Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Functions of Uni- and Multi-citations: Implications for Weighted Citation Analysis Cover

Functions of Uni- and Multi-citations: Implications for Weighted Citation Analysis

Open Access
|Feb 2017

References

  1. Bertram, S. (1972). Citations counts. In A. Pitemick (Ed.), Fourth Annual Meeting, American Society for Information Science, Western Canada Chapter (pp. 61–67). Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
  2. Bonzi, S. (1982). Characteristics of a literature as predictors of relatedness between cited and citing works. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33(4), 208–216.
  3. Borgman, C.L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36(1), 3–72.
  4. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). What co-citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45–80.
  5. Boyack, K.W., Small, H., & Klavans, R. (2013). Improving the accuracy of co-citation clustering using full text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(9), 1759–1767.
  6. Brooks, T.A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229.
  7. Brooks, T.A. (1986). Evidence of complex citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(1), 34–36.
  8. Cano, V. (1989). Citation behavior – Classification, utility, and location. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(4), 284–290.
  9. Case, D.O., & Higgins, G.M. (2000). How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(7), 635–645.
  10. Cronin, B. (1984). The citation process. The role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham.
  11. Chubin, D.E., & Moitra, S.D. (1975). Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science, 5(4), 423–441.
  12. Ding, Y., & Cronin, B. (2011). Popular and/or prestigious? Measures of scholarly esteem. Information Processing and Management, 47(1), 80–96.
  13. Ding, Y., Liu, X., Guo, C., & Cronin, B. (2013). The distribution of references across texts: Some implications for citation analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 583–592.
  14. Doumont, J. (Ed.). (2010). English communication for scientists. Cambridge: NPG Education. Retrieved on September 22, 2016, from http://www.nature.com/scitable/ebooks/english-communication-for-scientists-14053993.
  15. Dubin, D. (2004). The most influential paper Gerard Salton never wrote. Library Trends, 52(4), 748–764.
  16. Edge, D. (1979). Quantitative measures of communication in science: A critical review. History of Science Cambridge, 17(36), 102–134.
  17. Garfield, E. (1962). Can citation indexing be automated? Essays of an Information Scientists: 1962–1973, 84–90. Retrieved on September 22, 2016, from http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/allvols.html.
  18. Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing – Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  19. Griffith, B.C. (1990). Understanding science: Studies of communication and information. In C.L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics (pp. 33–45). Newbury Park: Sage Publications, Inc.
  20. Hall, B.H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics, 36 (1), 16–38.
  21. Hanney, S., Frame, I., Grant, J., Buxton, M., Young, T., & Lewison, G. (2005). Using categorizations of citations when assessing the outcomes of health research. Scientometrics, 65(3), 357-379.
  22. Harwood, N. (2008). Citers’ use of citees’ names: Findings from a qualitative interview-based study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 1007–1011.
  23. Herlach, G. (1978). Can retrieval of information from citation indexes be simplified? Multiple mention of a reference as a characteristic of the link between cited and citing article. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29(6), 308–310.
  24. Hou, W., Li, M., & Niu, D. (2011). Counting citations in texts rather than reference lists to improve the accuracy of assessing scientific contribution. BioEssays, 33(10), 724–727.
  25. Jeong, Y.K., Song, M., & Ding, Y. (2014). Content-based author co-citation analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 197–211.
  26. Liu, M. (1993). The complexities of citation practice: A review of citation studies. Journal of Documentation, 49(4), 370–408.
  27. McCain, K.W., & Turner, K. (1989). Citation context analysis and aging patterns of journal articles in molecular genetics. Scientometrics, 17(1), 127–163.
  28. Merton, R.K. (1942). Science and technology in a democratic order. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1(1), 115–126.
  29. Moravcsik, M.J., & Murugesan, P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5(1), 86–92.
  30. Narin, F. (1976). Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity. Washington, DC: Computer Horizons.
  31. Peritz, B.C. (1992). On the objectives of citation analysis: Problems of theory and method. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(6), 448–451.
  32. Prabha, C.G. (1983). Some aspects of citation behavior – A pilot-study in business administration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34(3), 202–206.
  33. Shadish, W.R., Tolliver, D., Gray, M., & Gupta, S.K.S. (1995). Author judgements about works they cite: Three studies from psychology journals. Social Studies of Science, 25(3), 477–498.
  34. Small, H. (1977). A co-citation model of a scientific specialty: A longitudinal study of collagen research. Social Studies of Science, 7(2), 139–166.
  35. Small, H. (1982). Citation context analysis. In B.J. Dervin & M.J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in Communication Sciences, 3, (pp. 287–310). Norwood: Ablex.
  36. Suppe, F. (1998). The structure of a scientific paper. Philosophy of Science, 65(3), 381–405. Retrieved on September 22, 2016, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/188275.
  37. Tabatabaei, N. (2013). Contribution of information science to other disciplines as reflected in citation contexts of highly cited JASIST papers. Montreal. (McGill University P.hD. dissertation)
  38. Tang, R., & Safer, M.A. (2008). Author-rated importance of cited references in biology and psychology publications. Journal of Documentation, 64(2), 246–272.
  39. Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A., & Tidhar, D. (2006). Automatic classification of citation function. Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 103–110). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  40. Tranöy, K.E. (1980). Norms of inquiry: Rationality, consistency requirements and normative conflict. In Rationality in Science (pp. 191–202). Springer Netherlands.
  41. Vinkler, P. (1987). A quasi-quantitative citation model. Scientometrics, 12(1), 47–72.
  42. Voos, H., & Dagaev, K.S. (1976). Are all citations equal? Or Did we op. cit. your idem? Journal of Academic Librarianship, 1(6), 19–21.
  43. White, H.D. (1990). Author co-citation analysis: Overview and defense. In C.L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, 84, 106. Newbury Park: Sage.
  44. White, M.D. & Wang, P.L. (1997). A qualitative study of citing behavior: Contributions, criteria, and metalevel documentation concerns. Library Quarterly, 67(2), 122–154.
  45. Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2015a). Re-citation analysis: Promising for research evaluation, knowledge network analysis, knowledge representation and information retrieval? Proceedings of the 15th International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, June 30–July 3, 2015, Istanbul, Turkey.
  46. Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2015b). Analysis and visualization of citation networks. Williston, VT: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
  47. Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2016). Dimensions and uncertainties of author citation rankings: Lessons learned from frequency-weighted in-text citation counting. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(3), 671–682.
  48. Zhu, X., Turney, P., Lemire, D., & Vellino, A. (2015). Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(2), 408–427.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2543-683X | Journal ISSN: 2096-157X
Language: English
Page range: 51 - 69
Submitted on: Nov 16, 2016
Accepted on: Nov 20, 2016
Published on: Feb 18, 2017
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2017 Dangzhi Zhao, Alicia Cappello, Lucinda Johnston, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.