Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Key Performance Indicators for the Nato Centres of Excellence Cover

Key Performance Indicators for the Nato Centres of Excellence

Open Access
|Jul 2018

References

  1. [1] Gregory Daddis, No Sure Victory: Measuring U.S. Army Effectiveness and Progress in the Vietnam War, 2011.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199746873.001.0001
  2. [2] CA Technologies, White Paper: Key Performance Indicators: Establishing the Metrics that Guide Success, in https://www.ca.com/content/dam/ca/us/files/white-paper/keyperformance-indicators.pdf, 2015.
  3. [3] CA Technologies, White Paper: Key Performance Indicators: Establishing the Metrics that Guide Success, in https://www.ca.com/content/dam/ca/us/files/white-paper/keyperformance-indicators.pdf, 2015.
  4. [4] Steven Few, Information Dashboard Design: The Effective Visual Communication of Data, O'Reilly, 2006.
  5. [5] https://powerpivotpro.com/2015/05/datazen-beautiful-mobile-dashboards/
  6. [6] http://www.conceptdraw.com/How-To-Guide/performance-indicators
  7. [7] Allied Command Transformation, COE Catalogue 2018, Version: 2018 V1, Graphics Print Jobs: HQ SACT Graphic & Reproduction, p. 33, 2017.
  8. [8] MCM 0236-2003, 04 December 2003.
  9. [9] IMSM-0416-04, NATO Centres of Excellence Accreditation Criteria, 11 June 2004.
  10. [10] Allied Command Transformation, COE Catalogue 2018, Version: 2018 V1, Graphics Print Jobs: HQ SACT Graphic & Reproduction, p. 64, 2017.
  11. [11] Eduard Simion and Alexandru, Kis, New features of the NATO Centres of Excellence in support of the North-Atlantic Alliance Transformation, Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference ”The Knowledge-Based Organization”, pp. 125-131, Sibiu, Romania, 2016.10.1515/kbo-2016-0022
  12. [12] HQ SACT formal letter, Quality Assurance Unconditional Accreditation for Human Intelligence Centre of Excellence, 15 October 2013.
  13. [13] https://e-itep.act.nato.int/Guest/ETOCindex.aspx
  14. [14] Allied Command Transformation, Institutional Accreditation - NATO Quality Assurance, http://www.act.nato.int/qa, 2018.
  15. [15] DRESMARA, Academic Quality Assurance Policy, Edition 1, rev. 3, pp.54-55, in http://www.dresmara.ro/resources/quality.pdf, 2018.
  16. [16] NATO MP COE, Quality Assurance Policy, p. 14, in http://mpcoe.nazwa.pl/images/QA/2016%20NATO%20MPCOE%20QA%20Policy.pdf, 2018.
  17. [17] https://ciedcoe.org/index.php/department-head/quality-assurance-qa
  18. [18] CIMIC COE, The CIMIC COE QA Policy, in https://www.cimic-coe.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/07/20140710_UC_CCOE_QA_Policy_01_Main-document.pdf, 2018.
  19. [19] https://www.iso.org/standard/46486.html ISO 9001:2008
  20. [20] MILMED COE, MILMED COE Policy, pp. 11-12, in http://www.coemed.org/images/stories/policy_documents/MILMED%20COE%20QA%20Policy.pdf, 2016.
  21. [21] MILMED COE, MILMED COE Policy, pp. 18-19, in http://www.coemed.org/images/stories/policy_documents/MILMED%20COE%20QA%20Policy.pdf, 2016.
  22. [22] NATO Stability Policing COE, NATO S&P COE Strategic Plan 2016-2018, edition 1, in http://www.nspcoe.org/docs/default-source/Public/document-library/nato-sp-coestrategic-plan-2016_2018.pdf?sfvrsn=2, 2016.
  23. [23] Douglas H. Walker, Developing Metrics for the Global War on Terrorism, Joint Military Operations Department, Naval War College, Newport, in
  24. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.888.5371&rep=rep1&type=pdf, 2005.
  25. [24] Eduard Simion and Alexandru Kis, New features of the NATO Centres of Excellence in support of the North-Atlantic Alliance Transformation, Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference ”The Knowledge-Based Organization”, pp. 125-131, figure 9, Sibiu, Romania, 2016.10.1515/kbo-2016-0022
  26. [25] NATO, NATO Bi-SC Education and Individual Training Directive 075-007, p. 70, in https://www.act.nato.int/images/stories/structure/jft/ptecs/etd-075-007.pdf, 2015.
  27. [26] NATO, NATO Bi-SC Education and Individual Training Directive 075-007, pp. 65 - 70 & Annex S, in https://www.act.nato.int/images/stories/structure/jft/ptecs/etd-075-007.pdf , 2015.
  28. [27] Cihangir Akşit, Smart standardization: a historical and contemporary success at NATO, NATO Standardization Agency, p. 2, in
  29. https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2014_05/20140528_140528-smart-standardization.pdf, 2014.
  30. [28] Cihangir Akşit, Smart standardization: a historical and contemporary success at NATO, NATO Standardization Agency, p. 3, fig. 1, in
  31. https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2014_05/20140528_140528-smart-standardization.pdf , 2014.
  32. [29] Allied Command Transformation, Leaflet: Shaping Concept Development and Experimentation for the Future. Introduction: NATO Concept Development & Experimentation Defined, in
  33. http://www.act.nato.int/images/stories/events/2014/cde/cde2014ra_1a.pdf , 2014.
  34. [30] Han de Nijs, Concept Development and Experimentation Policy and Process: How Analysis Provides Rigour, HQ Supreme Allied Command Transformation, Capability Engineering Division, Operational Analysis Branch, Norfolk, Virginia, USA, in RTOMP-SAS-081, p. 21-10, www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA584337, 2010.
  35. [31] https://www.scoro.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/KPI-Examples-Download.pdf
  36. [32] Robert D. Austin, Measuring and Managing Performance in Organizations -Paperback, Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, 1996.
Language: English
Page range: 108 - 123
Published on: Jul 26, 2018
Published by: Nicolae Balcescu Land Forces Academy
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2018 Alexandru Kis, Evangelos Theodoridis, published by Nicolae Balcescu Land Forces Academy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.