Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Teacher’s conceptions of quality in dance education expressed through grade conferences Cover

Teacher’s conceptions of quality in dance education expressed through grade conferences

Open Access
|Dec 2016

References

  1. Andersson, N. (2014). Assessing dance: A phenomonological study of formative assessment in dance education. In Formation-Nordic Journal of Art and Research, 3 (1).10.7577/if.v3i1.936
  2. Bengtsson, J. (2001). Sammanflätningar: Husserls och Merleau-Pontys fenomenologi. [Intertwining: Husserl’s and Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology]. (3rd ed.) Göteborg: Daidalos.
  3. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (formerly Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education), 21(1), 5-31.10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
  4. Butler, R. (1988). Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation: The effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58(1), 1-14.10.1111/j.2044-8279.1988.tb00874.x
  5. Camurri, A., Lagerlöf, I., & Volpe, G. (2003). Recognizing emotion from dance movement: Comparison of spectator recognition and automated techniques. International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 59(1), 213-225.10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00050-8
  6. Dochy, F., Segers, M, & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331-350.10.1080/03075079912331379935
  7. Eisner, E. (1998). The Enlightened Eye. Qualitative Inquiry and the Enhancement of Educational Practice. New York: Prentice-Hall. Inc.
  8. Eisner, E. (2007). Assessment and evaluation in education and the arts. In L. Bresler (Ed.), International Handbook of Research in Arts Education, 423-426. Amsterdam: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-3052-9_26
  9. Engel, L. (2004). The somaesthetic dimension of dance art and education - A phenomenological and aesthetic analysis of the problem of creativity in dance. Paper presented at the International Dance Conference, Theatre Academy, Helsinki, Finland.
  10. Ferm Thorgersen, C. (2011). Assessment of musical knowledge from a life-world phenomenological perspective - Challenges of conceptualising and communication. HejMEC, 2, 37-45.
  11. Fraleigh, S. (1987). Dance and the lived body: A descriptive aesthetics. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  12. Gardner, J. (Ed.) (2011). Assessment and learning. SAGE Publications: Los Angeles.
  13. Gibbons, E. (2004). Feedback in the dance studio. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 75(7), 38-43.10.1080/07303084.2004.10607273
  14. Gipps, C. (1999). Socio-cultural aspects of assessment. Review of Research in Education, 24, 355-392.10.2307/1167274
  15. Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
  16. Hofvendahl, J. (2010). Utvecklingssamtalen- några vanligt förekommande problem. In C. Lundahl, & M. Folke-Fichtelius (Ed.), Bedömning i och av skolan- praktik, politik, principer [Assessment in and of school- practice, policy, principle], 165-181. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  17. Holmgren, A. (2010). Lärargruppens arbete med bedömning för lärande. Lundahl, C. & Folke-Fichtelius, M. (ed.), Bedömning i och om skolan- praktik, politik, principer [Assessment in and about school - practice, policy, principle], 31-46. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  18. Lindqvist, A. (2010). Dans i skolan: Om genus, kropp och uttryck [Dance in schools: About gender, body and expressions]. Doctoral dissertation. Umeå: Umeå University.
  19. Klapp Lekholm, A. (2008). Grades and grade assignment: effects of student and school characteristics (Doctoral dissertation). Gothenburg: Gothenburg University.
  20. Lan, W. (2005). Self-monitoring and its relationship with educational level and task importance. Educational Psychology, 25(1), 109-127.10.1080/0144341042000294921
  21. Lundahl, C. (2011). Bedömning för lärande. [Assessment for learning]. Stockholm: Norstedts.
  22. Nielsen, F. V. (2002). Quality and value in the interpretation of music from a phenomenological point of view. A draft. Zeitschrift für Kritische Musikpädagogik.
  23. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203994610
  24. Patočka, J. (2013). Inledning till fenomenologisk filosofi. Huddinge: Södertörn University.
  25. Parviainen, J. (2003). Dance techne: Kinetic bodily logos and thinking in movement. Nordisk Estetisk Tidskrift, 15, 27-28.
  26. Rinne, I. (2013). Att bedöma och bemöta - Förståelsen av betyg så som den visar sig I ett betygsamtal på gymnasiet [To Assess and meet - The understanding of grade as it emerges in a grade conference in upper secondary school]. Nordic Studies in Education, 33(03), 171-186.10.18261/ISSN1891-5949-2013-03-03
  27. Rinne, I. (2014). Pedagogisk takt i betygssamtal: en fenomenologisk hermeneutisk studie av gymnasielärares och elevers förståelse av betyg [The tact of teaching in grade conferences. A phenomenological hermeneutical study of upper secondary school teachers’ and students’ understanding of grades]. Doctoral dissertation. Gothenburg: Gothenburg University.
  28. Sadler, D. Royce. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144.10.1007/BF00117714
  29. Sadler, D. R. (2007). Perils in the meticulous specification of goals and assessment criteria. Assessment in Education 14(3), 387-392.10.1080/09695940701592097
  30. Sadler, D. R. (2009). Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 159-179.10.1080/02602930801956059
  31. Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1979). The phenomenology of dance. London: Dance.
  32. Spiegelberg, H. (1960). The phenomenological movement: An historical introduction. The Hague. Swedish National Agency for Education. (2004). Handlingsplan för en rättssäker och likvärdig betygssättning [Proposal for a legal and equal grading].
  33. Swedish National Agency for Education. (2011a). Läroplan, examensmål och gymnasiegemensamma ämnen för gymnasieskola. [Curriculum for the upper secondary school].
  34. Swedish National Agency for Education. (2011b). Kunskapsbedömning i skolan- praxis, begrepp, problem och möjligheter [Knowledge assessment in school- praxis, concepts, issues and possibilities].
  35. Swedish National Agency for Education. (2012). Upper Secondary School 2011. Retrieved from http://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=2801
  36. Swedish National Agency for Education. (2013). Curriculum for upper secondary school.
  37. Swedish Research Council. (2002). Forskningsetiska principer - inom humanistisk- -samhällsvetenskaplig forskning. [Ethical research guidelines - within humanistic and social scientific research].
  38. Torrance, H. (2007). Assessment as learning? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(3), 281-294.10.1080/09695940701591867
  39. Warburton, E. C. (2010). From talent identification to multidimensional assessment: toward new models of evaluation in dance education. Research in Dance Education, 3(2), 103-121.10.1080/1464789022000050480
  40. Zandén, O. (2010). Samtal om samspel. Kvalitetsuppfattningar i musiklärares dialoger om ensemblespel på gymnasiet [Discourses on music-making: Conceptions of quality in music teachers’ dialogues on upper secondary school ensemble playing]. Doctoral dissertation, Gothenburg: Art Monitor.
  41. Zandén, O., & Ferm Thorgersen, C. (2015). Teaching for learning or teaching for documentation? Music teachers’ perspectives on a Swedish curriculum reform. British Journal of Music Education, 32(01), 37-50.10.1017/S0265051714000266
  42. Zhao, L., & Badler, N. I. (2001). Synthesis and acquisition of laban movement analysis qualitative parameters for communicative gestures. Technical Reports (CIS). Paper 116.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jped-2016-0014 | Journal eISSN: 1338-2144 | Journal ISSN: 1338-1563
Language: English
Page range: 11 - 32
Published on: Dec 30, 2016
Published by: University of Trnava, Faculty of Education
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2016 Ninnie Andersson, published by University of Trnava, Faculty of Education
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.