References
- Amnesty International. (2000). NATO/Federal Republic of Yugoslavia “Collateral damage” or unlawful killings? Violations of the Laws of War by NATO during Operation Allied Force: Amnesty International.
- Andrews, J. D., & Moss, T. R. (2002). Risk assessment Reliability and risk assessment (Second ed., pp. 411-448). London: Professional Engineering Publishing Limited.
- Aven, T. (2009). Identification of safety and security critical systems and activities. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 94(2), 404-411.10.1016/j.ress.2008.04.001
- Bakx, G. C. H., & Richardson, R. A. L. (2013). Risk assessments at the Royal Netherlands Air Force: An explorative study. Journal of Risk Research, 16(5), 595-611.10.1080/13669877.2012.726249
- Bang, M. (2014). Pitfalls in Military Quantitative Intelligence Analysis: Incident Reporting in a Low Intensity Conflict. Intelligence and National Security.10.1080/02684527.2014.930584
- Burns, R. (2013, Feb 26 2013). APNEWSBREAK: Taliban attacks not down after all, The Associated Press.
- Clark, R. M. (2013). Intelligence analysis (4th ed.). London: Sage.
- Committee report to ICTY. (2000). Final Report to the Prosecutor by the Committee established to Review the NATO Bombing Campaign Against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. The Hague: International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.
- DCDC. (2010). Joint doctrine for joint force protection, Publication 3-64. Shrivenham: The Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre, Ministry of Defence, United Kingdom.
- Department of the Army. (2006). Composite Risk Management, FM 5-19 (FM 100-14). Washington DC: Headquarters Department of the Army.
- Dinstein, Y. (2011). The Conduct of Hostilities under the law of International Armed Conflict (second ed.). United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511845246
- Doshi, P. (2009). Calibrated response to emerging infections. BMJ, 339.10.1136/bmj.b3471
- Frosdick, S. (1997). The techniques of risk analysis are insufficient in themselves. Disaster Prevention and Management, 6(3), 165-177.10.1108/09653569710172937
- George, R. Z., & Bruce, J. B. (2008). The age of analysis. In R. Z. George & J. B. Bruce (Eds.), Analyzing intelligence (pp. 295-308). Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
- Hansson, S. O. (1993). The false promise of risk analysis. Ratio-New Series, 6(1), 16-26.10.1111/j.1467-9329.1993.tb00049.x
- Hansson, S. O. (2012). Riskfilosofi, En introduktion [In swedish]. Stockholm: Liber.
- Henckerts, J.-M., & Doswald-Beck, L. (2010). Customary International Humanitarian Law (Vol. Volume I: Rules). United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
- Hubbard, D. W. (2009). Worse than useless: The most popular risk assessment method and why it doesn't work The failure of risk management: Why it's broken and how to fix it. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
- ICTY Trial Chamber. (2004). Prosecutor vs. Blaskic, Blaskic case IT-95-14-T, 122 ILR 1. The Hague: the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.
- Johnson, C. W. (2007). The Paradoxes of Military Risk Assessment. Paper presented at the the 25th International Systems Safety Conference, Baltimore, USA.
- Kunreuther, H. (2002). Risk analysis and risk management in an uncertain world. [Editorial Material]. Risk Analysis, 22(4), 655-664.10.1111/0272-4332.00057
- Kuo, C. (2007). Safety management and its maritime application. London: The Nautical Institute.
- Lehtomäki, K., Pääkkönen, R. J., & Rantanen, J. (2005). Risk Analysis of Finnish Peacekeeping in Kosovo. Risk Analysis, 25(2), 389-396.10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00597.x
- Liwång, H. (2012). Risk-based ship security analysis - an approach based on civilian and military methods. (Licentiate in Engineering), Chalmers Univeristy of Technology, Gothenburg.
- Liwång, H., Ringsberg, J. W., & Norsell, M. (2013). Quantitative risk analysis - Ship security analysis for effective risk control options. Safety Science, 58(0), 98-112.10.1016/j.ssci.2013.04.003
- Marine Corps Institute. (2002). Operational Risk Management, ORM 1-0. Washington DC: Headquarters Marine Corps.
- NATO. (2007). Allied joint doctrine for force protection, AJP-3.14. Brussels: NATO Standardisation Agency.
- NATO. (2010). Comprehensive operations planning directive, V1.0. Brussels: NATO Supreme Headquarters Allied Power Europe.
- Osterholm, M. T. (2005). Preparing for the Next Pandemic. New England Journal of Medicine, 352(18), 1839-1842.10.1056/NEJMp058068
- Reason, J. (2000). Safety paradoxes and safety culture. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 7(1), 3-14.10.1076/1566-0974(200003)7:1;1-V;FT003
- Rebugio, A. B. (2013). Bias and Perception: How it Affects Our Judgment in Decision Making and Analysis. Small Wars Journal.
- RTO/NATO. (2008). Improving Common Security Risk Analysis, RTO-TR-IST-049. Brussels: The Research and Technology Organisation (RTO) of NATO.
- Shearer, R. (2011). Operational analysis in Iraq: Sifting through the fog of war. Military Operations Research, 16(2), 63-71.10.5711/1082598316263
- Silver, N. (2012). The signal and the noise, Why so many predictions fail - but some don't. New York: the Penguin Press.
- Swedish Armed Forces. (2009a). Försvarsmaktens gemensamma riskhanteringsmodell [In swedish]. Stockholm: Swedish Armed Forces.
- Swedish Armed Forces. (2009b). Handbok bedömning antagonistiska hot [In swedish]. Stockholm: Swedish Armed Forces.
- The White House. (2013). Presidential Policy Directive -- Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience. Washington DC: The White House, Office of the Press Secretary.
- Tomes, S. (2012). Risk: misunderstanding or military misnomer. The British Army Review, 153, 32-40.
- University of Cincinnati. (2004). Introduction to the principles of war and operations. Cincinnati: University of Cincinnati.
- Yang, Z. L., Wang, J., & Li, K. X. (2013). Maritime safety analysis in retrospect. Maritime Policy & Management, 40(3), 261-277.10.1080/03088839.2013.782952