbac,  Vesna Spasic-Jokic and  Janko Hodolic  
Open Access
|Jul 2015

References

  1. [1] International Organization for Standardization. (1998). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Inspection by measurement of workpieces and measuring equipment – Part 1: Decision rules for proving conformance or non-conformance with specifications. ISO 14253-1.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] Trapet, E., Savio, E., De Chiffre, L. (2004). New advances in traceability of CMMs for almost the entire range of industrial dimensional metrology needs. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 53, 433–438.10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60733-1
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] Acko, B., Mccarthy, M., Haertig, F., Buchmeister, B. (2012). Standards for testing freeform measurement capability of optical and tactile coordinate measuring machines. Measurement Science & Technology, 23 (9), 094013.10.1088/0957-0233/23/9/094013
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. [4] Wilhelma, R.G., Hockena, R., Schwenkeb, H. (2001). Task specific uncertainty in coordinate measurement. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 50, 553-563.10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62995-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] International Organization for Standardization. (2004). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Coordinate measuring machines (CMM): Technique for determining the uncertainty of measurement – Part 3: Use of calibrated workpieces or standards. ISO/TS 15530-3.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. [6] International Organization for Standardization. (2008). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Coordinate measuring machines (CMM): Technique for determining the uncertainty of measurement – Part 4: Evaluating task-specific measurement uncertainty using simulation. ISO/TS 15530-4.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] Savio, E., De Chiffre, L. (2003). Validation of calibration procedures for freeform parts on CMMs. In International Topical Conference on Precision Engineering, Micro Technology, Measurement Techniques and Equipment (EUSPEN), 19-20 May 2003, Aachen, Germany, 539-542.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] Savio, E., De Chiffre, L. (2002). An artefact for traceable freeform measurements on coordinate measuring machines. Precision Engineering, 26, 58-68.10.1016/S0141-6359(01)00098-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] Savio, E., Hansen, H.N., De Chiffre, L. (2002). Approaches to the calibration of freeform artefacts on coordinate measuring machines. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 51, 433–436.10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61554-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] Barini, E.M., Tosello, G., De Chiffre, L. (2010). Uncertainty analysis of point-by-point sampling complex surfaces using touch probe CMMs: DOE for complex surfaces verification with CMM. Precision Engineering, 34, 16-19.10.1016/j.precisioneng.2009.06.009
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] Flack, D. (2011). Good Practice Guide No. 42 - CMM Verification. NPL Good Measurement Practice. Teddington, England: National Physical Laboratory.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] Acko, B., Sluban, B., Tasic, T., Brezovnik, S. (2014). Performance metrics for testing statistical calculations in interlaboratory comparisons. Advances in Production Engineering & Management, 9 (1), 44-52.10.14743/apem2014.1.175
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. [13] Crepinsek-Lipus, L., Matus, M., Acko, B. (2013), Optimization of calibrating HeNe laser interferometers by sample-period simulation. International Journal of Simulation Modeling, 12 (3), 154-163.10.2507/IJSIMM12(3)2.231
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] Rodger, G., Flack, D., McCarthy, M. (2007). A Review of Industrial Capabilities to Measure Free-Form Surfaces. NPL Report DEPC – EM 014. Teddington, England: National Physical Laboratory.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. [15] Feautrier, D., Bourdet, P. (1997). Form error assessment: Error separation method for the calibration of free-form surfaces by means of co-ordinate measuring machines. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting- American Society for Precision Engineering. ASPE, 16, 82-85.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. [16] Piratelli-Filho, A., Di Giacomo, B. (2003). CMM uncertainty analysis with factorial design. Precision Engineering, 27, 283–288.10.1016/S0141-6359(03)00035-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. [17] Feng, C.J., Saal, A.L, Salsbury, J.G., Ness, A.R., Lin, G.C.S. (2007) Design and analysis of experiments in CMM measurement uncertainty study. Precision Engineering, 31, 94-101.10.1016/j.precisioneng.2006.03.003
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. [18] Feng, C.X., Wang, X. (2002). Subset selection in predictive modeling of CMM digitization uncertainty. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 21, 419-439.10.1016/S0278-6125(02)80049-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. [19] Sun, A., Anand, S., Tang, J. (2002). Comprehensive design of experiments based framework for optimal CMM inspection and uncertainty analysis of form tolerances. International Journal of Production Research, 40, 2097–2123.10.1080/00207540210128224
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. [20] Peace, S.G. (1993). Taguchi Methods: A Hands-On Approach. Adison-Wesley.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. [21] International Organization for Standardization. (1995). GUM - Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. [22] Vrba, I. (2013) Uncertainty estimation for coordinate measuring machines using for complef surfaces measurement. Unpublished doctorial dissertation. Slovak Technical University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. [23] Tasic, T., Acko, B. (2011). Integration of a laser interferometer and a CMM into a measurement system for measuring internal dimensions. Measurement, 44 (2), 426-433.10.1016/j.measurement.2010.11.002
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/msr-2015-0017 | Journal eISSN: 1335-8871
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 111 - 118
Submitted on: Nov 24, 2014
Accepted on: Jun 23, 2015
Published on: Jul 10, 2015
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open
Keywords:
Coordinate measuring machine,
uncertainty,
complex surfaces,
traceability
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Electrical engineering,
Control engineering, metrology and testing

© 2015 Igor Vrba, Rudolf Palencar, Miodrag Hadzistevic, Branko Strbac, Vesna Spasic-Jokic, Janko Hodolic, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 15 (2015): Issue 3 (June 2015)Next article