Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Measuring military university Students’ motivational goals in the domain of physical exercise Cover

Measuring military university Students’ motivational goals in the domain of physical exercise

Open Access
|Dec 2016

Figures & Tables

Tab. 1

Factor loadings, internal consistencies and corrected item–total correlations for parallel solutions.

FactorItem
αλrcitOriginal scale
Two-dimensional model (58.1% of variance explained), goodness-of-fit χ2/df=160.3/34,p<0.001
Factor 10.89
26. To develop as much as possible is an important goal for me in my training.0.850.75Mast-int
4. An important goal for me is to get good results in sports.0.840.78Mast-ext
28. Getting good results is important for me.0.820.74Mast-ext
34. My goal is to do well in training.0.790.73Mast-ext
11. I train to improve and develop my fitness level.0.720.68Mast-int
17. To develop is an important goal for me in my training.0.640.60Mast-int
Factor 20.81
24. It is important for me not to fail in front of other people when I exercise.0.820.72Perf-avo
9. I try to avoid situations in training in which I might look less fit or weak.0.820.65Perf-avo
16. I try to avoid situations in training in which I might fail or make mistakes.0.820.64Perf-avo
29. It is important for me that others think that I am competent and fit.0.500.52Perf-appr
22. It feels really good if I manage to show others that I am really fit.0.480.50Perf-appr
Three-dimensional model (64.6% of variance explained), goodness-of-fit χ2/df=16.6/12,p=0.166
Factor 10.87
16. I try to avoid situations in training in which I might fail or make mistakes.0.890.77Perf-avo
9. I try to avoid situations in training in which I might look less fit or weak.0.790.75Perf-avo
24. It is important for me not to fail in front of other people when I exercise.0.750.71Perf-avo
Factor 20.81
11. I train to improve and develop my fitness level.0.910.76Mast-int
17. To develop is an important goal for me in my training.0.870.73Mast-int
26. To develop as much as possible is an important goal for me in my training.0.650.58Mast-int
Factor 30.68
29. It is important for me that others think that I am competent and fit.0.760.61Perf-appr
1. An important goal for me when I exercise is to do better than other people.0.600.42Perf-appr
22. It feels really good if I manage to show others that I am really fit.0.530.48Perf-appr
Reduced four-dimensional model (71.5% of variance explained), goodness-of-fit χ2/df=16.5/11,p=0.123
Factor 10.87
28. Getting good results is important for me.0.890.78Mast-ext
4. An important goal for me is to get good results in sports.0.780.78Mast-ext
34. My goal is to do well in training.0.710.71Mast-ext
Factor 20.87
16. I try to avoid situations in training in which I might fail or make mistakes.0.850.77Perf-avo
9. I try to avoid situations in training in which I might look less fit or weak.0.820.75Perf-avo
24. It is important for me not to fail in front of other people when I exercise.0.730.71Perf-avo
Factor 30.89
11. I train to improve and develop my fitness level.0.930.81*Mast-int
17. To develop is an important goal for me in my training.0.750.81*Mast-int
Factor 40.70
29. It is important for me that others think that I am competent and fit.0.760.54*Perf-appr
22. It feels really good if I manage to show others that I am really fit.0.580.54*Perf-appr

Notes:

Maximum likelihood with varimax rotation.

λ, factor loading;rcit, corrected item–total correlation; mast-int, mastery-intrinsic orientation; mast-ext, mastery-extrinsic orientation; perf-appr, performance-approach orientation; perf-avo, performance-avoidance orientation.

* As these factors include only two items, the corrected item-total correlation should be interpreted with caution.

* As these factors include only two items, the corrected item-total correlation should be interpreted with caution.

* As these factors include only two items, the corrected item-total correlation should be interpreted with caution.

* As these factors include only two items, the corrected item-total correlation should be interpreted with caution.

Tab. 2

Goodness-of-fit criteria for the compared models.

ModelX2CFISRMR
Measurement (four-dimensional)156.8 (48)0.830.095
Modified measurement1100.2 (47)0.940.079
Two-dimensional2218.2 (43)0.800.122
Modified two-dimensional3102.3 (51)0.930.108
Three-dimensional464.9 (24)0.930.085
Modified three-dimensional552.15 (23)0.950.075
Reduced four-dimensional6153.31 (32)0.840.075
Modified and reduced57.05 (31)0.960.054
four-dimensional7

Notes: Definitions for modifications of models are as follows:

CFI, comparative fit index; SRMR, standardized root-mean-square residual.

1 The error covariance between one pair of similarly worded items was freed.

2 Combined mastery and performance dimensions.

3 The error covariance between two pairs of similarly worded items was freed.

4 Mastery-extrinsic orientation excluded.

5 The error covariance between one pair of similarly worded items was freed.

6 Excluded one item from mastery-intrinsic and performance-approach dimensions.

7 The error covariance between one pair of similarly worded items was freed.

Tab. 3

Zero-order correlations and descriptive statistics.

MSD1234
Two-dimensional solution
1. 2Dmastery orientation5.920.94
2. 2Dperformance orientation3.521.140.13
Three-dimensional solution
1. 3Dmastery-intrinsic orientation6.230.85
2. 3Dperformance-approach orientation4.351.300.32***
3. 3Dperformance-avoidance orientation2.701.29−0.080.36***
Reduced four-dimensional solution
1. R4Dmastery-intrinsic orientation6.460.82
2. R4Dmastery-extrinsic orientation5.611.200.54***
3. R4Dperformance-approach orientation4.741.410.160.34***
4. R4Dperformance-avoidance orientation2.701.29−0.15−0.020.45***

Notes:

*p<0.05

**p<0.01

2D/3D, two-/three-dimensional; R4D, reduced four-dimensional.

*** p<0.001.

*** p<0.001.

*** p<0.001.

*** p<0.001.

*** p<0.001.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jms-2016-0001 | Journal eISSN: 1799-3350 | Journal ISSN: 2242-3524
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 10
Submitted on: Dec 10, 2015
Accepted on: Apr 22, 2016
Published on: Dec 31, 2016
Published by: National Defense University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2016 Antti-Tuomas Pulkka, published by National Defense University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.